Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] global allocation IR instruction"
2014 Mar 29
2
[LLVMdev] Cast specific pointer type to generic one
Hi,
Suppose I have a pointer to "something" (a structure I defined) and I want
to pass the pointer to a generic function, that gets a 64-bit address
pointer.
How do I do that?
For instance:
The function is:
void Foo (void *);
I get the specific pointer using getPointerOperand() on a store instruction
that store to it:
inst->getPointerOperand()->getType()
Now I want
2015 May 25
2
[LLVMdev] global variable uses
Hi,
I'm trying to change all uses of a global variable so they'll use a
different global variable.
For instance, I have:
@a = global [100 x [100 x i64]] zeroinitializer, align 16
@b = global [100 x [100 x i64]] zeroinitializer, align 16
And I want to change the use
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i64]]* @a, i32 0, i64 %3
to
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds
2013 Dec 26
2
[LLVMdev] Arguments to IRBuilder CreateCall function
Hi,
I need to pass some arguments to CreateCall function (as Value *).
For example, I need to pass a 64 bit integer (with a value I calculate).
How can I convert the 64 bit integer to a value * in order to pass it?
Thanks a lot,
Tehila.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2014 Dec 31
5
[LLVMdev] outlining in llvm
Hi,
I have some questions regarding outlining (extracting piece of code into a
function):
1. Is there an outlining pass in llvm (IR)? I've found out
CodeExtractor pass, but I'm not sure it's exactly the same idea.
2. How do I set the function name?
And another question:
Where do I control the execution of my pass? I'm writing a pass that first
works on
2015 Dec 29
2
Running DCE after my pass
Hi,
I wrote an IR pass and it adds some instructions that are not used.
For example:
%1 = call i64 @foo()
When %1 is not used at all.
I thought that running DCE (-dce) or DIE (-die) after my pass will remove
such instructions, but it didn't.
Why? And is there a way to do that?
Thanks,
Tehila.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
2005 Jan 31
1
[LLVMdev] Question about Global Variable
Hi,
Sorry for bothering you guys again.
I got problem when I am trying to recover the Global Variable Initial value. What I did is like the following
ConstantArray *Cstr = dyn_cast<ConstantArray>(gI->getInitializer());
// the above instruction enable me to get the content of initial string of global variable, like char a[10] ="test global";
And then I make some change for
2010 Apr 11
1
[LLVMdev] llvm.global_ctors and other "appending linkage" global variables?
Can anyone explain how llc translates "appending linkage" global
variables like llvm.global_ctors into assembly? In the case I am
examining, the global_ctor variables are in multiple bitcode object
modules produced by the llvm compiler as arrays of pointers. As
documented, the arrays seem to be combined when the different bitcode
object modules are linked into one, so now there is one
2013 Jul 25
2
[LLVMdev] Error for AllocaInst and Instruction
Hi,
For the following code
const Type * Int32Type =
IntegerType::getInt32Ty(getGlobalContext());
AllocaInst* newInst = new AllocaInst(Int32Type, 0, "flag", Bb);
Bb->getInstList().push_back(newInst);
It gives me the error
" error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'llvm::AllocaInst'
AllocaInst* newInst = new
2014 Jul 03
5
[LLVMdev] Global constructors "get lost" when transforming bitcode files
Hello,
A strange problem appears when upgrading from release_34 to testing. Some
transformations to bitcode files cause registered global_ctors to not be
called. Here's an example (I've also attached the complete example and
pasted it below):
This works:
clang -fsanitize=address -flto -c -o sum.o sum.c
clang -fsanitize=address -o sum sum.o
This doesn't work:
clang
2013 Jul 31
1
[LLVMdev] Instruction insertion By Module Pass
Thank you for your help
I tried
Instruction* p=&( Bb->front());
Type * Int32Type = IntegerType::getInt32Ty(getGlobalContext());
AllocaInst* newInst = new AllocaInst(Int32Type,"flag", p);
that works well
but I need to store the value of the variable too.
What's the method that could be used to store specific value??
