similar to: [LLVMdev] Beignet Backend as an LLVM Target

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Beignet Backend as an LLVM Target"

2016 Apr 25
2
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries
Chandler, Thank you for getting it up to ML top. I believe we have to move broader than that you just mentioned. The natural separation of the infrastructure into different parts can be across the following lines: - the parallel model of programming - these can be OpenMP, OpenACC, CilkPlus, OpenCL, StreamExecutor, CUDA, C++ parallel extensions, etc. - the offloading machinery to be used by any
2017 Nov 09
1
Windows server 2003 domain authentication with Samba version 4.7.0-git.23.4e3f0fb9d15SUSE-oS13.3-x86_64
Dear Samba experts, IO would like to ask for help with diagnose why my Samba version 4.7.0-git. 23.4e3f0fb9d15SUSE-oS13.3-x86_64 in openSUSE Tumbleweed can not authentificate me on Windows server 2003 domain in /etc/fstab I have working combination - smb version only vorks if set to 1.0 //192.168.1.131/shares /home/fodrek/shares cifs credentials=/home/fodrek/
2017 Nov 10
5
Windows server 2003 domain authentication with Samba version 4.7.0-git.23.4e3f0fb9d15SUSE-oS13.3-x86_64
Dear Mr. Cardon! Na štvrtok, 9. novembra 2017 18:29:03 CET Denis Cardon via samba napísali: > > > IO would like to ask for help with diagnose why my Samba version > > 4.7.0-git. > > 23.4e3f0fb9d15SUSE-oS13.3-x86_64 in openSUSE Tumbleweed can not > > authentificate me on Windows server 2003 domain > > > > in /etc/fstab I have working combination - smb
2013 May 27
1
[LLVMdev] C++ into C code conversion
Dear Mr. Chisnall! thank you for you help V Nedeľa, 26. máj 2013 o 15:33 +0100, David Chisnall napísal(a): > On 26 May 2013, at 14:42, Peter Fodrek-CHELLO <peter.fodrek at chello.sk> wrote: > > > We have same problem that we are to port third party C++ user space code > > into Linux kernel code where is only available to use C source code. > If you want to get your
2015 Jul 27
2
[LLVMdev] a question about pooalloc
Hello, today I download poolalloc from " https://github.com/llvm-mirror/poolalloc". and I compiled it with LLVM3.3. Then when I excute "make",I get the error: AddressTakenAnalysis.cpp:18:30:fatal error:llvm/IR/CallSite.h: No such file or directory. ​I correct the path of callsite.h to "llvm/Support/Callsite.h". there is another error: AddressTakenAnalysis.cpp:In
2014 Aug 18
8
[LLVMdev] C Backend Ressurected
Hi All, 2 of my summer interns (Aimee Dipietro and Greg Simpson) used their time over the summer to resurrect the LLVM C Backend: https://github.com/draperlaboratory/llvm-cbe Improvements include recovery of simple for/while loops (instead of goto), better variable naming, inline asm support, and making it work on a more recent version of llvm. I believe they used the repository here as a
2013 Dec 16
2
[LLVMdev] Question about Pre-RA-schedule in LLVM3.3
At 2013-12-15 22:43:34,"Caldarale, Charles R" <Chuck.Caldarale at unisys.com> wrote: >> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] >> On Behalf Of Haishan >> Subject: [LLVMdev] Question about Pre-RA-schedule in LLVM3.3 > >> My clang version is 3.3 and debug build. > >> //test.c >> int a[6] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
2013 Sep 16
2
[LLVMdev] CMake problem of LLVM 3.3
Hi, Guys: I'm new for LLVM. Just downloaded the LLVM. I used cmake to compiler the LLVM3.3, but found an error, because it can not automatically compiler the target description file (*.td) to the .inc file. But when I tried the LLVM 3.2, It is ok. Could your give me some suggestion? Regards' Xun -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2013 Dec 21
0
[LLVMdev] Question about Pre-RA-schedule in LLVM3.3
The flag -enable-aa-sched-mi should do what you want you want in the MachineScheduler pass. If you want to do it in the selection DAG, there is a subtarget hook that might do it: TargetSubtargetInfo::useAA() LLVM won’t generate the schedule you want anyway for Intel core processors, but the alias analysis can be useful in general. -Andy On Dec 16, 2013, at 6:03 AM, Haishan <hndxvon at
2016 Apr 25
2
[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries
I can't comment on all the things not directly used by llvm community, but I feel pretty strongly that 1) An independent project like liboffload should exist ; which 2) Projects like SE and OpenMP should both be using it ; and further 3) SE shouldn't just do their own thing because they haven't figured out how to make it work with other projects that already have some overlapping
2013 Dec 15
3
[LLVMdev] Question about Pre-RA-schedule in LLVM3.3
Hi, I compile a case (test.c) to get object machine file (test.o) using clang as follows: "clang -target arm -integrated-as -c test.c -o test.o" My clang version is 3.3 and debug build. //test.c int a[6] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} int main() { a[0] = a[5]; a[1] = a[4]; a[2] = a[5]; } //end test.c Then test.dump is generated by using the objdump tool. //test.dump ldr r1, [r0, #20]
2014 Jul 21
2
[LLVMdev] VMKit build problems; can't use LLVM3.4.2 ?
