similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm jit acting at runtime, like libgccjit ?

<div>Thanks James,</div><div>š</div><div>Kaleidoscope seems to differ in the sense that I cannot really understand how to create, say, a loop. It all looks like very complicated (<a

Hi Rajesh, The callee code looks okay to me > Assembly for check114 > --------------------------------------------------------------- > sub sp, sp, #16 > push {r11, lr} > mov r11, sp > sub sp, sp, #8 > str r3, [r11, #20] > str r2, [r11, #16] > str r1, [r11, #12] > ldr r1,

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130618/5b2a15e3/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 201306181656803_BEI0XT4N.gif Type: image/gif Size: 14036 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130618/5b2a15e3/attachment.gif>

> - "since ABI says the stack pointer needs to be 8 byte aligned at function entry point" (taken from Manman's reply) > What will be considered as entry point here? > Is it place of SP Adjustments "sub sp, sp, #16" > (Or) Is it place of first user instruction(end of prologue) "ldr r2, .LCPI0_0" Eight byte stack alignment is a

First, surely the right place for this discussion is the cfe-dev mailing list? Second, have you determined that this is a noticeable amount of time when compiling? I have no idea - in my Pascal compiler, parsing the code is ~0.1%, codegen to IR ~1.9% and LLVM 98%. But I'm sure Clang is more complex in many ways, so the proportion is probably a bit different - a measurement of the time spent

I hope this in the right list, but I was wondering if someone could help me with a VM I have that has lately started having problems. It had been running for years without problems. It's possible an update is causing this, but I can't say. The VM is running CentOS 5.8 and after a time, the machine begins to slow down. Things like pings or running commands lag. If I reboot the VM, it runs

<div>Is there any chance to create feature request for that useful functionality?</div><div>š</div><div>02.07.2015, 14:03, "Rusty Newton" <rnewton@digium.com>:</div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div><div>On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 4:46 AM, <span><<a href="mailto:royj@yandex.ru"

Hello, folks! Currently me with one other guy are trying to play with clang. The proposal may seem stupid, excuse me, if it was already discussed, we just want to try to implement something useful which seems absent for now. Ok, the idea. It seems interesting to try to make lexer a little bit more efficient in terms of macro expanding by applying partial expansion of macros. the idea is that

<br />Hello, <br />Ecx is a problem because you have to xor it. Which is avoided in the gcc compilation. Fomit-pointer-frame helps.<br /><br />Now llvm is one instruction from gcc. If ecx was not used, it would be as fast.<br />-- <br />Sent from Yandex.Mail for mobile<br /><br />20:03, 13 July 2015, Matthias Braun <mbraun@apple.com>:<br

<div>Thanks for the tip. Our goal is to know that call-limit is triggered. And later analyze this info, maybe do some action.</div><div>Yes, we can parse CDRs or execute AGI script but we do not want inmplement this logic on Asterisk because it can affectš<span>performance.</span></div><div>š</div><div>02.07.2015, 15:31, "jg"

Hello folks, Although Jack graciously permitted me to keep tinkering on the Postfish alongside OggFile work ;-) allowing it to sit there in a partially tinkered state continued to be a distraction. So yesterday and today I cleaned up the source repository and put together a prerelease. With this prerelease, I'm putting the project out of mind until I put out a beta of OggFile. Actually,

Hello folks, Although Jack graciously permitted me to keep tinkering on the Postfish alongside OggFile work ;-) allowing it to sit there in a partially tinkered state continued to be a distraction. So yesterday and today I cleaned up the source repository and put together a prerelease. With this prerelease, I'm putting the project out of mind until I put out a beta of OggFile. Actually,

Hi, all Is there someway ability to insert custom Header to "SIP 486" message, when HANGUP application is invoked? Our use case is to set that Header, when call-limit is reached, to analyze elsewhere, but we do not want to set some custom causecode in HANGUP application because this can confuse a calling equipment.

Hoi folks, I don't like to post in newsletter because of several reason but sometimes it isn't evitable. I am setting up a internet-radio-show (exclusively live, including 2 video-streams) and I want to read out the audio-metadata of momentarily played tracks in realtime to compare it against a SQL-database. The aim is to fill up and/or update a table with 'most played'

Hello, I have an issue with the llvm optimizations. I need to create object codes. the -ON PURPOSE poor && useless- code : --------------------------------------------------- #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int ci(int a){ return 23; } int flop(int a, char ** c){ a += 71; int b = 0; if (a == 56){ b = 69; b += ci(a); } puts("ok"); return a +

I try do use one of the images available from [1] These images comes in two flavors, one vmx, one ovf. I do not know how to convert one of these to centos6-libvirt-kvm virt-convert gives me an error $ virt-convert -i ovf -o virt-image path_to_image.ovf ERROR Couldn't convert disks: Disk conversion failed with exit status 1: qemu-img: Could not open 'path_to_image.vmdk' The vmdk

Hi all, We recently upgrade from CentOS 5.8 to CentOS 5.9 on kernel-xen-2.6.18-348.3.1.el5, and after booting into the new kernel, noted large amounts of these messages every second or so in the logs: Mar 30 21:38:35 atlas2 kernel: Warning Timer ISR/0: Time went backwards: delta=-1393683849 delta_cpu=22316151 shadow=225003685197135 off=129240997 processed=225005208029053

[Moved from -current to -stable] ???????? 21 ???????? 2006 16:23, Matthew Dillon ?? ????????: > ? ? You might be doing just writes to the mmap()'d memory, but the system > ? ? doesn't know that. Actually, it does. The program tells it, that I don't care to read, what's currently there, by specifying the PROT_READ flag only. > ? ? The moment you touch any mmap()'d

I am interested in putting together a tool which can verify that an external declaration conforms with the actual definition. A.c: extern int32_t foo(); Int bar() { return foo(); } B.c: int64_t foo() { ... } I had thought that I could use the debug information but the debug information in A.o does not include the type of the declaration "foo", just the type of bar. Is there a way to

As I was running "R CMD check" on one of my older packages (matlab), I was attempting to fix one of the NOTEs which bitches about attempting to change the search path using require(). In my case, I am repeating a package dependency for "methods" package in my .onLoad() function. Can this scenario (based on something B. Ripley discussed many years ago) no longer occur? Just