similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM 3.6 homebrew core formula

>(though i personally use the tap ones because the core ones do not support asan) Is there a particular reason why the core ones do not support asan? > > >On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Sebastian Blessing ><sebastian at causality.io> wrote: >> Dear LLVMers, >> >> I am working on a project that depends on LLVM 3.6. For Homebrew, the core >> formula

Hey Folks, It seems that Homebrew for some reason arbitrarily decided to banish all of the --devel flavors from all of their installable packages.  I couldn't find any discussion as to why or what they intend to replace the function with. **update;  this is where they decided to do this; https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/pull/5060#issuecomment-428149176 But in the meantime, 1.1pre17 is

Hi NSD developers, I submitted a merge request in Homebrew to update NSD to 4.10.0. The compile failed, and I don't know what the error means and how to fix it. Could one of you please take a look? https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/pull/175796 Regards, Anand

i am trying to install xml2 from CRAN, and it is throwing an error that it cannot find the libxml2 library configuration. The thing is that pkg-config seems to be set up correctly: $ echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH :/usr/local/opt/libxml2/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/local/opt/libxml2/lib/pkgconfig $ pkg-config --cflags --libs libxml-2.0 -I/usr/local/Cellar/libxml2/2.9.7/include/libxml2

Is there a recommended way to install R with homebrew? Will I completely lose the GUI? .r file command editor? thanks, Ty ----- Tyler Frazier Department of Transportation Planning and Telematics Technical University Berlin http://www.vsp.tu-berlin.de/ [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10179 Summary: massive test failure on OSX 10.8.5 under Homebrew Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: chdiza at gmail.com

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 18 February 2015 at 18:48, Jack Howarth > <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote: >> Define users. If compiler developers, your argument holds. For other >> users who just want a stable compiler, the argument does not. > > Ok, let's turn this conversation upside down.

> On 22 Feb 2023, at 5:33 pm, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks Aki, that was helpful. When I add that I get: >> >> checking for LIBSODIUM... no >> configure: error: Can't build with libsodium: not found >> >> So I have to tell it where libsodium is. >> >> Tried: >> >>

> On 22/02/2023 07:48 EET James Brown <jlbrown at bordo.com.au> wrote: > > > > On 22 Feb 2023, at 4:14 pm, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I?ve spent ages on this and am getting really desperate! :-( > > > > > > CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/homebrew/Cellar/openssl at 3/3.0.8/include

> On 22/02/2023 08:41 EET James Brown <jlbrown at bordo.com.au> wrote: > > > > On 22 Feb 2023, at 5:33 pm, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Aki, that was helpful. When I add that I get: > > > > > > checking for LIBSODIUM... no > > > configure: error: Can't build with libsodium: not

> On 22/02/2023 09:10 EET James Brown <jlbrown at bordo.com.au> wrote: > > > On 22 Feb 2023, at 5:53 pm, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > % locate libsodium > > > > > /opt/homebrew/Cellar/libsodium > > > > > /opt/homebrew/Cellar/libsodium/1.0.18_1

Hi list, for those interested: I''ve created a homebrew package provider for puppet. You can get it from https://github.com/jedi4ever/puppet-homebrew enjoy :) Patrick P.S. You need a newer version of puppet as it uses the new module structure -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email

I installed the ruby1.8.7 by macports. Yesterday, I updated the ruby into 1.9.1 by homebrew. But when I show the version (ruby -v),It still is 1.8.7. So I use brew link ruby,and replace the /opt/local/bin/ruby by /usr/local/Cellar/ ruby/1.9.1-p378/bin/ruby. It works. But command "ri" is not work yet. Is there any way to use the ruby installed by homebrew? ,sorry for my english

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:30 PM Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote: > Paweł Bylica <chfast at gmail.com> writes: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:55 PM Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> > wrote: > > > > Paweł Bylica <chfast at gmail.com> writes: > > > I can confirm that the issue has been caused by NDEBUG flag. >

On Sep 9, 2014, at 7:12 AM, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: > This is happening because the ``LLVMConfigLibs`` makefile variable is > empty when used in ``cmake/modules/Makefile``. It is normally set in > Makefile.rules . However if you build with --enable-shared this > variable doesn't get set and so LLVMExports.cmake isn't generated > correctly. > >

I'm looking at an issue for Homebrew (OS X package manager) where the compiled libc++ tries to load libc++abi at "@rpath/libc++abi.1.dylib", resulting in a dyld error. The issue can be found at https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/issues/47149 From what I can tell, this is a result of lines 561-564 of the CMakeLists.txt in the main LLVM repo: set(CMAKE_BUILD_WITH_INSTALL_RPATH ON)

> On 22/02/2023 07:00 EET James Brown <jlbrown at bordo.com.au> wrote: > > > On 21 Feb 2023, at 10:12 pm, James Brown <jlbrown at bordo.com.au> wrote: > > > > > > > The new one has Dovecot compiled with same configure options, same configuration files, but fails to authenticate: > > > > Feb 21 21:51:03 master: Info: Dovecot v2.3.20

I''m working on Michael Hartl''s ruby on rails tutorial http://ruby.railstutorial.org/ruby-on-rails-tutorial-book#sec-development_tools . I installed Git, updated my OS to 10.8.2 and downloaded XCode 4.5.2. when I type in rvm install 1.9.3 this long thing comes up... Ruby (and needed base gems) for your selection will be installed shortly. Before it happens, please read and

Lukasz Sokol wrote: > but have you considered a web-managed config-builder such as FreePBX? > Instead of building your dialplan from scratch ? I've never used FreePBX, but, after having looked at its website, I think I have a general understanding of what it can do. What I don't understand is how FreePBX answers my question about the Linksys SPA3102 being good for a mission

I think you are mixing up answers and general advice. FreePBX was intended to get you over the dialplan creation hurdle (the biggest challenge for people new to Asterisk). In regards to the LinkSys they are compatible and you do find them in enterprises, but admins are trying to get rid of adapters/converters so if possible you may wish to invest in SIP devices directly instead of an adapter.