Greetings, I've been using LLVM and Clang for some time, but I'm new to the list and new to VMKit; please advise if I should post this elsewhere. VMKit doesn't seem to build with LLVM/Clang 3.4.2 -- seems that one must use LLVM3.3. I see the following error: VmkitGCPrinter.cpp:363:53: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 2, have 3
2013 Dec 15
0
[LLVMdev] Question about Pre-RA-schedule in LLVM3.3
> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of Haishan > Subject: [LLVMdev] Question about Pre-RA-schedule in LLVM3.3 > My clang version is 3.3 and debug build. > //test.c > int a[6] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} > int main() { >  a[0] = a[5]; >  a[1] = a[4]; >  a[2] = a[5]; > } > //end test.c > Then test.dump is
2014 Sep 11
3
[LLVMdev] patch for DragonEgg 3.3
Hi - attached is a patch to enable building DragonEgg (x86_64) for LLVM3.3 and LLVM3.4. That is, add these changes to the 3.3 release, and it becomes possible to build DragonEgg against a llvm3.4 compiler. Regards, Richard Gorton Cognitive Electronics rcgorton at cog-e.com ---------- -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name:
2013 Sep 16
0
[LLVMdev] CMake problem of LLVM 3.3
Hi Xun, On 16/09/13 03:42, Xun Chen wrote: > Hi, Guys: > > I'm new for LLVM. Just downloaded the LLVM. > I used cmake to compiler the LLVM3.3, but found an error, because it can > not automatically compiler the target description file (*.td) to the .inc file. > But when I tried the LLVM 3.2, It is ok. > Could your give me some suggestion? your description
2013 Oct 29
1
[LLVMdev] undefined symbol: _ZTIN4llvm10ModulePassE
I have a MdoulePass which compiles and runs fine with LLVM3.1. Then I wanted to upgrade to LLVM3.3, it compiles and links fine, but when you run it by "opt -load /path/to/.so", it shows this message: undefined symbol: _ZTIN4llvm10ModulePassE which means undefined symbol: llvm::ModulePass after demangling. Googled for a while and still no clue. Anybody have an idea? Thanks, Welson
2014 Oct 28
2
[LLVMdev] DragonEgg3.3 support for gcc cross compilers
I am using a gcc (v 4.8.2) cross compiler for the tilera architecture. There is an LLVM (v 3.3) cross compiler available for tilera ( http://tilera.github.io/llvm), but the frontend only has partial support for certain tilera intrinsics and no OpenMP support. Hence, I have decided to use DragonEgg (v 3.3) to resolve this. I was able to build DragonEgg, but when I pass the command line argument
2013 Dec 14
1
[LLVMdev] How to build a map between IR Instruction and MachineInstrs?
Hi, Thanks for your answer. I am looking for a map, and the data structure of this map is map<const Instruction *, vector<MachineInstr*> > In this map, its keyvalue is IR instruction pointer, and its second value is a container which is composed of MachineInstr lowering by its keyvalue. For example: IR Instruction %0 = load i32* getelementptr inbounds ([6 x i32]* @a, i32 0,
2013 Apr 29
1
[LLVMdev] LowerDbgDeclare results in redeclaration of local variable
Hi Eric,   Thanks for patch information. I have checked the patch with my code and I see that it works. But when I extract the variable and check the metadata information to retrieve the scope information, I do not get exact scope, after optimization. As you said that this is a work in progress, so can we expect full version on this in llvm3.3 release ?   Regards, Pankaj  
2014 Oct 28
3
[LLVMdev] DragonEgg3.3 support for gcc cross compilers
No. The gcc cross compiler being used (tilera-gcc) is indeed 64-bit. Thanks On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Anton Korobeynikov < anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > Looks like your gcc is 32-bit and you're trying to load 64-bit plugin. > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Ajay Panyala <ajay.panyala at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Brian, > > > >