similar to: [LLVMdev] Lifting ASM to IR

> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:44:02PM -0700, Daniel Dilts wrote: >> Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some >> supported target) to LLVM IR? If there isn't, does this seem like >> something that would be feasible? There's plenty of variations on the idea: Revgen/S2E, Fracture, Dagger (my own), libcpu, several closed-source ones used by

On 3/12/15 8:14 PM, Daniel Dilts wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Ahmed Bougacha > <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com <mailto:ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:44:02PM -0700, Daniel Dilts wrote: > >> Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some > >> supported target) to LLVM IR?

Hi - Not sure if anyone else saw this or cares about a decompiler (not personally tested) https://github.com/draperlaboratory/fracture I wonder if they have been in contact with anyone in the community in getting this upstreamed. Does it look interesting to anyone else? (thoughts/random comments/feedback)

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Jevin Sweval <jevinsweval at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:57 AM, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: >> Hi - >> >> Not sure if anyone else saw this or cares about a decompiler (not personally >> tested) >> https://github.com/draperlaboratory/fracture >> >> I wonder if

Hi, Is decompilation possible in general to the SSA form for binaries? I assume one has to make certain assumptions about code in general to get tools like these to work. For example if code like with dlsym or jit heap allocated functions can be incorporated at runtime it would seem that in general it is quite difficult to ascertain the boundaries of a basic block and insert the correct phi

I want to transform elf binary to llvm IR, and do some instrumentation based on llvm. Is there any tool which can do the transformation? Thanks in advance. - mudongliang -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150717/abee5f23/attachment.html>

Yes, llvm::InitializeAllTargetMCs(void) does seem to be autogenerated. It is _LLVMInitializeFooTargetMC that I can't find documented anywhere. On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Anton Korobeynikov < anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > This function is autogenerated. You need also to change top-level > configure / cmake files. > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Daniel

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On May 5, 2015, at 6:47 PM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > > Take a look at how debuggers have migrated through the years. They too >> >> used to have their own script format. Now most (all?) popular debuggers >> do scripting through embedding an actual programming

Is there documentation somewhere about exactly what the function is supposed to do, or do I have to figure it out from existing examples? On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Anton Korobeynikov < anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > You have to provide this function and initialize the whole MC > infrastructure. > > See e.g. lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMMCTargetDesc.cpp > >

I am getting the following error while trying to checkout LLVM. I deleted my local copy (no changes) just in case something was causing the issue, but it didn't fix it. Tree conflict on 'llvm\test\Bindings\Ocaml' > local dir unversioned, incoming dir add upon update Select: (r) mark resolved, (p) postpone, (q) quit resolution, (h) help: -------------- next part --------------

Both arguments require a string. Sorry, I forgot to mention that. On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > Could you do something like `-mode={if,od}` and make the option required? > > -- Sean Silva > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Daniel Dilts via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> With the

[+Saleem] On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:31:04 PM Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > I am using CMake 3.1.2. > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> It looks like your command fails early in CMake TryCompile tests. Does >> (your version of) CMake supports using Clang on Windows at all? >>

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Will Newton <will.newton at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> > On May 5, 2015, at 6:47 PM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: >> > >>

I am attempting to build for bare-metal ARM. On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com> > wrote: > >> [+Saleem] >> >> >> On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:31:04 PM Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> >> wrote:

I need to correct myself. It is possible to cross compile it on Windows, but not using the provided build systems. On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > I asked about this same question in the past (month or three ago). It is > not possible to cross compile compiler-rt on Windows. If you want to cross > compile you should use the make

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com> wrote: > [+Saleem] > > > On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:31:04 PM Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am using CMake 3.1.2. >> >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> It looks like your

In attempting to add a backend I came across the documentation here: http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html The section on the build system seems to be out of date, or maybe I don't understand it. I copied the Sparc target to a directory (Foo for the example), added Foo to the subdirectories list in llvm\lib\Target\LLVMBuild.txt and to LLVM_ALL_TARGETS in llvm\CMakeLists.txt. I

> > > Linker scripts are worse than everything - except for the alternatives > that > > we know about. Any particular suggestions here? > > I very much care about the functionality provided by linker scripts (for > embedded systems and kernel work), but I do agree that most current > script formats are hard to use, debug, reason about, etc... I have > often

> On Aug 22, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com <mailto:beanz at apple.com>> wrote: > Starting a new thread to loop in cfe-dev and lldb-dev. For those not following along there has been a thread on llvm-dev about moving the minimum required Visual Studio version to

Dear all, I would like to plot the dagger symbol in R (like LaTeX's \dagger). However, I was unable to do so. First, I thought maybe dagger actually exists just like the degree symbol: plot(0:1,0:1, type="n") text(x=0.5, y=0.5, labels=expression(degree)) plot(0:1,0:1, type="n") text(x=0.5, y=0.5, labels=expression(dagger)) However, this was not very successful. New