similar to: [LLVMdev] struct type parament

Hi Mehdi, Thanks for your reply. It seems caused by random rename because I saw %struct.StructTyName.692.475*, which might be twice renaming. Does this collision occur because this type is declared more than once? I encountered this problem when used clang to compile transmission 1.42 (http://download.transmissionbt.com/files/) with configuration: "./configure --disable-gtk". Then

I tried to compare two types. Because of renaming, the comparison result is not as expected. How to deal with renaming while comparing types? Best, Haopeng On 6/2/15 4:09 PM, Mehdi Amini wrote: > Hi Haopeng, > > One more element, I just noticed you are using LTO, I am not sure how it is implemented but my guess is that there is a shared LLVMContext. If multiple files include this

Oh, got it. Thanks for your explain. I misunderstand what getLocation does. If I would like to get the result of alias analysis referring to the stored value, what should I do in llvm? On 2/16/15 1:42 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Haopeng Liu" <hyliuhp at gmail.com> >> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> >>

Hi All, It seems that functions in callgraph remove all metadata info, such as dbg. Can I keep metadata in callgraph? Best, Haopeng

Yes, in my example, %1 and %2 point to t. %3 points to t2. But t and t2 point to the same var, is it? That's where I'm confused. On 2/16/15 12:37 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Haopeng Liu" <hyliuhp at gmail.com> >> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> >> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >> Sent:

Hi, I'm trying to explore basicaa alias analysis. test.c: int main() { int a; int *p, *q; p = &a; q = p; ... } Commands: clang -emit-llvm -c -g -O0 test.c -o test.bc opt -basicaa -print-must-aliases test.bc However, the result shows that p and q are no alias. Could anyone explain it? Your help is much appreciated! -Haopeng

t and t2 are two pointers defined in .c file. The definitions in .bc are: %thd = alloc i64, align 8 %t = alloca i64*, align 8 %t2 = alloca i64*, align 8 .c file likes this: int thd; int *t = &thd; int *t2 = t; On 2/16/15 12:28 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Haopeng Liu" <hyliuhp at gmail.com> >> To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu

Hi all, I am implementing a pass which needs aliasanalysis in llvm. My pass firstly records all store or load instructions as follows: loc[cnt++] = AA.getLocation(si/li); Then, get each pairwise alias result. AliasAnalysis::AliasResult ar = AA.alias(loc[i], loc[j]); switch(ar){ case 0,1,2,3;} And the command is: opt -load mypass.so -mypass -basicaa test.bc The store/load in test.bc: (1):

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/fwd/productviewnation.php?pil=OKXZFPOKX&version= 0 can anyone suggest how I could set up asterisk@home to read out allowed the following text when I dial extension 850? 815 PM EST WED FEB 16 2005 .OVERNIGHT...MOSTLY CLEAR. LOWS 30 TO 35. NORTHWEST WINDS 15 TO 20 MPH WITH GUSTS UP TO 30 MPH...DIMINISHING TO 10 TO 15 MPH LATE. .THURSDAY...PARTLY CLOUDY. COOLER

Using Samba 2.2.5 on FreeBSD 4.5. We have a file share used by several people working on common projects. The share is set up with force group = cad create mask = 0774 force create mode = 0774 directory mask = 0775 force directory mode = 0775 so that everyone can create/modify any file in the share. The new VFS recycle bin, however, sets the file

I'm trying to generate an R interface for a library that's commonly used and I'm currently writing wrapper functions for file i/o and return an object (list?) that contains the elements of the C structure. For example, reading a file that contains: struct CONFIG_RECORD { char coeffs_filename[256]; char species_filename[256]; unsigned long

Hi All, I tried to use CallGraph in llvm by adding "AU.addRequired<CallGraph>();" in getAnalysisUsage function. But it reports an error: include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:56:39: error: ‘ID’ is not a member of ‘llvm::CallGraph’ return addRequiredID(PassClass::ID); How to use it correctly? Thanks, Haopeng

Got it, thanks. But in my pass, I use function name to locate. Can I disable mangling in clang? Best, Haopeng On 3/1/15 10:44 PM, John Criswell wrote: > On 3/1/15 11:38 PM, Haopeng Liu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I compile a .cpp with cmd: >> clang++ -emit-llvm -c -g -O0 -w pbzip2.cpp -o pbzip2.bc -lbz2 >> llvm-dis pbzip2.bc >> >> One function in .cpp is

Hi llvm-dev, Our code base has a ancient copy of llvm (ver 3.5.1), and it uses the LLVM code gen for some domain-specific language. The previous dev left a global lock around the usage of LLVM code gen stating that because LLVM code gen can only be accessed single-threaded it needs to be protected with this global lock. But now this lock has caused some perf issues as we pretty much lose

Hi, I compile a .cpp with cmd: clang++ -emit-llvm -c -g -O0 -w pbzip2.cpp -o pbzip2.bc -lbz2 llvm-dis pbzip2.bc One function in .cpp is consumer_decompress. However, I look inside pbzip2.ll. The function name is changed to "define i8* @_Z19consumer_decompressPv(i8* %q) #0 {" Why clang adds a "_Z19" prefix and "Pv" suffix? Thanks,

Thank you Johannes, I looked it up and it seems that we're creating one LLVMContext per compilation "unit", not sure if that matters. i.e. there's no single globally shared LLVMContext object. Is LLVMContext *the* concurrency isolation (or unit) here? On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 6:34 PM Doerfert, Johannes <jdoerfert at anl.gov> wrote: > Do you use one llvm context or one

On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 12:12:34AM -0500, John Criswell wrote: > On 3/2/15 12:07 AM, Haopeng Liu wrote: > >Got it, thanks. But in my pass, I use function name to locate. Can I > >disable mangling in clang? > > No, but you can probably fine a library that can either mangle the original > name or demangle the name you're seeing in the LLVM bitcode. > > As an FYI,

From: Sylvain Gault <sylvain.gault at gmail.com> Despite having native network capabilities, UEFI 2.4 (the most widely deployed at the moment) has no native DNS resolver. I propose here an implementation more or less inspired by the one found in core/legacynet/dnsresolv.c. Since it's non-trivial, I'd like to ask for a deep review of this code. I tried to make it as strong as

Hi All, How to write a link time optimization pass in llvm with LTO? Is there a document, just like http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html tells us how to write a llvm pass? Thanks,

Several people on this list have reported issues with the linker regarding a named StructType instance with the same name in two different modules being resolved into two StructTypes with different names due to StructType:: setName(…) collision behavior. Looking at BitcodeReader::ParseTypeTableBody(…), I don't see use of LLVMContextImpl::NamedStructTypes or of Module::getTypeByName(…). Nor do