similar to: [LLVMdev] Why buildbot sanitizer-ppc64-linux1 blames r239459?

Hi All, I'm trying to reproduce a failure on llvm-ppc64-linux1 (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-ppc64-linux1/builds/5382) and llvm-ppc64-linux2 builders caused by one of my patches yesterday. Some of the CodeGen/Hexagon tests failed to compile with stack dump problem. I tried to configure and build LLVM for PowerPC on my machine locally but don't see the failures. I had to remove

This long running bot failed on a unused variable warning. Given that several other bots cover the warnings, any chance we could get this one configured to not fail the build on warnings? Doing so would make it more likely to actually get to the "sanitizer" part of the testing process. Philip -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: buildbot failure in LLVM on

On 10/29/2015 07:40 AM, Bill Seurer wrote: > On 10/28/15 23:47, Philip Reames via llvm-dev wrote: > > This long running bot failed on a unused variable warning. Given that > > several other bots cover the warnings, any chance we could get this one > > configured to not fail the build on warnings? Doing so would make it > > more likely to actually get to the

On 08/26/2015 09:46 AM, Philip Reames wrote: > On 08/26/2015 09:41 AM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Renato Golin >> <renato.golin at linaro.org <mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> wrote: >> >> On 26 August 2015 at 17:39, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com >> <mailto:dblaikie at

I am seeing a couple of new test failures with gcc 6.1.0 on aarch64 in Release mode. Debug mode works. They work with gcc 8.2.0 in Release mode. What compiler(s) do the Builbot builders use? Presumably if we use the same compiler(s) we should see the same testing result. I'm trying to isolate the problem and it would be good to run a sanity check to get a baseline. I looked through zorg

why do you not simply shut up? # sieve rule require ["imap4flags"]; # rule:[reindl] if allof (header :contains "From" "h.reindl at thelounge.net") { setflag ["\\Seen","\\Flagged"]; stop; }

Ok, guys... Please be gentle with me. I have what is going to be the strangest question you will have ever heard, but I have no idea what to tell this person. I set up Asterisk 3 or 4 weeks ago, everything is running smooth. My receptionist has told me on two different occasions that she tried to transfer a call by pressing "#", and she heard a buzz noise in the phone and the

Hiya, I''m trying to track down some throughput latency that our customer seems to be attributing to our product, I can''t see what he''s talking about, but I want to try and get some deeper granularity than I might get with something like smokeping, and maybe even see if its down to something tunable on our end. I''ve been looking for some examples on how

On 08/24/2016 07:53 PM, Peter wrote: > On 25/08/16 13:21, Kay Schenk wrote: >> To all...yes I meant glibc, not glib. Target environment -- could be any >> version of Linux. This is for Apache OpenOffice. The buildbots we've been >> using are being decommisioned due to EOL. As a developer on that project, I >> need to be able to test and use the builds. We'll be

We're running Samba 2.2.2 on an S/390 mainframe and have been experiencing problems with Samba seeming to access an invalid memory location. Below is part of the message log: Feb 15 10:48:38 linux1 kernel: VM_GROWSDOWN not set, but address 0 Feb 15 10:48:38 linux1 kernel: not in vma 0106a960 (start 400000 end 53A000) Feb 15 10:48:38 linux1 kernel: User process fault:

On 08/25/2016 10:44 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 08/25/2016 09:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> I do realize the sane thing to do is to have the builbots -- >> smoketest environments -- match the production environment > > > I think the sane thing to do would be to use buildbots that support LSB: > > http://www.ludism.org/~rwhe/LSB/tutorial/tut.html Great resource!

more messages in the other node of the cluster.../var/log/messages. ======== Jun 1 19:05:59 linux2 kernel: cdrom: open failed. Jun 1 19:05:59 linux2 kernel: cdrom: open failed. Jun 1 19:09:35 linux2 kernel: OCFS2 Node Manager 0.99.10-BETA14 Tue May 31 23:34:42 EDT 2005 (build 82257c19fee200eff2ba31569613b46a) Jun 1 19:09:35 linux2 kernel: OCFS2 DLM 0.99.10-BETA14 Tue May 31 23:34:43 EDT 2005

more messages in the other node of the cluster.../var/log/messages. ======== Jun 1 19:05:59 linux2 kernel: cdrom: open failed. Jun 1 19:05:59 linux2 kernel: cdrom: open failed. Jun 1 19:09:35 linux2 kernel: OCFS2 Node Manager 0.99.10-BETA14 Tue May 31 23:34:42 EDT 2005 (build 82257c19fee200eff2ba31569613b46a) Jun 1 19:09:35 linux2 kernel: OCFS2 DLM 0.99.10-BETA14 Tue May 31 23:34:43 EDT 2005

I was able to get the source code for ocfs2 and compile it. This worked and created the necessary .ko files Now I have to figure out why gnu parted 1.6.15 has bugs. when I try a partprobe on a partitioned firewire maxtor drive mount -t ocfs2 /dev/sdb1 /u01/oradata/orcl It says no such device.... Any ideas anyone?... Regards, Mandar Vengurlekar ----- Original Message ----- From: Mandar P

I have noticed an inconsistency with the behavior of linux smbfs mounting a remote win2k server while a file is open for writing: 1) If a linux process opens a file that /doesn't exist/ on the win2k server, while the file is open, other machines trying to read the file give the usual 'Text file is busy' (linux) or 'file is in use by another process'

Hi list, This is driving me to distraction. I have installed the 3.0.14a RPMS on SLES8, and am following chapter 9 of the 'By Example' documentation, to migrate from an NT domain to a Samba domain backed by LDAP. I have followed the instructions up to the point where I enter: net rpc join -S pdc_it -U Administrator%password Unfortunately, this responds with: Creation of workstation

Dear friends, I have two Linux servers "Linux1" and Linux2" I like to mount a folder of Linux2 on Linux1 Whenever I try to mount the folder with #mount -t smbfs //Linux2/myshare /otherpc #password I give the root password and also tried other users password It gives following error: 8450: session setup failed : ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad Password - name/ password pair in a Tree

I am using the 'backup to a central backup server with 7 day incremental' example to archive three separate computers to identically configured (apart from name) shares on a Western Digital 'MyBookLive' NAS which has rsync enabled. The backup from two Raspberry Pi Computers operates without a problem but the backup from a Fedora 32 computer fails with an 'unknown module

My dom0 is uing Centos 5.2 x64. I have just upgraded Xen from 3.3.0 to 3.3.1. After upgraded, I find that I cannot hotplug additional vcpu anymore. I have a domU "linux1" which is a paravirtualized vm with centos 5.2. I try to "xm vcpu-set linux1 4", it does not have any error message, but those vcpu cannot be displayed. I also tried to add vcpu using "virsh setvcpus

When a certain user tries to access shared folder provided by Samba, his account is always locked. I can't figure out where the problem is. Please help. --Masahiko Detail: We're using Active Directory by Windows 2000 Servers and use it for samba's authentication. When a certain domain user, say, MYDOMAIN\user1, tries to access to the remote resource \\LINUX1\user1 on a Linux server