Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] How to Cross Compile libcompiler_rt Static Library?"
2015 Mar 29
2
[LLVMdev] How to Cross Compile libcompiler_rt Static Library?
2015-03-29 3:33 GMT-05:00 Ed Schouten <ed at 80386.nl>:
> I am cross-compiling compiler-rt for my specific use-case. That said,
> I'm cross-compiling from x86-64 to x86-64, but for a different ABI.
> This is what I use:
>
>
> https://github.com/NuxiNL/cloudlibc/wiki/Building-runtime-libraries#user-content-compiler-rt
>
> -DCMAKE_CROSSCOMPILING=True
>
> As
2015 Mar 29
2
[LLVMdev] How to Cross Compile libcompiler_rt Static Library?
I need to correct myself. It is possible to cross compile it on Windows,
but not using the provided build systems.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote:
> I asked about this same question in the past (month or three ago). It is
> not possible to cross compile compiler-rt on Windows. If you want to cross
> compile you should use the make
2016 Dec 16
2
libcompiler_rt.so and libcompiler_rt.a are not being built
I want to build LLVM-based toolchain with Musl, I have LLVM sources with clang and lld (under `tools` directory) and libunwind, compiler-rt, libcxx and libcxxabi (under `projects` directory). All are the latest versions cloned from GitHub mirror, branch `master`.
I'm trying to configure with the following options:
CLANG_DEFAULT_CXX_STDLIB = libc++
CLANG_DEFAULT_RTLIB = compiler-rt
2016 Dec 16
0
libcompiler_rt.so and libcompiler_rt.a are not being built
> On Dec 16, 2016, at 7:06 AM, Dmitry Golovin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> I want to build LLVM-based toolchain with Musl, I have LLVM sources with clang and lld (under `tools` directory) and libunwind, compiler-rt, libcxx and libcxxabi (under `projects` directory). All are the latest versions cloned from GitHub mirror, branch `master`.
>
> I'm
2016 Dec 18
3
libcompiler_rt.so and libcompiler_rt.a are not being built
16.12.2016, 18:23, "Vedant Kumar" <vsk at apple.com>:
>> On Dec 16, 2016, at 7:06 AM, Dmitry Golovin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> I want to build LLVM-based toolchain with Musl, I have LLVM sources with clang and lld (under `tools` directory) and libunwind, compiler-rt, libcxx and libcxxabi (under `projects` directory). All are
2016 Dec 19
0
libcompiler_rt.so and libcompiler_rt.a are not being built
> On Dec 18, 2016, at 3:48 AM, Dmitry Golovin <dima at golovin.in> wrote:
>
>
>
> 16.12.2016, 18:23, "Vedant Kumar" <vsk at apple.com>:
>>> On Dec 16, 2016, at 7:06 AM, Dmitry Golovin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> I want to build LLVM-based toolchain with Musl, I have LLVM sources with clang and
2013 Jul 15
0
[LLVMdev] libcompiler_rt.a, No such file or directory
Trying to compile llvm-3.3 and I get this:
llvm[4]: Copying runtime library linux/asan-i386 to build dir
cp: cannot stat «/pkg/llvm-3.3.src/tools/clang/runtime/compiler-rt/clang_linux/full-i386/libcompiler_rt.a»: Ingen slik fil eller filkatalog
llvm[4]: Copying runtime library linux/ubsan-i386 to build dir
llvm[4]: Copying runtime library linux/ubsan_cxx-i386 to build dir
make[4]: ***
2015 Mar 29
2
[LLVMdev] How to Cross Compile libcompiler_rt Static Library?
I was attempting to cross compile on Windows. I ended up having to find
the list in the CMake build system (not very hard) and manually creating a
makefile to compile them. Took maybe 2 hours total.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Chao Yan <yanchao2012 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2015-03-29 15:11 GMT-05:00 Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com>:
>
>> I need to correct
2020 Mar 24
3
Bountysource campaign for the M68000 backend
Hello!
Almost two years ago, Artyom Goncharov submitted an initial effort for a
backend for the Motorola 68000 architecture [1] which was eventually
not merged, unfortunately. I elaborated why I supported the idea of
such a backend [2].
Recently, we started a fundraising campaign on the platform Bountysource.com
to port the M68K backend in GCC to the new MODE_CC register representation
which was
2018 Jul 12
3
[PATCH 0/7] PowerPC64 performance improvements
Hi Brian,
> Thank you for this collection of patches.
