similar to: [LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 11000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question"

2015 Jul 27
0
[LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question
Daniel, We are using 3.6. Someone also pointed out that it was mandatory in 3.6.2 but I have not verified that. On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > It's not supposed to be. There was a short period where it was > unintentionally mandatory but this was fixed after I pointed it out during > post-commit review. > >
2015 Jul 27
2
[LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question
I've just looked at my checkout of 3.6 and it looks like the fix wasn't merged. I don't have the revision number for the fix to hand but in lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp, this: MatchFilterBB = (!FilterDAGBasicBlockName.empty() && FilterDAGBasicBlockName == FuncInfo->MBB->getBasicBlock()->getName().str());
2015 Jul 27
1
[LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question
Daniel, Ok, thanks. Simple fix. We'll just make correction in local copy for now, one less thing to port later :) Thanks. On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > I've just looked at my checkout of 3.6 and it looks like the fix wasn't > merged. I don't have the revision number for the fix to hand but in >
2015 Aug 11
2
Fwd: [LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question
Hi, It's changed a few times over the last year. I believe xdg-open spawns whichever application your desktop environment would use to open the file so you should be able to tell it to use dotty. From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Taylor via llvm-dev Sent: 11 August 2015 00:30 To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: [llvm-dev] Fwd: [LLVMdev]
2015 Aug 01
3
[LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question
The diff is not only the && and || but also the leading !: diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp index 58f029fbe9fc..7ee06fc153b2 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ void SelectionDAGISel::CodeGenAndEmitDAG() {
2009 Sep 04
1
[LLVMdev] viewing dags
Hi I would like to view the various dags being output during codegen. Unfortunately, I am not seeing the files being dumped. I will really appreciate if someone can help me here llc switch.bc -f -view-dag-combine1-dags ( i tried -view-isel-dags, -view-sched-dags as well) Writing '/tmp/llvm_zbbAKM/dag.main.dot'... done. Writing '/tmp/llvm_G4rLKf/dag.main.dot'... done. Writing
2011 Aug 15
0
[LLVMdev] Order of code generation
After enabling assertions and recompilation I still get this error. ~/bin/llvm$ llc -view-isel-dags t3.bc llc: Unknown command line argument '-view-isel-dags'. Try: 'llc -help' llc: Did you mean '-fast-isel-abort'? and I see the view-edge bundles option but get the following error. ~/bin/llvm$ llc -view-edge-bundles t3.bc Writing
2009 Sep 04
0
[LLVMdev] Using -view-legalize-dags
I'm trying to debug an issue in codegen but when using: llc -view-legalize-dags -O1 -march=x86-64 -o c-01.s c-opt.bc I get a .dot file and while it has the DAG the nodes do not have any text. I'm probably doing something very stupid but I cannot figure what it is can anyone point out what I'm doing wrong? Thanks, Ben I'm on Unbunto 9.3: dotty version 96c
2009 Dec 01
1
[LLVMdev] Viewing graphs while debugging code under windows?
Hi Ether, The detection for graphviz / dotty / ... has been added recently to llvm cmake. It should work properly if those tools are available in the PATH. The related svn commits are : 86153, 86547 and 86644. Those commits are not present in llvm release <= 2.6, but they are straight forward to apply. Best regards, -- Arnaud de Grandmaison -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at
2009 Dec 01
0
[LLVMdev] Viewing graphs while debugging code under windows?
Hi Ether, I work under Windows and am able to view graphs generated by LLVM. I haven't tried generating and viewing dog graphs while debugging but I hope this helps. What I do is to invoke llc.exe and pass a switch to generate the graph at the stage(s) you want to see (DAG combine, legalize, scheduling, etc), for example: llc.exe mykernel.ll -view-legalize-dags -f. The graphs are saved
2009 Dec 01
2
[LLVMdev] Viewing graphs while debugging code under windows?
hi eli, i delete the cache of cmake, and reconfigure the project, but HAVE_GRAPHVIZ still undefine. do you know what i should do? thanks very much. regards --ether On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:32 PM, ether zhhb <etherzhhb at gmail.com> wrote: >> hi all, >> >> i just install gv and
2011 Aug 15
2
[LLVMdev] Order of code generation
On 15/08/11 13:12, محمد ﻋﻤﺮ ﺩﻫﻠﻮﻯ wrote: > How do I enable the assertions when building ? > I am using 2.9, the current version, and when I use the standard build llc does > not give me the view-*-dags options. Configure with --enable-assertions Ciao, Duncan. > > -Omer > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr > <mailto:baldrick at
2009 Jul 14
2
[LLVMdev] [patch] Dotty printer for dependency trees
Hi, I started to work with llvm and liked the CFG dotty printer a lot. However there was none for the dominance trees. I implemented dotty printing for dominance trees and introduced these new flags: -dot-dom : Print dominance tree of function to 'dot' file -dot-dom-only : Print dominance tree of function to 'dot' file (with no function
2016 Feb 02
3
creating Intrinsic DAG Node
Matt, This seems to generate llvm.my_intrinsic just fine in the DAG, so no DAG errors; however, it won't match. For example, if I call the intrinsic from C, the DAG node looks to be named the same in dotty file but it won't match... am I missing something? I've done it exactly the way it was done above. The DAG looks great but it won't match. Did I miss something? Thanks.
2009 Dec 01
2
[LLVMdev] Viewing graphs while debugging code under windows?
hi all, i just install gv and dotty for windows, but i cant see any way to configure it using cmake. is Viewing graphs under windows supported? and how could i configure it? regards --ether
2009 Jul 14
0
[LLVMdev] [patch] Dotty printer for dependency trees
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 00:20 +0200, Tobias Grosser wrote: > Hi, > > I started to work with llvm and liked the CFG dotty printer a lot. > However there was none for the dominance trees. > > I implemented dotty printing for dominance trees And here is the patch. Tobi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:
2012 Jun 16
1
[LLVMdev] broken dotty?
Hi, I'm running ubuntu 12.04 and I'm trying to use dotty, the graphs are produced but without data - there are just dots in the nodes instead of text. Does anyone else have any trouble? Cheers, sam -- View this message in context: http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/broken-dotty-tp46278.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2008 Aug 22
3
[LLVMdev] LLC -view-isel-dags option on Windows/Cygwin build
I was able to compile LLVM on windows (llvm2.3) using Visual studio. When I type llc -help command, I do not see -view-isel-dags option (http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html document mentions about it). Is this option is supported on Windows (or Cygwin) build? Thanks a bunch, -Sanjay -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2023 Mar 13
1
Multiple Assignment built into the R Interpreter?
Yes, this is really a problem with the checks, not with the language. A simpler approach than your alternativeAssignment function would be simply to allow globalVariables() to be limited to a single function as the note in its help page says. This might be tedious to write by hand, but could be automated using methods like "dotify" in dotty. Duncan Murdoch On 12/03/2023 10:36
2023 Mar 12
1
Multiple Assignment built into the R Interpreter?
On 12/03/2023 6:07 a.m., Sebastian Martin Krantz wrote: > Thinking more about this, and seeing Kevins examples at > https://github.com/kevinushey/dotty > <https://github.com/kevinushey/dotty>, I think this is the most R-like > way of doing it, > with an additional benefit as it would allow to introduce the useful > data.table semantics DT[, .(a = b, c, d)] to more