similar to: [LLVMdev] How to not zeroinitialize array

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > Hans, > >>> I see a Git branch "release_36", but what has v3.6.0rc2 for a >>> commit-id, can you tags that? >>> No, there are no tags at all @ github. >> >> Anton, is it possible to translate the svn tags to git tags? > In the past we had problems

[ Please CC me I am not subscribed to mesa-dev and llvmdev MLs ] Hi, I already reported this when playing 1st time with my llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2 and mesa v10.3.7 [1]. The issue still remains in mesa v10.4.4. So, this is a field test to see if LLVM/Clang v3.6.0rc2 fits my needs. I see the following build-error... ... make[4]: Entering directory

On 09/02/15 17:44, Emil Velikov wrote: > Hi Sedat, > > On 07/02/15 22:42, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> [ Please CC me I am not subscribed to mesa-dev and llvmdev MLs ] >> >> Hi, >> >> I already reported this when playing 1st time with my llvm-toolchain >> v3.6.0rc2 and mesa v10.3.7 [1]. >> The issue still remains in mesa v10.4.4. >> >> So,

I'm trying to find a way to emulate a floating point instruction, say a floating point add. My understanding is that in order to do that I need to execute setOperationAction(ISD::FADD, (MVT::f32, Expand); setOperationAction(ISD::FADD, (MVT::f64, Expand); in MyTargetISelLowering.cpp, MyTargetLowering::MyTargetLowering(...). However for some reason I'm still seeing a floating point add in

Hi Justin , Thank you for the confirmation and we would like to know that ,going forward the clang has the support the gcc gcov format or use the -fprofile-instr-generate -fcoverage-mapping and get ride of gcov format . We are planing to customize the clang code coverage for embedded world ,before we start tweaking the gcov / -fprofile-instr-generate code-base ,we would like to take feedback

> In conclusion: > Why are people using Git disadvantaged? Short answer: because of git-svn and differences between what is a tag in git and svn. Long answer: git-svn never created proper git tags. Instead, it converted svn tags to branches (because technically branches and tags are same in svn). These branches were orphan and not usable for bunch of things (I believe Takumi can provide a

Hi Lang, I'm looking at extending the compilation passes used in the LLILC JIT and it seems like the simplest thing is to make a copy of the SimpleCompiler functor into the LLILC code and then modify it for the phases I want to run. But I was wondering if this was the best approach. Do you expect different clients to create their own compiler functors or do you imagine that SimpleCompiler

Umesh Kalappa <umesh.kalappa0 at gmail.com> writes: > Hi Justin , > > Thank you for the confirmation and we would like to know that ,going > forward the clang has the support the gcc gcov format or use the > -fprofile-instr-generate -fcoverage-mapping and get ride of gcov > format . Going forward, the -fprofile-instr-generate -fcoverage-mapping (which I'll refer to as

That might work. I'm actually particularly interested in your perspective here, so even if it doesn't, I had already planned to specifically email you to make sure I got your thoughts here. But maybe a conference call would work. By far the easiest is for us to do a Google hangout, which would give video and audio. Would that work on your end? On Thu, Jul 30, 2015, 08:50 Russell Hadley

(background) The CoreCLR expects a JIT to produce a MSIL bytecode offset to code offset mapping annotated with a few extra bits denoting if it’s prolog/epilog, or it’s a call, or if there’s operands remaining on the MSIL virtual stack in some cases. Our initial prototype has the MSIL offset stashed in the line number field. We could stash the extra bits in the column info but that’s starting to

Chandler has it right. Our intent is to upstream everything. The MS fork will be used as a staging area for LLVM changes as we work to get them upstreamed. Tactically we're merging the MS fork everyday with mainline to try and stay close. We're still ramping up right now, and trying to figure out how best to work day to day, but our over arching goal is to enable (mainline) LLVM to be

The LLILC project does not require direct interaction with the PDB, so it’s not part of our plans. The JIT uses a special reporting format to communicate debug info (frame info and machine->IL mappings) back to the CoreCLR EE. The debugger joins this with the frontend-produced debug information (IL->source and logical frame offset->local, which is in a PDB) to complete the picture.

Hello, given %TestArrayPtr = global %struct.test* getelementptr ( [10 x %struct.test]* %TestArray, .......... %TestArray = weak global [10 x %struct.test] zeroinitialize my backend produce data declaration in the same order, so TestArrayPtr refers to TestArray before TestArray itself is defined. Is there a standard way to get the right ordering. I wrote my own code, but

Hi Asit, thanks for the reply. But I guess I was not clear in my question. Actually, i dont want to use __ATTRIBUTE__((ANNOTATE("MOVIATTR"))), since in documentation it is stated that "This intrinsic allows annotation of local variables with arbitrary strings. This can be useful for special purpose optimizations that want to look for these annotations. These have no other

Inline. From: Philip Reames [mailto:listmail at philipreames.com] Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 11:01 AM To: Swaroop Sridhar <Swaroop.Sridhar at microsoft.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> Cc: Joseph Tremoulet <jotrem at microsoft.com>; Andy Ayers <andya at microsoft.com>; Russell Hadley <rhadley at

Hi All, We trying to use clang+llvm to generate the gcc coverage format as clang version 3.6.0 $clang --coverage -Xclang -coverage-cfg-checksum -Xclang -coverage-no-function-names-in-data -Xclang -coverage-version='407*' test.c $a.out $llvm-cov gcov test.gcda Unexpected version: *704. Invalid .gcno File! Debugging the above cause ,But any hints from experts here ,will help a lot

Ok here is the breakdown. I am trying to impliment streaming into our game using openAL and ogg-vorbis. In the non-streaming function when I call ov_read on the file I should be streaming the buffer gets filled with the correct data. However, when I run ov_read on the same OggVorbis_File when I read the buffer gets filled with 0's. The buffer has not been zero'd and starts filled

Hi John, I have looked into the EmitAutoVarAlloca() in CGDecl.cpp. However, I could not figure out how to employ my custom attribute for code generation. For example, my custom attribute is visible in CGDecl.cpp but how can I generate based on my custom attribute if (D.hasAttr<myCustomAttri>()) { //What to do here? } What I wan in IR is something like below. Without Custom Attribute:

Philip: I think there are two separate issues: 1) Handling GC pointers stored in stack locations -- tracking their liveness, reporting them to the GC. etc. 2) Treating pointers to stack locations as GC-pointers. I think the two options that you presented here are for solving (1). I'm trying to solve issue (2) using alloca in addrspace(1). Basically, we want to create a pointer to a stack

> -----Original Message----- > From: Philip Reames [mailto:listmail at philipreames.com] > Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 9:38 AM > To: Swaroop Sridhar <Swaroop.Sridhar at microsoft.com>; llvm-dev <llvm- > dev at lists.llvm.org>; Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> > Cc: Joseph Tremoulet <jotrem at microsoft.com>; Andy Ayers > <andya at