Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1100 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Add a backend"
2015 Mar 14
2
[LLVMdev] Add a backend
Yes, llvm::InitializeAllTargetMCs(void) does seem to be autogenerated. It
is _LLVMInitializeFooTargetMC that I can't find documented anywhere.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <
anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
> This function is autogenerated. You need also to change top-level
> configure / cmake files.
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Daniel
2015 Mar 14
2
[LLVMdev] Add a backend
Is there documentation somewhere about exactly what the function is
supposed to do, or do I have to figure it out from existing examples?
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <
anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
> You have to provide this function and initialize the whole MC
> infrastructure.
>
> See e.g. lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMMCTargetDesc.cpp
>
>
2015 May 06
4
[LLVMdev] LLD improvement plan
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> On May 5, 2015, at 6:47 PM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Take a look at how debuggers have migrated through the years. They too
>>
>> used to have their own script format. Now most (all?) popular debuggers
>> do scripting through embedding an actual programming
2014 Oct 31
3
[LLVMdev] Tree conflict on checkout
I am getting the following error while trying to checkout LLVM. I deleted
my local copy (no changes) just in case something was causing the issue,
but it didn't fix it.
Tree conflict on 'llvm\test\Bindings\Ocaml'
> local dir unversioned, incoming dir add upon update
Select: (r) mark resolved, (p) postpone, (q) quit resolution, (h) help:
-------------- next part --------------
2015 May 06
3
[LLVMdev] LLD improvement plan
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Will Newton <will.newton at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>> > On May 5, 2015, at 6:47 PM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>>
2015 Feb 20
3
[LLVMdev] Building Compiler-RT on Windows
[+Saleem]
On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:31:04 PM Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote:
> I am using CMake 3.1.2.
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> It looks like your command fails early in CMake TryCompile tests. Does
>> (your version of) CMake supports using Clang on Windows at all?
>>
2016 Apr 04
2
XOR CommandLine arguments
Both arguments require a string. Sorry, I forgot to mention that.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
> Could you do something like `-mode={if,od}` and make the option required?
>
> -- Sean Silva
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Daniel Dilts via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> With the
2015 Feb 26
1
[LLVMdev] Building Compiler-RT on Windows
I am attempting to build for bare-metal ARM.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org>
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> [+Saleem]
>>
>>
>> On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:31:04 PM Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
2015 Mar 29
2
[LLVMdev] How to Cross Compile libcompiler_rt Static Library?
I need to correct myself. It is possible to cross compile it on Windows,
but not using the provided build systems.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote:
> I asked about this same question in the past (month or three ago). It is
> not possible to cross compile compiler-rt on Windows. If you want to cross
> compile you should use the make
2015 May 06
2
[LLVMdev] LLD improvement plan
>
> > Linker scripts are worse than everything - except for the alternatives
> that
> > we know about. Any particular suggestions here?
>
> I very much care about the functionality provided by linker scripts (for
> embedded systems and kernel work), but I do agree that most current
> script formats are hard to use, debug, reason about, etc... I have
> often
2015 Feb 26
0
[LLVMdev] Building Compiler-RT on Windows
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com>
wrote:
> [+Saleem]
>
>
> On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:31:04 PM Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am using CMake 3.1.2.
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It looks like your
2014 Aug 22
10
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Raising LLVM minimum required MSVC version to 2013 for trunk
> On Aug 22, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com <mailto:beanz at apple.com>> wrote:
> Starting a new thread to loop in cfe-dev and lldb-dev. For those not following along there has been a thread on llvm-dev about moving the minimum required Visual Studio version to
2015 Feb 20
2
[LLVMdev] Building Compiler-RT on Windows
Has anyone built Compiler-RT on Windows? I am attempting to compile it for
ARM, but I get errors from CMake. It appears to be trying to pass VC++
flags to Clang. I am using a version of Clang built from trunk.
PS D:\llvm\arm_test\compiler-rt-build> cmake -G Ninja
-DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang.exe -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++.exe -DCM
AKE_RC_COMPILER=rc.exe -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=""
2010 Dec 25
4
[LLVMdev] Question of autotools about adding a new target for LLVM
Hello all,
I am a beginner of LLVM and want to add a new Target for LLVM. I follow the
document (http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html)
to modify autotools/configure.ac. However when I type ./AutoRegen.sh
There is an error that "Your autoconf was not detected as being 2.60"
I download the source of autoconf 2.60 and install it. And there is the
other error that
"Your
2015 Apr 28
2
[LLVMdev] Building compiler-rt for foreign target?
I'm developing something for an ARMv7-A system in big-endian mode. I'm
trying to use clang as the compiler for it. Things have been going
well so far, but I've hit a point where the generated code is
depending on functions which are implemented in compiler-rt. Since I'm
doing the building on an amd64 machine, the compiler-rt that I have
only targets x86/amd64. So, I have three
2012 Jul 06
4
[LLVMdev] New backend
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello devs,
I'd like to ask for some advise about adding a backend. I followed
the steps at http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html (also
adding the backend to the configure script, so it compiles (on Linux)
with LLVM 3.1.
However, llvm-build fails with:
llvm[0]: Constructing LLVMBuild project information.
Usage: llvm-build [options]
2015 Mar 29
2
[LLVMdev] How to Cross Compile libcompiler_rt Static Library?
2015-03-29 3:33 GMT-05:00 Ed Schouten <ed at 80386.nl>:
> I am cross-compiling compiler-rt for my specific use-case. That said,
> I'm cross-compiling from x86-64 to x86-64, but for a different ABI.
> This is what I use:
>
>
> https://github.com/NuxiNL/cloudlibc/wiki/Building-runtime-libraries#user-content-compiler-rt
>
> -DCMAKE_CROSSCOMPILING=True
>
> As
2011 Dec 12
2
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure
On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:51 PM, Tony Linthicum wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 4:49 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:41 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Tony Linthicum wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/12/2011 4:28 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
2017 Jan 03
2
LLVM WebAssembly target
Hello.
Excuse me.
Why CMakeLists.txt from llvm-3.9.1.src does not contain WebAssembly target?
So, it is like
set(LLVM_ALL_TARGETS
AArch64
AMDGPU
ARM
BPF
Hexagon
Mips
MSP430
NVPTX
PowerPC
Sparc
SystemZ
X86
XCore
)
but not like
set(LLVM_ALL_TARGETS
AArch64
AMDGPU
ARM
BPF
Hexagon
Mips
MSP430
NVPTX
PowerPC
Sparc
SystemZ
Webassembly
X86
2011 Dec 13
0
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure
I'm hitting this. Is there ETA for the fix?
Evan
On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:58 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
>
> On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:51 PM, Tony Linthicum wrote:
>
>> On 12/12/2011 4:49 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:41 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:36