similar to: [LLVMdev] LLD: Removing Native file format?

I sent a patch for review. I'll wait for a while, probably submit that tomorrow. On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > I think I bought up this topic before, but I'd like to propose seriously > > removing the Native file format from LLD this

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: > >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com <mailto:ruiu at google.com>> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Mehdi

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 10:06 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: > >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com <mailto:ruiu at google.com>> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Mehdi

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: > >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 10:06 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com <mailto:ruiu at google.com>> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Mehdi

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Sean Silva via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > *To: *"Rui Ueyama" <ruiu at google.com> > *Cc: *"llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > *Sent: *Tuesday, December 13, 2016 9:59:37 PM >

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> >> wrote: >>

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sean Silva via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Rui Ueyama" <ruiu at google.com> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 9:59:37 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] LLD status update and performance chart > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Rui

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I believe the relocation stuff that Rafael is currently working on will >>> make

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2016, at 10:06 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > wrote: > >> >> > On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:55 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> >>> wrote:

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > There are two questions. > > > > Firstly, do you think the on-disk format needs to compatible with a C++ > > struct so that we can cast that memory buffer to the struct? That may be > >

Thanks for the info Rui. Transitioning from llvm 5.0 to llvm 7.0 will take some time due to the nature/process of the production environment. Is it ok to use lld 7.0 with llvm 5.0? On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 1:47 PM Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > Looks like Ubuntu 12 was released in 2012, and the most recent version of > LLVM is LLVM 8.0.0. > > LLVM 5.0 is pretty old,

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 10:06 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: > > > On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:55 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > >

Not all input files have to be able to represented in YAML/Native format. There are many unrealistic use cases there. No one wants to write an executable file in Native because there's no operating system that can run that file. So is YAML. So is the combination of .so file and Native/YAML unless we have an operating system whose loader is able to loads a YAML .so file. We might want to write

I think no one is opposing the idea of reading and writing YAML. The problem here is that why we need to force all developers to write code to serialize intermediate data in the middle of link, which no one except the round-trip passes needs. On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Shankar Easwaram <shankarke at gmail.com> wrote: > Doing it for every input file is not useful as some of the

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > On Oct 6, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > Looks like most people in this thread support using LLVM style in LLD. I > also had an offline discussion and many people wanted to have one coding > style in all LLVM projects. So I'm convinced that we should do that.

I've been working on the new LLD COFF linker for 1.5 months so far (including history of my personal repository), and I feel like I should post an update on that matter as a followup to the previous discussion thread. In short, it's doing very well. Completeness It was able to link itself from the first day when the first patch was landed. Since then, I fixed bugs and added more