similar to: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Storing default function attributes on the module

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith < dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > > > On 2015-Feb-24, at 13:25, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Duncan, > > > > Been thinking about this a bit and a few comments/questions. I may have > misunderstood some things in your mail though so please feel free to >

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:18 PM Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith < > dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> > On 2015-Feb-24, at 13:25, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Duncan, >> > >> > Been thinking about this a bit and

> On Mar 5, 2015, at 1:01 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On 2015 Feb 26, at 11:34, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:18 PM Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith

As we encode more CodeGen and target-specific options in bitcode to support LTO, we risk crippling `llc` as a debugging tool. In particular, `llc` command-line options are generally ignored when a function has an attribute set explicitly, but the plan of record is for `clang` to explicitly encode all (or most) CodeGen options -- even the target defaults. Changing `clang` to store target defaults

Using R version 2.4.1 (2006-12-18) on Windows, I have a dataset which resembles this: id att1 att2 att3 1 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 3 0 1 1 4 1 1 1 ratings <- data.frame(id = c(1,2,3,4), att1 = c(1,1,0,1), att2 = c(1,0,0,1), att3 = c(0,1,1,1)) I would like to get a cross tab of counts of co-ocurrence, which might resemble this:

+grosbach > On 2015-Feb-12, at 14:45, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > > Are llc command line options all that critical? It's not that hard to edit the attributes directly or remove them with sed. Maybe Jim can speak to this one better than I can, but the workflow I've heard concerns about is: - Got a codegen bug (PR or whatever). - Want to fiddle with

Hi Duncan The first patch is general goodness and I think should be committed now. The other 2 LGTM. Unless anyone fundamentally objects to module attributes, or has feedback on the patches themselves, then please commit. I didn’t see any problems with them. Thanks, Pete > On Feb 12, 2015, at 4:02 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > > >> On Feb 12, 2015,

Hello all you helpful people out there! I am stil R Beginner using R 2.5.1 on a Apple Power Book G4 with Mac OS X 10.4.10 . Perhaps you haven?t understood my question in the mail yesterday. So I will try to describe my problem in a different way You see the tables. I would like to test the variables between the tables. But for some variables in some species , I have more than 1

I am trying to add a child to a child using XML package in R. the following fails library(XML) node1 <- c("val1","val2","val3") names(node1) <- c("att1","att2","att3") root <- xmlNode("root", attrs=node1) node2 <- LETTERS[1:3] names(node2) <- paste("name",1:3,sep="") root <-

Dear R community, I do know, that an R function is constructing a copy of any object passed as argument into a function. I program on a larger S4 project for a package, and I arrived at a point where I have to think a little harder on implementation style (especially to spare users complex object handling). I have a function foo(), taking as input arguments two S4 objects of different class

Big thanks. newXMLNode works great. Wonder why it is not included in the documentation. There is newXMLDoc and newXMLNamespace, but no mention of newXMLNode. Stephen From: Ben Tupper [mailto:btupper at bigelow.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 6:18 PM To: Bond, Stephen Cc: r-help Subject: Re: [R] how to add a child to a child in XML Hi, XML doesn't use the `$` to access child nodes.

Hi, XML doesn't use the `$` to access child nodes. Instead use either `[name]` to get a list of children of that name or `[[name]]` to get the just the first child of that name encountered in the genealogy. Thus for your example... > root$child1 NULL > root[['child1']] <child1 name1="A" name2="B" name3="C"/> On the other hand, you might

Hi, It's a reasonable question. The answer is that it actually is included, but there are many instances across packages where multiple functions are documented on a single help page. The following brings up such a page... (for XML_3.98-1.9) > library(XML) > ?newXMLNode You can see the same on line... https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/XML/versions/3.98-1.9/topics/newXMLDoc

Just to clarify and hopefully catch the attention of the maintainer: The newXMLNode function is not mentioned in: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/XML/XML.pdf which supposedly describes all functions in the package. Stephen From: Ben Tupper [mailto:btupper at bigelow.org] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 10:40 AM To: Bond, Stephen Cc: r-help Subject: Re: [R] how to add a child to a

Hi, It looks like SimplifyLibCalls has a tendency to emit calls to libm functions without checking with TLI whether these calls are available. For example, PowOpt has this code: struct PowOpt : public UnsafeFPLibCallOptimization { PowOpt(bool UnsafeFPShrink) : UnsafeFPLibCallOptimization(UnsafeFPShrink) {} virtual Value *callOptimizer(Function *Callee, CallInst *CI, IRBuilder<> &B)

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Kuperstein, Michael M < michael.m.kuperstein at intel.com> wrote: > Hi,**** > > ** ** > > It looks like SimplifyLibCalls has a tendency to emit calls to libm > functions without checking with TLI whether these calls are available.**** > > For example, PowOpt has this code:**** > > ** ** > > struct PowOpt : public

Hi Bill, there are a couple of things I didn't understand about your proposal, for example how it interacts with inlining, whether it is feasible to do the "turn invoke-of-Unwind_Resume into a branch" optimization and also whether in "resumedest" you still plan to use _Unwind_Resume to continue unwinding up the stack. Could you please show what the LLVM IR would look like

I have a model with a attribute named "code". Every time i create an instance I want the "code" to be initialized by making a call to "generate_code" method. How do i initialize model attributes in rails ?? thanks for help. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are

This is a revision of the second exception handling proposal I sent out. You can see it here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-November/036484.html After much discussion, there are some changes to the proposal – some significant and some minor. One major point, this proposal does not address the issue of catching an exception thrown from a non-invoke instruction. However if done

On 01/13/2010 02:07 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Dustin, the code generators do not support unwind, only the > interpreter does. Ah, the secret is not to even try to frob the gnorts. Manual unwinding, here I come. :-( I was going to say the interpreter doesn't either, but then I recalled it JITs when it can. I don't know how to call into libc from the interpreter to test that.