similar to: [LLVMdev] LNT Error 500

Dear all, I recently started to see internal server errors when submitting perf results to lnt.llvm.org http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer/builds/1154/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/stdio nt /home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer/tests/nt/build/sample-0/report.simple.csv

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 21:55, Tobias Grosser via llvm-dev wrote: > This started since about 1-2 weeks, I guess. I am not sure about it > either, but seems unfortunate. Maybe we run into some kind of timeout? And another one :( http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly/builds/1986/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/stdio 2017-08-03 00:24:44 CRITICAL: Results were not

The run page problem were triggered by one of my commits (sorry) and should be mitigated now, see the thread at http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115971.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115971.html> I don't know about the submission problems, could they just an occasional network problem or are they a common phenomenon? Chris did some

Hi, The new LNT server instance http://lnt.llvm.org seems to fail in many cases. Any entrance to a 'Run page' (e.g. http://lnt.llvm.org/db_default/v4/nts/62475) and lately also many perf bots result submissions (e.g. http://lab.llvm.org:8014/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt-perf/builds/2262/steps/test-suite/logs/stdio ) fails with: "500 Internal Server Error". Any ideas? Thanks,

Actually I just remember LNT has a page for viewing the log: http://lnt.llvm.org/log ... OperationalError: (OperationalError) (2006, 'MySQL server has gone away') 'SELECT `NT_Run`.`ID` AS `NT_Run_ID`, `NT_Run`.`MachineID` AS `NT_Run_MachineID`, `NT_Run`.`OrderID` AS `NT_Run_OrderID`, `NT_Run`.`ImportedFrom` AS `NT_Run_ImportedFrom`, `NT_Run`.`StartTime` AS `NT_Run_StartTime`,

Hi Tobi, http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly Looks like one of your boxes are bad and the other is good, but since they're both on the same bot, it looks to use as if it's unstable, spamming people every other build. :) Can you have a look, please? cheers, --renato

On 01/17/2014 12:59 AM, Chris Matthews wrote: > Do you guys have examples of a LNT results file that causes the failure? Hi Chris, thanks for the quick reply. Here a link to the most recent failing results file: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/polly-perf-O3/builds/704/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/report.json Please download it as the buildbots will delete it at some point. Tobias

I will take a peek at the server log. On Jan 16, 2014, at 4:09 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 01/17/2014 01:07 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 01/17/2014 12:59 AM, Chris Matthews wrote: >>> Do you guys have examples of a LNT results file that causes the failure? >> >> Hi Chris, >> >> thanks for the quick reply. Here a link

On 05/19/2015 08:50 PM, Chris Matthews wrote: > Just some stats, after looking through lab.llvm.org > <http://lab.llvm.org>:8011 > > Maybe these should be marked as experimental, and removed from the > builders link on the main page. > > Never passed at all: > libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx03 > libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-ubsan >

Hi Chris, llvm.org/perf gives again error 500s. I remember you had a look the last time. Would you mind looking again? Also, is there something which we could do to make LNT more robust. Do you have an idea what the last issue was about? Thanks, Tobias -------- Original Message -------- Subject: buildbot failure in LLVM on polly-perf-O3-polly-scev-codegen-isl Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:08:44

Re-poked. - Daniel On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 03/11/2014 12:41 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote: > >> Hi Chris, hi Daniel, >> >> I see again internal server errors when visiting llvm.org/perf. I >> remember you have been restarting the service several times, but it >> seems it is happening again. Did

On 01/16/2014 11:47 PM, Chris Matthews wrote: > The error you are seeing there is the client side error of a server side exception. It is probably best to address the actual failure. Those will probably be in the apache log on the server. > > That said, I think if a bot really is just for testing and not performance there is no harm in not submitting the results. I have the same

Hello everyone, Below are some buildbot numbers for the last week of 9/25/2016 - 10/1/2016. Please see the same data in attached csv files: The longest time each builder was red during the last week; "Status change ratio" by active builder (percent of builds that changed the builder status from greed to red or from red to green); Count of commits by project; Number of completed

Hello everyone, Below are some buildbot numbers for the last week of 6/05/2016 - 6/11/2016. Thanks Galina buildername | was_red -----------------------------------------------------------+----------- sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap | 134:12:25 perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-parallel-fast | 46:29:26

On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:17:32 +0200 Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 06/24/2012 05:42 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:25:13 +0200 > > Tobias Grosser<tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > > > >> On 06/21/2012 04:23 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > >>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 01:03:46 +0200 > >>> Tobias

Hello everyone, Below are some buildbot numbers for the week of 7/10/2016 - 7/16/2016. Please see the same data in attached csv files: The longest time each builder was red during the week; "Status change ratio" by active builder (percent of builds that changed the builder status from greed to red or from red to green); Count of commits by project; Number of completed builds, failed

On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 01:03:46 +0200 Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 06/20/2012 11:07 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:15:12 +0200 > > Tobias Grosser<tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > > > >> On 02/05/2012 02:42 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > >>> I think that it would be a good idea to have a buildbot set up to >

On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:15:12 +0200 Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 02/05/2012 02:42 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > I think that it would be a good idea to have a buildbot set up to > > run the test suite with -vectorize. Could one of the existing > > machines do this also? > > It took some time, but we have this now: > >

On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:25:13 +0200 Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 06/21/2012 04:23 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 01:03:46 +0200 > > Tobias Grosser<tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > > > >> On 06/20/2012 11:07 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > >>> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:15:12 +0200 > >>> Tobias

On 06/24/2012 02:42 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:17:32 +0200 > Tobias Grosser<tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > >> On 06/24/2012 05:42 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: >>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:25:13 +0200 >>> Tobias Grosser<tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >>> >>>> On 06/21/2012 04:23 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: >>>>>