similar to: [LLVMdev] GSOC:Control Flow integrity for kernal

Hi In my previous mail I mentioned the project on KCoFI( the control FLow integrity methods for commodity hardware http://sva.cs.illinois.edu/pubs/KCoFI-Oakland-2014.pdf ). Will it be more helpful to the community if I do the improvements number #1 and #3 mentioned in my previous mail to the mailing list or if i try to port it to arm architecture? I have decided to go ahead with the improvements

I triend the command make all-gold -k But the error message that it says now is: /usr/binutils/gold/system.h:38:11:fatal error: 'libintl.h' file not found #include <libintl.h> On Saturday, May 30, 2015, John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Aditya, > > Regarding the error, it looks like binutils is trying to build its > documentation. For

the symlink ld is already pointing to /usr/bin/ld. Also -fuse-ld=gold does not works on clang in freebsd. I am not sure where is the problem?should I remove /usr/bin/ld and create a new symlink to /usr/local/bin/ld.gold? Regards Aditya Verma Junior Undergraduate IDD Computer Sc & Engg IIT(BHU), Varanasi(UP) On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at

Dear Aditya, Regarding the error, it looks like binutils is trying to build its documentation. For your project, this is a step that you can skip. You can try using "make -k" to skip over errors and proceed to the "make install" step. That might work. As an aside, you should include the error as a plain text attachment instead of taking a graphic screenshot. The error

Hi I followed the steps on http://llvm.org/docs/GoldPlugin.html#lto-how-to-build to build the gold plugin on FreeBSD but ! Heres a link to the screenshot of the error: http://postimg.org/image/anlpuufbl/ This is the error message that it shows and so I am also unable to get ld-new. I checked and no CFLAGS were set in etc/make.conf. How to proceed with the installation? I am using the deault

I have been trying to enable the gold linker on FreeBSD to use the link time optimizations. I made gold from the binutils under /usr/ports. After building binutils using make -k install clean i got ld under /usr/bin and in the directory /usr/local/bin i got ld, ld.gold and ld.bfd. Now while trying to use link time optimization for the simple example programs

2015-09-01 11:38 GMT+08:00 John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com>: > On 8/31/15 10:43 PM, 慕冬亮 via llvm-dev wrote: > > I want to create an experiment to show the effectiveness of cfi : > For example , > I first need a program with vulnerability so that we can hijack its > control flow; > > then I enforce cfi of llvm and we can't hijack its control flow. > >

Hello, I am quite interested in the project "Instruction Scheduler" under X.org. Please tell me where can I find a detailed idea of the project and how to start it. I think I have the given prerequisites. Regards Shailesh Tripathi Shailesh Tripathi B.Tech. Part-IV Electronics Engineering IIT-BHU (Varanasi) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi all, If it's not the right place to ask, please forgive me. Currently I'm working on a new operating system concept, called "Om". The first feature would be Android-like apps, coming in *.opk files that would contain all needed resources and source-code expressed in LLVM-IR assembly language. http://sett.com/openminded-os/uid/88508 How does it sound ? Julien

Hi, I think a nice project would be to write an application to figure out those latencies automatically maybe even based on envydis. It could generate latency information based on thread count, register usage, instruction/instruction class, hw unit used. Or even tries to figure out what kind of units exist. Like instructions out of a group which are free to issue/execute after instructions out

Hello Sir, I am Reetesh Ranjan, a 3rd year undergraduate student at the *INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BHU, Varanasi-*one of the premier engineering colleges of India. I have gone through your webpage thoroughly and I am very interested in the work that you are undertaking on *Project: Weighting Schemes.*. I earnestly wish to work under your guidance, learn and progress through this experience.

I want to create an experiment to show the effectiveness of cfi : For example , I first need a program with vulnerability so that we can hijack its control flow; then I enforce cfi of llvm and we can't hijack its control flow. Do you have any advice for me? - mudongliang -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I wanted to know if there is any Python API exposed for libvirt using which I can attach a libvirt volume to a libvirt domain/VM. I intend to do something similar to the `attach-disk` command of virsh using python. -- *Regards,* *Varsha Verma* *Final Year Undergraduate* *Department of Electrical Engineering* *IIT-BHU, Varanasi*

Hello everyone, I am doing an outreachy internship at Openstack Ironic. In the sushy-tools project, we are using libvirt VMs to simulate bare metal machines for testing purposes. In the XML description of a domain, there are a bunch of disk elements giving information about the various storage devices attached to the domain. Is there some way to get the size/capacity of those disks using the

Dear Michael, If you're interested in SAFECode, the first step is to get SAFECode working with a newer version of LLVM. A Master's student did some work on this last summer with LLVM 3.7 but didn't finish. It would now need to be updated to LLVM 3.8 (though I suppose a completed LLVM 3.7 port would be fine with me). After that, there are some interesting projects on which to

John Criswell wrote: > If you're interested in SAFECode, the first step is to get SAFECode > working with a newer version of LLVM. A Master's student did some > work on this last summer with LLVM 3.7 but didn't finish. It would > now need to be updated to LLVM 3.8 (though I suppose a completed LLVM > 3.7 port would be fine with me). > > After that, there are

Hi, I ran into a problem when running DSA on Linux kernel (the Kernel version I used is 2.4.31). The analysis was aborted when it tried to do DSNode::mergeTypeInfo on some data structure in the kernel. I have filed a bug report at http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1656. My question is what version of Linux kernel LLVM has been tested on successfully? To run DSA analysis, should I use the

On 5/24/12 5:41 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Kostya, I'm also curious to know where Nuno is going with this, and the > details of his design. I'm worried he might be reinventing the wheel. I'm > also worried that he may be inventing a square wheel :) I believe Nuno's goal is to prevent run-time exploitation of software. Nuno, please correct me if I'm wrong. And

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:23 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > On 5/24/12 5:41 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > > Hi Kostya, I'm also curious to know where Nuno is going with this, and > the > > details of his design. I'm worried he might be reinventing the wheel. > I'm > > also worried that he may be inventing a square wheel :) > >

On 22 Jul 2016, at 07:14, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Just tried to set it up there: https://github.com/joker-eph/llvm-unified > (git log —follow is working fine with this setup). > > While it preserves the history fine (I.e. the hashes are identical to the current git), it has a drawback: there isn’t anymore a common ancestor for the