On 30 July 2013 16:01, John Criswell
2013 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] Instruction insertion By Module Pass
On 7/30/13 7:44 AM, Rasha Omar wrote:
> Hi,
> I need to insert new instruction into every basic block like x=1
> or while loop
> I tried this code, but it doesn't work
>
> Type * Int32Type = IntegerType::getInt32Ty(getGlobalContext());
> AllocaInst* newInst = new AllocaInst(Int32Type,"flag", Bb);
> Bb->getInstList().push_back(newInst);
The problem is
2007 Mar 06
0
[LLVMdev] alloca & store generation
> Why isn't llvm giving a name to the value returned by the allocas and
> using it in the store instructions?
Because you pass in an empty string for the name in the new AllocaInst
calls below. Replace the empty strings with "argc_addr" or whatever
you want.
> AllocaInst* argc_alloca = new AllocaInst(argc->getType(), "",
>
2014 Jul 31
2
[LLVMdev] Inconsistent third field in global_ctors (was Re: [llvm] r214321 - UseListOrder: Visit global values)
> On 2014-Jul-30, at 18:05, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2014-Jul-30, at 17:19, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Looking a little deeper, it's not "old-style" exactly; rejecting this
2014 Jul 07
4
[LLVMdev] Splitting basic block results in unknown instruction type assertion
Hello,
I would like to see if this issue is a result of a misunderstanding on
my part before I file a bug. I am using LLVM 3.4, built from the
source tarballs. My system's uname is "Darwin tyler-air 12.5.0 Darwin
Kernel Version 12.5.0: Sun Sep 29 13:33:47 PDT 2013;
root:xnu-2050.48.12~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64".
All I'm trying to do is add a runtime check after all call
2015 Jan 15
2
[LLVMdev] AllocaInst for FunctionType?
Hi,
I'm trying to get my head around c++ - IR - c++ API and getting used
tramform manual information to code.
The manual states alloca is defined for <type>. FunstionType is a type, so
alloca for functionType should be possible? Not?
If we have a valid Module *m
we can get an allocate instruction allocating space for a non-argumented
function as follows:
AllocaInst* pa2 = new
2019 Jul 28
2
Efficient way to identify an instruction
Hi Tim,
as always thanks for your help. Unfortunately I made a mistake in my email
but apart from that I still have problems.
Il giorno sab 27 lug 2019 alle ore 11:53 Tim Northover <
t.p.northover at gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Hi Alberto,
>
> On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 at 10:09, Alberto Barbaro via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > Having the reference I to
2013 Dec 12
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM Type Int32Ty Problems & LLVMContextImpl.h Problems
Hello! I'm newer to LLVM development . I'm trying to use AllocaInst class
to construct an instruction , I wrote like this:
AllocaInst *alloc = new AllocaInst(llvm::Int32Ty, 0, "indexLoc",i);
but it return the error:
error: use of undeclared identifier 'llvm::Int32Ty'
AllocaInst *alloc = new AllocaInst(Int32Ty, 0,
"indexLoc",i);
I
2010 Apr 18
0
[LLVMdev] create two Twine object
According to documentation Twines should be used only for temporary
values and not stored, so allocating the in heap sounds wrong.
I think all you need here is
static int varNum;
++varNum;
Instruction *sstatusInst = new AllocaInst(StatusTy, Twine("status") +
Twine(varNum), entry_inst);
Instruction *sreqInst = new AllocaInst(ReqTy, Twine("request") +
Twine(varNum),
2010 May 28
2
[LLVMdev] Retrieving Underlying Type from AllocaInst
Thanks Nick,
Unfortunately, that is indeed what I asked for but not what I really am looking for.
My naive approach is to store symbol table entries as Value* objects so I can allocate global variables and alloca variables and place them into the symbol table and the rest of the code didn't need to know which kind they were, in general. Loads and Stores of these types (as well as other
2010 May 28
0
[LLVMdev] Retrieving Underlying Type from AllocaInst
You should be able to use the second alternative that Nick proposed:
cast<PointerType*>(pointer_value->getType())->getElementType()
Reid
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Curtis Faith <curtis at curtisfaith.com> wrote:
> Thanks Nick,
> Unfortunately, that is indeed what I asked for but not what I really am
> looking for.
> My naive approach is to store symbol table