Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] enabling openmp cmake build in llvm tree"
2017 Nov 25
2
PSA: debuginfo-tests workflow changing slightly
Hi Zachary:
I was able to reproduce the greendragon results locally (OSX), and fix the
problem by excluding 'debuginfo-tests' from check-clang -- this prevents
them from being added twice, once for check-clang and again for
check-debuginfo.
Below are the minimized patches I used to reproduce and fix the problem --
based on your originals.
I've verified these patches work when
2017 Dec 06
2
PSA: debuginfo-tests workflow changing slightly
> On Dec 6, 2017, at 10:10 AM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:
>
> Adrian, Mike, Chris? Any update on this? I've temporarily switched to working on something different, but I plan to be back on this in a couple of weeks. It's been a month since my first revert of this CL, which seems like a reasonable amount of lead-time to deal with issues surrounding
2017 Dec 06
3
PSA: debuginfo-tests workflow changing slightly
> On Dec 6, 2017, at 10:21 AM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:
>
> Can I have some assurance that if it fails again, someone will look into who has access to the builders so I don't have to keep doing speculative commits?
Sure. I did this last time and I promise to also do it this time.
-- adrian
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 10:13 AM Adrian Prantl
2010 Feb 15
1
[LLVMdev] Broken CMake file?
Hi there.
I was trying to rebuild LLVM, this time with Clang, and after getting the
last svn version, I got this error during cmake:
CMake Error: Error in cmake code at
<dir>/llvm/projects/CMakeLists.txt:7:
Parse error. Function missing ending ")". Instead found left paren with
text "(".
The line is "if(NOT (${entry} STREQUAL
2014 May 13
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] CMake add_version_info_from_vcs SVN_REPOSITORY
This will be used by Clang to show full build information when
LLVM_APPEND_VC_REV is enabled and LLVM/Clang are built from Git.
Also try to figure-out repository URL and revision from Git mirror parsing
git-svn-id: footer from last commit (if present).
---
cmake/modules/VersionFromVCS.cmake | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git
2018 Jan 25
1
[RFC] Handling cmake policies
Currently, cmake policies are manually maintained by each project. This is
done via a set of `cmake_policy()` commands following the initial
`cmake_minimum_required()` command at the top of each CMakeLists.txt
project file.
Somewhat surprisingly, these sets are local to each project and independent
of each other -- even for in-tree builds containing multiple
sub-projects. This
is because cmake
2015 Apr 30
2
[LLVMdev] libiomp, not libgomp as default library linked with -fopenmp
On 30 April 2015 at 10:06, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to resurrect the discussion on replacing libgomp with
>> libiomp as the default OpenMP runtime library linked with -fopenmp.
>>
>>
>> For reference, the previous discussion is accessible there:
>>
2015 May 01
2
[LLVMdev] libiomp, not libgomp as default library linked with -fopenmp
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 10:46 AM Jack Howarth <
> howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:52 AM Andrey Bokhanko <
>>>
2015 May 01
3
[LLVMdev] libiomp, not libgomp as default library linked with -fopenmp
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:52 AM Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I'd like to resurrect the discussion on replacing libgomp with libiomp as
>> the default OpenMP runtime library linked with -fopenmp.
>>
>
> Just for
2015 May 01
4
[LLVMdev] libiomp, not libgomp as default library linked with -fopenmp
Chandler,
Thanks for the reply -- I always included you in libiomp supporters camp;
it is good to see I wasn't mistaken! ;-)
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
wrote:
> Is there no way to support libgomp here as well? I don't say this to hold
> up changing the defaults in any way, just curious. =]
>
No, sorry. libgomp doesn't
2015 Apr 30
2
[LLVMdev] libiomp, not libgomp as default library linked with -fopenmp
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Andrey Bokhanko" <andreybokhanko at gmail.com>
>> To: "cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "Douglas Gregor"
>> <dgregor at apple.com>,
2009 Aug 06
1
[LLVMdev] MSVC can't Inlcude *.inc files properly
I means visual studio c++ 2008, do you build clang+llvm with .sln
files, and these files are generated by cmake? I do of that. And
because vs c++ can't recognize path such a:/filepath/.. Properlyn it's
recognized as a:/filepath
So we need change /.. to /../ or /../.
2009/8/6, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org>:
> I don't understand this problem, I have built clang on
2015 May 06
3
[LLVMdev] libiomp, not libgomp as default library linked with -fopenmp
Chandler:
1) I completely agree with the comments some others have made about
us needing to make it clear that this isn't some Intel-only thing,
it’s the LLVM OpenMP runtime. Some suggestions that I think would
make sense to help here:
… code owner discussion elided since Chris has endorsed Andrey…
- Clearly updating the readme and such would be appropriate.
Certainly, no problem with
2015 May 01
5
[LLVMdev] libiomp, not libgomp as default library linked with -fopenmp
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:52 AM Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I'd like to resurrect the discussion on replacing libgomp with libiomp as
>> the default OpenMP runtime library linked with -fopenmp.
>>
>
> Just for
2015 May 02
3
[LLVMdev] libiomp, not libgomp as default library linked with -fopenmp
Jack,
Could you, please, submit a bug report? -- including steps to
reproduce (where you got imageMagick sources, how exactly you compiled
them, etc)
Andrey
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Jack Howarth
<howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Chandler,
2015 May 01
2
[LLVMdev] libiomp, not libgomp as default library linked with -fopenmp
Hal,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> We need to get the build system integration committed and the buildbots
> updated to compile it
>
If you are speaking on libiomp buidbots, they are already established:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/libiomp5-clang-x86_64-linux-debian
2017 Nov 22
2
PSA: debuginfo-tests workflow changing slightly
I sorta enjoy debugging stuff like this, so if you don't mind, I'll dig
into it once I get a chance -- traveling so, my access is a bit sketchy
right now.
I'll see if I can grab the logs and let you know if I find anything
interesting.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:
> That change was added specifically to workaround a failure
2015 Apr 30
17
[LLVMdev] libiomp, not libgomp as default library linked with -fopenmp
All,
I'd like to resurrect the discussion on replacing libgomp with libiomp as
the default OpenMP runtime library linked with -fopenmp.
For reference, the previous discussion is accessible there:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140217/thread.html#99461
We are very close to getting *full* OpenMP 3.1 specification supported in
clang (only one (!) clause is not
2012 Mar 18
11
New Wine
I have winebottle 1.2.3 installed which includes Wine but wonder it Wine 1.4 the latest stable version will update Wine. Also do I download the binary version or the other I am confused about all the options. Can anyone help please?
2014 Feb 06
4
[LLVMdev] compiler-rt CMake build
On 02/06/2014 08:12 AM, Alexey Samsonov wrote:
> Please note that it makes a lot of sense to built compiler-rt (and sanitizers) with just-built
> Clang. In fact, even though we should support building it with another compilers (gcc, MSVC),
> using just-built-Clang should be a default scenario, like it is in configure+make build.
This is possible with CMake using the ExternalProject