similar to: [LLVMdev] Different signatures or smart casting?

Hello, I am trying to set up samba on this host and testing it locally is giving me headaches right away. tom at hversa:~:~$ smbclient -L localhost -U% Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.4.8] Sharename Type Comment --------- ---- ------- homes Disk Home Directories print$ Disk Printer Drivers

Hallo zusammen, ?ber den Policy Service von Dovecot zum Abfragen der User Quotas wurde ja schon diskutiert - auch gibt es eine gute Anleitung zum Einrichten, nur leider bekomme ich den Policy Server nicht korrekt konfiguriert. Folgende Fehler werden protokolliert: May 3 22:00:13 mail postfix/smtpd[17463]: warning: access table unix:private/quota-status entry has empty value May 3 22:00:42

+ Evgeny We have a jump threading pass downstream for this that we would love to upstream. I believe Evgeny was working on exactly this, i.e. preparing it for upstreaming. ________________________________ From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Eli Friedman via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Sent: 23 September 2020 19:16 To: Phipps, Alan <a-phipps

It is my understanding that the implementation for jump-threading in LLVM is not presently able to effectively optimize code containing a state-machine implemented using a loop + switch. This is the case, for example, with the Coremark benchmark function core_state_transition(). Bug 42313 was filed to address this in 2019: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42313 It appears that GCC

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Jake VanAdrighem <jvanadrighem at gmail.com> wrote: > Do you have some specific performance measurements? Averaging 4 runs of 10000 iterations each of Coremark on my X86_64 desktop showed: -O2 performance: +2.9% faster with the L.E.V. pass -Os size: 1.5% smaller with the L.E.V. pass In the case of Coremark, the benefit comes mainly from the matrix

Hi Sjoerd We (at Huawei) also have a pass for this. Originally we implemented this back in 2018 and meant to upstream it, but there were some issues with the implementation that required some changes in the code. We started revising it,a few weeks ago. I thought now that there are multiple options, maybe we can discuss our approaches, and see if there is a preference in the community for one

Hello LLVM, This is a proposal for a new pass that improves performance and code size in some nested loop situations. The pass is target independent. >From the description in the file header: This optimization finds loop exit values reevaluated after the loop execution and replaces them by the corresponding exit values if they are available. Such sequences can arise after the

Hi Lang, Thanks for the reply. Responses below. As far as I know nobody is actively working on MCJIT any more. I've been > working on the next generation of LLVM JIT APIs (ORC - see > include/llvm/ExecutionEngine/Orc) for a while now, but they don't have > functionality for running arbitrary functions yet. > Thanks for the pointer to ORC -- it looks like the runFunction

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:36 AM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > Coremark really isn't a good enough test - have you run the LLVM test suite > with this patch, and what were the performance differences? For the test suite single source benches, the 235 tests improved performance, 2 regressed and 705 were unchanged. That seems very optimistic.

In ARM.td, I see that the ProcessorModel for cortex-r4, cortex-r4f, and cortex-r5 (as well as r7 and r8) is based on "CortexA8Model", which seems incorrect. When this was added in 2015, there were also comments associated with this configuration, such as "// FIXME: R5 has currently the same ProcessorModel as A8" (later removed). The processor model for Cortex-r52 appears to

Hello, Anytime when I issue rpm command, there will be a warning massage "warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature". For example, [root at hadoop-datanode44 ~]# rpm -qa | grep -i post postgresql-server-8.3.8-1PGDG.rhel4 warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature postgresql-8.3.8-1PGDG.rhel4 postgresql-pgpool-II-2.3.1-1

I was poking through the black magic in Casting.h, and I see this interesting struct/function: template<class To, class FromTy> struct cast_convert_val<To,FromTy,FromTy> { // This _is_ a simple type, just cast it. static typename cast_retty<To, FromTy>::ret_type doit(const FromTy &Val) { typename cast_retty<To, FromTy>::ret_type Res2 = (typename

On Wed, 13 Feb 2013, Karel Zak wrote: > Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:01:54 +0100 > From: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com> > To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> > Cc: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com, sandeen@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_mkfs: wipe old signatures from the device > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 07:27:53AM +1100, Dave

Hello, I've been using samba to share files on a Redhat server within a windows NT domain. Recently, security policies in the domain have changed, and security signatures are required for the LanManServer and Rdr services. Now that this has been deployed, I get an error when I try to connect to the SMB shares on the Redhat server from Windows hosts saying "account is not authorized to log

On 17 September 2013 19:04, Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com>wrote: > We have done some experimental evaluation of the different schedulers in > LLVM 3.3 (source, BURR, ILP, fast, MI). The evaluation was done on x86-64 > using SPEC CPU2006. We have measured both the amount of spill code as well > as the execution time as detailed below. > Hi Ghassan, This is an

Paul Johnson wrote: > On Thursday 13 March 2008 01:27:23 pm Paul Johnson wrote: > > > -------------- next part -------------- > > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > > Name: not available > > Type: application/pgp-signature > > Size: 189 bytes > > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. > > Url : > >

Since winetricks is a script with no maintainer-supplied digital signatures I thought it would be better than having nothing at all to have at least my perceived and purported digital signatures for it so I'm posting them here. $ grep WINETRICKS_VERSION winetricks |head -1 WINETRICKS_VERSION=20110429 4b2c72bd908a25efb8a74a370d72e79f winetricks md5 49264e6cdf820f5b21839f2c43cf9e3c91cd2409

Please enable signatures in messages.

Hello Is it possible to verify signatures of exe files? like sigcheck or sigverif does? there are *.cat files in windows\system32\catroot\ - can I open these files in Linux and dump containing information (filename:sha1 hash)? does mscat.h define some functions to do it? thanks

Hi all, I repost the message about the signatur because I've not had any response. This time I hopefuly to get some ideas. When we put the parameter "server signing = auto or Yes" in smb.conf, the Windows XP clients can no longer connect to the samba (3.0.2), the "net use \\server\ipc$ /u:user password" return error 64. If I disabled the "server signing" the