similar to: site updates

Dear LLVM community, I am affiliated with the design and development of the Pony<http:/www.ponylang.org> programming language, which was recently published and has since been discussed on hacker news<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9482483>, reddit [1]<http://www.reddit.com/r/ponylang>

Dear all, I would have a proposal for adding a project to the page http://llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM/. We successfully use LLVM as a base for a retargetable compiler and below is some information on the project. If you would have any comments, questions or if we should improve the text below, please let me know. --- Codasip Studio By Codasip Ltd. (link https://www.codasip.com/) Codasip

Hi all, I know this is a long shot, but could renaming the "Journey" module please be considered by those in a position to support it? I''ve written an issue on this in the journey repo also: https://github.com/rails/journey/issues/49 Essentially our project has a model named Journey, the same as Rails 3.2''s new routing driver. As a consequence we can no longer

http://www.reddit.com/r/netsec/comments/158g8s/hijacking_ruby_on_rails_apps_through_exposed/ FYI -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options,

I''ve seen a few examples of dummy Rails apps (for testing, so they live under test or spec dirs, typically) for use with the Appraisals gem that supposedly work with both Rails 3.x and Rails 4, but they seem hackish and not fully functional. It is somewhat expected, as it is a stripped down Frankenstein monster that is trying to be compatible with various versions of Rails 3 as well

> On 10/24/14, 8:26 PM, betulb at codeaurora.org wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> We've been working on enhancing LLVM's instrumentation based profiling >> by >> adding indirect call target profiling support. Our goal is to add >> instrumentation around indirect call sites, so that we may track the >> frequently taken target addresses and their call

Hello John, Thank you very much for your fast response and the patch. Is it possible to add Fabian Scheler and Florian Franzmann to the people section as proposed in the attached patch? I hope to manage to write a description for the 'ProjectsWithLLVM' page this week and send it to the list. Thanks again, Tobias Am 26.09.2013 21:26, schrieb John Criswell: > Dear Tobias, > >

Hi All, We've been working on enhancing LLVM's instrumentation based profiling by adding indirect call target profiling support. Our goal is to add instrumentation around indirect call sites, so that we may track the frequently taken target addresses and their call frequencies. The acquired data has uses in optimization of indirect function call heavy applications. Our initial findings

Just monkey patched Sprockets in our Rails 3.2.9 app to override the Cache-Control header for html assets that we need to tweak more often in development, but that we don''t want to use digests/fingerprinting with: # Sprockets 2.x patch if Rails.env.development? module Sprockets module Server private alias_method :sprockets_headers, :headers def headers(env,

Someone asked me about the history of the method naming in activerecord and I wasn''t sure where to point them. For example, there was early criticism noted of has_and_belongs_to_many in this old post from 2005: http://hans.fugal.net/blog/2005/10/03/habtm/ I was mentioning that many_to_many is not used because there are a few different ways of doing that via has_many :through and

Thank you both very much! Now there is only the copyright issue remains unresolved. Does anybody know the person, who designed it initially? Thanks in advance! Tobias Am 14.10.2013 22:51, schrieb John Criswell: > On 9/30/13 7:19 AM, Tobias Klaus wrote: >> Hello John, >> >> Thank you very much for your fast response and the patch. >> >> Is it possible to add

(The following is not a Rails-specific question, but relates to a problem that affects Rails, so I wonder whether anyone on the team has an opinion about it or knows whether a solution is already in development.) While gem dependencies can be easily managed in a Gemfile by Bundler, when it comes to other assets, you either have to manually copy javascript files into the app/assets or vendor

On 9/30/13 7:19 AM, Tobias Klaus wrote: > Hello John, > > Thank you very much for your fast response and the patch. > > Is it possible to add Fabian Scheler and Florian Franzmann to the > people section as proposed in the attached patch? Done, and the patch is committed. Thanks, Bill, for adding the ProjectsWithLLVM entry. -- John T. > > I hope to manage to write a

Thanks John. Does this solve the problem of analysis availability though? If I still have to run the function analyses manually, I might as well keep rolling with the CallGraphSCCPass. (I probably should have mentioned that this is what I’m using right now.) Félix > Le 2015-05-19 à 10:12:32, John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com> a écrit : > > On 5/18/15 10:45 PM, Félix Cloutier

John, Yes, I'm taking care about application as usual. On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > I believe Anton was going to do so. > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015, 5:14 PM John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Dear All, >> >> Has someone registered LLVM as an organization for Google Summer of

Hi Simon, > From: Simone Atzeni <simone.at at gmail.com> > To: John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Walking thru CallGraph bottom up > Message-ID: <318EBA41-2040-4EFE-B330-5813C817C2A2 at gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > I think I got it and the example is

John, thanks for your helpful advice. My ultimate goal is to construct a full instruction-level program dependence graph for a given IR file. The hard point is how to establish the correct data dependence edges when some function arguments are multi-level pointers. To solve this problem I hope to check the point-to level for each pointer variable. I think the data dependence through pointers can

Sir, I am interested in adding a new analysis or optimization pass and building the getting started guide as a project for gsoc. On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:29 AM, John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/17/16 10:58 AM, Om Shivom Nagpal wrote: > > No i have not worked previously on llvm. I have looked through the > projects but because of no prior experience i am

Hi, I am wondering if anyone could run ArrayBoundChecks located in SafeCode-llvm37 (https://github.com/jtcriswell/safecode-llvm37) on llvm-3.8? Thanks. Syed -- Rafi

Thanks John. I guess I will use a ModulePass, so when I am implementing the “runOnModule” function, do I have to loop through all the functions, for each functions all the BasicBlocks and for each BasicBlock all the instructions or given the Module I have to call the CallGraph directly? Is there an example out there? I can’t find anything. Thanks. Simone > On Feb 24, 2015, at 13:29, John