similar to: [LLVMdev] [x86] Compiling in 32-bit mode causes 64-bit asm source to be silently converted to its 32-bit equavilent

Hi I am modifying X86RetpolineThunks.cpp. X86RetpolineThunks.cpp 's location is llvm-src/lib/Target/X86. Which target should I use , next time use clang test.c , I can see the difference . I found that "make llc" doesn't work. And either "make LLVMX86CodeGen" doen't work. "make clang" waste a lot of time, even -j64. Every time modifying the file

Mike Silbersack wrote: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Scott Long wrote: > > >>Patches have been floated on the mailing list that revert PAE in its >>various stages. Maybe those need to be brought back up. Silby? Tor? >> >>Scott > > > I believe that Tor's commit on August 30th resolved the PAE-related > problems, so there is no need for a reversion.

I am attempting to create an instruction which takes a single 64-bit immediate. This doesn't seem like a thing that would exist already (because who needs an instruction which just takes an immediate?) How might I implement this easily? Perhaps I could use a format which encodes a register, which is then unused? Thanks for the help. Gus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

On 23 May 2013, at 13:51, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > I got a CMake warning telling me that the variable for specifying the toolchain file was unused when I set it on the command line, and none of the variables were propagated. It's been about a month since I tried though, so it may have been fixed. I get that warning, but it works anyway. Some of the

Is it possible to install and run Netscape whitout having access to a native windows. -- Best regard, Svend Bjerrum Jensen http://www.sbj.esenet.dk

Hi! Does Microsoft Encarta (I have the '99 Version) run with wine? What about Multimedia CDROMs in general? Ulli

Hi, I'm looking over the Wine documentation, and it says that the particular version that looks like it will work with my version of RedHat 7.1 will only work if the glibcc is 2.2 or above. How do I tell? I"m a newbie and not sure exactly what the glibcc is. TIA

When I run a macro that uses RExcel, I get a dialog box that says "Microsoft Excel is waiting for another application to complete an OLE action." There is no error in the RExcel commands in the macro, of that I am sure. The box appears to be related to the inclusion of RunRFile commands. The macro will run through the second RunRFile command, but will not execute the

Hi all, I''m running some tests with netem and I noticed some strange behaviour that looks like a bug: I''m pinging another machine and adding delay with netem. When I tell netem to give me a 10ms delay, it works fine. The problem is that when I ask for a 11ms delay, it gives me 20ms! It happens for any value between 11ms an 20ms, and it repeats for values over 20ms, now

Hi Daniel, attached is a patch that pushes most of the object file specific parsing out of AsmParser and down into MachOAsmParser. This was done as a cleanup for the ELF work. I know that you're not happy with this approach, particularly the fact that as we add more object file formats and assembler dialects, it's going to cause a class explosion. But I was hoping that we could use this

Copy Ii32 in X86InstrFormats.td rename to Ii64 and change Imm32 to Imm64. Instantiate your instruction inheriting from Ii64. Pass RawFrm to the form parameter. Initial documentation for the encoding system is attached. ~Craig On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Gus Smith via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I am attempting to create an instruction which takes a single

(Tested using a Linux bzImage, with and without an initrd.) Per shuffle_and_boot documentation, %ecx must contain the descriptor list byte length, but it's set with such list end address instead. Fix. Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwish.07 at gmail.com> -- core/bcopy32.inc | 2 ++ core/bcopyxx.inc | 2 ++ core/bootsect.inc | 8 +++++--- core/runkernel.inc |

Hi All, I fear starting another centi-thread on this but I'll give it a shot. We're currently supporting two build systems which is definitely one more than we (or I) want to support. I don't know of any support in autoconf past the --host/--build/--target case that's not supported in cmake. I'll send out an assertion here that this support isn't necessary and any system

Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> --- AUTHORS | 17 ++++++ README | 10 +++ conf/ovirt-agent | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-db-omatic | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-host-browser | 12 ++++