>
> How can I test them? What platforms (computers) have the ppc64 or
> POWER9 processor?
The IBM Bounty Source page has a list of resources:
https://www.bountysource.com/teams/ibm/bounties
Travis also has ppc64le support, so if you add the linux-ppc64le target
then FLAC will be tested on ppc64le.
Thanks,
Anton
2016 May 05
2
LLVM cross compilation for arm target
Hello All,
I am building llvm-clang tool chain for *arm target* by following the steps
from
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/CrossCompilation.html
*However when I tried following cmake command for build tool chain it gives
the error message :*
#CC='clang' CXX='clang++' cmake -G Ninja /home/iiita/llvm-exp/llvm
-DCMAKE_CROSSCOMPILING=True
2020 Jun 09
2
Cross compile x64 to AArch64 issues
Hi,
I am trying to cross compile release-10.x to AArch64
(target=aarch64-linux-gnu), and the directions listed at [1] are not
completing the initial cmake step. I'm currently running Manjaro,
with the aarch64-linux-gnu package (and associated binutils, headers,
and glibc packages). My cmake command is
cmake -DCMAKE_CROSSCOMPILING=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=`realpath
install`
2013 Jun 05
0
Issues that could benefit from a bounty reward?
Hey all,
I’m the founder of Bountysource.com. We ran a newsletter contest a few
weeks ago where we asked our users to pick their 3 favorite Open Source
projects. The winning projects would get bounties placed on a few top
issues, and Ruby on Rails came in first place, earning a $300 bounty reward!
So, my question to you guys... Where should the money go? If you reply with
an issue you really
2016 May 06
3
build issue in llvm-clang cross tool chain for arm target
Hello All,
I am building llvm-clang cross tool chain for arm target, after successful
build for Linux host now I am now building toolchain for *arm target*.
However, I am getting below error message which seems to be confusing and
not getting any idea how to resolve this issue.
*Command :*
#CC='clang' CXX='clang++' cmake -G Ninja /home/iiita/crossbuild/llvm
2016 Apr 25
2
bug: cross-compile Clang/LLVM for ARM using Clang/LLVM
Hi James, renato,
So how do I download the missing ARM libraries on Ubuntu14.04? I cannot
find any available libraries.
Best,
Liyang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160425/04dfc553/attachment.html>
2016 Apr 25
2
bug: cross-compile Clang/LLVM for ARM using Clang/LLVM
Hi renato,
1. The command above is followed by the guide[ HowToCrossCompileLLVM.rst ]
and I specify some path(ex. <path-to-host-bin>).
2. The including x86_64 libraries is added because of some missing
libraries(ex. "error: Host compiler appears to require libatomic, but
cannot find it"). As I have found that the bugs needed to dealt with is
some ARM-dependent libraries, I
2014 Apr 22
2
[LLVMdev] SCEV and induction variable identification
Hi Fellows,
The goal is to find the induction variable for a loop, where the
induction variable increments with the multiplication, division or shift
operations, like this one:
sz = 8;
do {
... ...
sz = sz / 2;
} while (sz)
Is SCEV capable of detecting the induction variable 'sz' in this case?
The code snippet I am using to solve the problem is
for each basic-block in a
2019 Jun 08
2
Help Building LLVM for Android
Hey Guys,
I'm working on a project in Android related to System-level Audio DSP
Effects for Tuning Android Audio. I want to leverage Faust (
https://faust.grame.fr/) to allow users to program their own filters.
Faust provides a libfaust implementation which includes a JIT Compiler
which leverages LLVM and seems to be the best path for me to use.
Unfortunately I'm having problems
2017 Oct 31
3
Cross compiling for Baremetal ARM without using GCC
Dear LLVM developers,
Hello,
I'm trying to find a way of cross-compiling my c code against Baremetal Cortex-M device (so target triple will be arm-none-eabi) only using LLVM/Clang, and not using anything from GNU (ld or libc).
I'm doing this to know which one of LLVM/clang and GCC produces smaller flash image size because saving flash is a big deal in our projects.
1) When I just follow
2013 Oct 31
3
[releng_10 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98
TB --- 2013-10-31 19:50:43 - tinderbox 2.20 running on worker01.tb.des.no
TB --- 2013-10-31 19:50:43 - FreeBSD worker01.tb.des.no 9.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p4 #0: Mon Jun 17 11:42:37 UTC 2013 root at amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-10-31 19:50:43 - starting RELENG_10 tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2013-10-31 19:50:43 - cleaning the