similar to: Bug or expected behavior of APFloat class?

Hi, I am working on a backend for a CGRA architecture with advanced predicate support (as on EPIC machines and as first used in the OpenIMPACT compiler). Until last month, the backend was working fine, but since the r161643 commit by stoklund, my backend doesn't work anymore. I think I noticed some related commits later on, and the assertion I get on the latest trunk (r164162) differs from

We've had this more general topic on R-help, and also in R-devel recently. There's one case here where I get the feeling R never gets into swapping but more directly aborts possibly from a bug we can more easily fix. Today I've been working (successfully! - not yet committed) at fixing str() for very large strings. In this process, I've found that pc <- function(.)

formatC(0.0001, digits = 3, format = "f", zero.print="< 0.01") Error in strrep(" ", nc - i1) : invalid 'times' value The problem, if it is one, is in .format.zeros: .format.zeros("0.000", "xxxxxx") Error in strrep(" ", nc - i1) : invalid 'times' value R version 3.5.1. David [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

2011/2/28 John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>: > On 2/28/11 6:31 AM, Gabriel Rodríguez wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am trying to extend a FunctionType to include new parameters. In > particular, I want to > ensure that the main function has been declared with both argsc and argsv. > However > there seems to be no easy way to accomplish this: >

FYI. G?bor ? R --vanilla -q > sessionInfo() R version 3.4.3 (2017-11-30) Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit) Running under: macOS Sierra 10.12.6 Matrix products: default BLAS: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.4/Resources/lib/libRblas.0.dylib LAPACK: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.4/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib locale: [1]

On 2/28/11 10:04 AM, Frits van Bommel wrote: > 2011/2/28 John Criswell<criswell at illinois.edu>: >> On 2/28/11 6:31 AM, Gabriel Rodríguez wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I am trying to extend a FunctionType to include new parameters. In >> particular, I want to >> ensure that the main function has been declared with both argsc and argsv. >>

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 5:10 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > On 2/28/11 10:04 AM, Frits van Bommel wrote: >> I don't think a full clone is necessary, since he wants to replace the >> function. He only needs to create the new function and splice in the >> body of the old one. > > That is exactly what MakeFunctionClone() does.  It creates a

On Sep 18, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Bjorn De Sutter <bjorn.desutter at elis.ugent.be> wrote: > I am working on a backend for a CGRA architecture with advanced predicate support (as on EPIC machines and as first used in the OpenIMPACT compiler). Until last month, the backend was working fine, but since the r161643 commit by stoklund, my backend doesn't work anymore. I think I noticed some

That would be because the product nc * ni overflows in cbuf = buf = CallocCharBuf(nc * ni); Since we disallow strings with more than 2^31-1 bytes we could test and reject this. It might be more future-proof to change the declaration of int j, ni, nc; to R_xlen_t j, ni, nc; and let the character allocation code reject, but that would create a memory leak since the Free call

Dear All, I need your help urgently I have to copy the CFG of each function using CloneFunction or CloneFunctionInto. After I made the copy function. Print the basic blocks then get this error : While deleting: i32 % Use still stuck around after Def is destroyed: %mul2_ = mul nsw i32 %6, 3 Use still stuck around after Def is destroyed: store i32 3, i32* %x_, align 4 opt: Value.cpp:75: virtual

Hi, both versions are working: FunctionType *asm_Ftype = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, std::vector<const Type*>(), false); InlineAsm* Iasm = InlineAsm::get(asm_Ftype,"isync","~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}",true); How can I insert this InlineAsm, because it is no instruction and this way it will not work: Instruction *pi = bi;

Hi You could try to find an equivalent representation as a string and try to match those. > (A <- cbind(sample(1:2, 10, rep=TRUE), sample(1:2, 10, rep=TRUE))) [,1] [,2] [1,] 1 2 [2,] 1 2 [3,] 1 2 [4,] 2 2 [5,] 1 1 [6,] 1 2 [7,] 1 2 [8,] 1 1 [9,] 1 2 [10,] 1 1 > (B <- unique(A)) [,1] [,2] [1,] 1 2

configure.ac | 20 doc/Makefile.am | 2 libswfdec/jpeg/Makefile.am | 28 libswfdec/jpeg/bits.h | 120 --- libswfdec/jpeg/jpeg.c | 1129 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------- libswfdec/jpeg/jpeg.h | 58 + libswfdec/jpeg/jpeg_bits.c | 154 +++++ libswfdec/jpeg/jpeg_bits.h | 32 +

Does cloning copies the function with its address or it constructs a new address to the new function? Is this real copying for the CFG or just opaque one to do some work? If it's not real copying, please I need a method that can help me in copying the function in another with new pointer to another address. Please I need answer urgent Thanks On 29 May 2013 10:14, Rasha Omar <rasha.sala7

libswfdec/jpeg/Makefile.am | 18 - libswfdec/jpeg/bits.h | 140 ++++++------- libswfdec/jpeg/huffman.c | 67 +++--- libswfdec/jpeg/huffman.h | 35 +-- libswfdec/jpeg/jpeg.c | 217 +++++++------------- libswfdec/jpeg/jpeg.h | 28 +- libswfdec/jpeg/jpeg_debug.h | 25 -- libswfdec/jpeg/jpeg_internal.h | 143

Hi Jacob, At this point, I suspect there is a problem with maintaining liveness information during branch folding. Here is what I see: I have a basic block ready for branch optimization, that computes a predicate p10 on which a conditional branch depends. Notice that this is in the stage with physical registers. BB#2: derived from LLVM BB %while.cond.preheader Live Ins: %R3 %R5

libswfdec/jpeg/jpeg_rgb_decoder.c | 1 - 1 files changed, 1 deletion(-) New commits: diff-tree 15ed4a69b4ffc265fe103ba79a0b60af7e42a9fa (from 2073f39bc0b0aa90f1f67def9bb3f0c6b68018ae) Author: Benjamin Otte <otte@gnome.org> Date: Wed Apr 18 10:47:06 2007 +0200 remove leftover debugging statement diff --git a/libswfdec/jpeg/jpeg_rgb_decoder.c b/libswfdec/jpeg/jpeg_rgb_decoder.c

Hi all, I'm rather new to LLVM and intend to dive into partial evaluation with LLVM. I tried to run the example from http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08-23/llvm_partial.pdf, which worked after some adaptations, which were necessary, because LLVM evolved since the slides were made. However, I also tried to get the same example running as an optimization pass following the instructions in

Here's a basic patch which would solve it in sort of the same way as the other optimizations I was fixing (just special case the debug info & fix it up). I can work up a test case for this as well, or you can, if you like/this seems reasonable. On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:20:55PM -0700, David

I was wrong about needing the Relevel from the Lexis package. The default verson of relevel does the job of reshuffling levels in any desired order, albeit with a warning (which comes from the fact that apparently only a single number had been anticipated by the designer): > testf <- factor( sample( letters[1:4], 100, replace=T ) ) > table( testf, newf=relevel( testf, ref=c(3,2,1,4) )