similar to: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Raise minimum required CMake version to 2.8.12.2

> On Feb 24, 2015, at 11:13 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Feb 24, 2015, at 9:33 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Feb 24, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >>> >>> On 09.02.2015 20:12, Chris Bieneman wrote: >>>> It

My list of useful features in newer CMake versions, that I would like to see used: CMake 2.8.10 * INTERFACE_LIBRARY (we already use this by hacking around the CMake version) CMake 2.8.11 * Targets can now have dependencies that are arbitrary files instead of just link dependencies (http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Epics/CMake_target_usage_requirements

> On Feb 24, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > > On 09.02.2015 20:12, Chris Bieneman wrote: >> It came up on another thread that our current minimum required CMake version 2.8.8, has some bugs that cause issues when building with MSVC + Ninja, and one potential solution was to raise the minimum required version of CMake. >> >> CMake

I'm with Takumi, and prefer to go on a safe route. Takumi, unless I'm missing something you were checking cmake 3.x with LLVM. How does it look like? Did you discover any problem? Thanks Galina On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:28 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote: > I missed the context. We may stand on 2.8.12.2 at first. > > I will update my cmake from

Galina and Takumi, Are we ready to update the minimum required version to 2.8.12.2? -Chris > On Feb 12, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > > Chandler's feedback was that we should go to 2.8.12.2 instead of 3.0 because of Ubuntu's LTS release. > > -Chris > > > > On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova

I don't oppose the subject. I will update cmake within a few days. 2015-02-10 7:17 GMT+09:00 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>: > Now, with more Galina and Takumi on the To line. ;-) > > ~Aaron > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: >> +Galina, and Takumi >> >> This was a very short lived change :-).

I’m not too familiar with Ubuntu’s LTS releases, but from some google digging I believe there are 3 active LTS releases. 10.04 has CMake 2.8.0 (which is already below our minimum), but 10.04 will be dropping out of LTS this year. 12.04 has CMake 2.8.7 (also below our minimum) 14.04 has CMake 2.8.12.2, which should also have the fix for MSVC Based on this, it might be reasonable to update the

Apple doesn’t ship CMake publicly. Our internal build clusters should all be running 2.8.12.2 or later. Any OS X users not on CMake 2.8.12.2 can always download install packages from CMake.org <http://cmake.org/>. -Chris > On Feb 9, 2015, at 11:46 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at

+Galina, and Takumi This was a very short lived change :-). Looks like we have some bots that need to be updated. -Chris > On Feb 9, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com <mailto:beanz at apple.com>> wrote: > Apple doesn’t ship CMake publicly. Our internal

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "LLVM Dev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "jroelofs" <jonathan at codesourcery.com>, "Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es>, > "David Chisnall" <David.Chisnall at

> On Mar 10, 2015, at 2:53 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > > On 10 March 2015 at 21:30, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: >> In the absence of specific features which would make our use of CMake >> significantly better, I'm inclined to stick roughly to the version of CMake >> in the latest LTS release of ubuntu (I

Adding one more thing to this discussion. As far as I can tell, CMake 3.0 is the first version to support CMAKE_CXX_SIMULATE_ID. The clang-cl self-host build currently depends on this, as there's no other way to detect that we're building with clang-cl as opposed to MSVC without this. This feature still seems to be kind of undocumented though. I don't see it in any of the release

It came up on another thread that our current minimum required CMake version 2.8.8, has some bugs that cause issues when building with MSVC + Ninja, and one potential solution was to raise the minimum required version of CMake. CMake 3.0 is now 6 months old and CMake 3.1 has been released. I would like to propose moving our minimum required CMake version to 3.0. I’ve attached patches to enforce

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Greg Bedwell <gregbedwell at gmail.com> wrote: > We've just encountered an issue with ninja and VS2013 when using versions of > CMake prior to 2.8.12.1. This isn't a combination that we typically use so > we've not run into it previously in our own builds. It isn't specifically > tied to upgrading the minimum version as it's a

> We don't require users to compile their own gcc. Are you saying it's > impossible to get pre-built CMake 2.8.12 and gcc 4.7 on either Mac or > Windows? And we wouldn't be requiring it for cmake. My point was that cmake is always easier to install: * From binaries: a bit easier, since they are provided in http://www.cmake.org/ * From source: way easier than gcc. Gosh, from

On 3/10/15 3:53 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 10 March 2015 at 21:30, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: >> In the absence of specific features which would make our use of CMake >> significantly better, I'm inclined to stick roughly to the version of CMake >> in the latest LTS release of ubuntu (I don't know the stable releases of >> debian

> Pre-installed, or at all installable via packages. I don't think requiring a > new developer to build CMake before even checking out LLVM is wise. Why? We require recent compilers and installing a new cmake is easier (way easier if from source) than a new gcc. We already require it of every developer using windows or os X. By the same argument we should be providing xcode and msvc

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > (adding chandler to the To line) > > On Mar 10, 2015, at 12:29 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > > Chandler previously asked to ensure we stay with a cmake version that is > available in the Ubuntu packages. If you want to drop this requirement, you > probably want to

Yes. I’ll handle the documentation updates too. I’ll base the list of C++11 features on the MSDN documentation. -Chris > On Jan 30, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Chris Bieneman <cbieneman at apple.com> wrote: >> +Alex Bradbury >> >> Sounds to me like we have no known users still on

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Chris Bieneman <cbieneman at apple.com> wrote: > +Alex Bradbury > > Sounds to me like we have no known users still on VS 2012. > > So, how about we plan to move forward again with Chandler’s proposal for making this transition. For those who don’t want to dig through to the beginning here’s the basic plan: > > 1) Loop in cfe-dev and