similar to: [LLVMdev] Accessing a custom defined llvm pass

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Accessing a custom defined llvm pass"

2009 Aug 21
2
[LLVMdev] How to force MemoryDependenceAnalysis to run on original module
Chris Lattner schrieb: > On Aug 21, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Marc Brünink wrote: >>> This isn't really possible. The issue is that MemDep doesn't just >>> "analyze your function". It is designed to be as lazy as possible, >>> which means that it only does analysis when a query is performed. This >>> means that if you have
2009 Aug 21
0
[LLVMdev] How to force MemoryDependenceAnalysis to run on original module
On Aug 21, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Marc Brünink wrote: >> This isn't really possible. The issue is that MemDep doesn't just >> "analyze your function". It is designed to be as lazy as possible, >> which means that it only does analysis when a query is performed. >> This >> means that if you have MemDep->Pass1->Pass2 and Pass2 uses MemDep
2009 Aug 21
2
[LLVMdev] How to force MemoryDependenceAnalysis to run on original module
Chris Lattner schrieb: > > On Aug 20, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Marc Brünink wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I do have a FunctionPass that does change the code. This FunctionPass >> requires another FunctionPass which performs all the necessary analyses. >> This AnalysisPass again requires MemoryDependenceAnalysis. >> >> The problem is, that I would like
2009 Aug 21
0
[LLVMdev] How to force MemoryDependenceAnalysis to run on original module
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Marc Brünink<marc at bruenink.de> wrote: >>> actually my problem is easier. So I still have hope that it is possible: >>> >>> MemDep->Pass1->Pass2 >>> >>> Pass1 uses MemDep. Pass2 only uses Pass1. Eventually, Pass2 changes the >>> code. Unfortunately, non-local dependencies of MemDep might point to
2009 Aug 20
0
[LLVMdev] How to force MemoryDependenceAnalysis to run on original module
On Aug 20, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Marc Brünink wrote: > Hi, > > I do have a FunctionPass that does change the code. This FunctionPass > requires another FunctionPass which performs all the necessary > analyses. > This AnalysisPass again requires MemoryDependenceAnalysis. > > The problem is, that I would like MemoryDependenceAnalysis to run on > the > unaltered
2024 Oct 07
1
rpcclient setdriver fails with WERR_ACCESS_DENIED
Dear Samba-experts, I'm trying to setup automatic printer download with our samba 4.19.4 fileserver which is a domain member of our samba 4.18.2 AD. printer drivers have been installed on the fileserver: root at serv00:# rpcclient -Uprtadmin%pass1 SERV00 -c enumdrivers [Windows x64] Printer Driver Info 1: Driver Name: [Kyocera TASKalfa 5052ci NAEV] CUPS-printers have been installed
2012 Jun 26
0
[LLVMdev] Does anaysis group only contain passes?
On 6/25/12 8:55 PM, Thomson wrote: > Thanks, John. > > This sounds reasonable that the analysis group just provides an > interface to its implementors (pass). Then I have another question, is > it allowed to specify multiple pass in the same analysis group in the > command line for opt? Yes, you can do that. Using multiple analysis passes that belong to the same group may
2007 Dec 17
3
[LLVMdev] Bug 1868: Specifying Pass Orderings
Dear Devang Patel, In response to your comment on bug 1868, how do I get BottomPass to requires Pass2 before Pass1? Is it by reversing the order of the calls to AU.addRequired()? -- John T. -- John T. Criswell jcriswel at bigw.org "It's today!" said Piglet. "My favorite day," said Pooh.
2024 Oct 08
1
rpcclient setdriver fails with WERR_ACCESS_DENIED
On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:46:36 +0200 Peter Koch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Dear Samba-experts, > > I'm trying to setup automatic printer download with our > samba 4.19.4 fileserver which is a domain member of > our samba 4.18.2 AD. > > printer drivers have been installed on the fileserver: > > root at serv00:# rpcclient -Uprtadmin%pass1
2010 Oct 17
2
Error with Connecting Two Asterisk BOX with IAX
Hello, I'm trying to conect two 1.6.2.13 Asterisk server with IAX. This is my configuration: Asterisk A: iax.conf register => coiax:pass1 at 69.164.207.166 [smiax] type=friend host=dynamic trunk=yes secret=pass2 context=phones deny=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 permit=69.164.207.166/255.255.255.255 qualify=yes Console: iax2 registry 69.164.207.166:4569 N coiax 69.164.197.105:4569
2003 Jun 26
2
Is there something sppecial about pass4 ?
Machine is 4.8-STABLE smaug# camcontrol devlist <COMPAQ BD009122BA 3B07> at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,da0) <COMPAQ BD009122C6 B016> at scbus0 target 1 lun 0 (pass1,da1) <COMPAQ BD009122BA 3B07> at scbus0 target 2 lun 0 (pass2,da2) <COMPAQ BD00962373 BCJE> at scbus0 target 3 lun 0 (pass3,da3) <IBM IC35L018UCPR15-0 S70H>
2009 Aug 26
1
2 Asterisk boxes : 1 can see the other, not vica versa
Asterisk-server 1 : register => hostedasterisk:pass1 at domain2.biz [BOX-YOCAN] type=user ; incoming from YOCAN... auth=rsa inkeys=Key ; pub key of user secret=XXX ; pass2 of YOCAN context=from-BOX-YOCAN ; incoming from YOCAN trunk=yes transfer=no qualify=yes [BOX-YOCAN] type=peer ; outgoing to YOCAN... host=dynamic ; registers auth=rsa outkey=kEy ; private secret key
2010 Feb 21
1
[LLVMdev] patch: purdy colours for makefiles
Here is a patch to add colour to build output (make) for LLVM sources. Feedback and ideas welcome. The patch replaces $(Echo) usage in some key rules in Makefile.rules with $(Banner) which invokes a new script utils/make-banner.sh which is capable of adding appropriate ANSI escape sequences. step1: apply patch step2: chmod 755 utils/make-banner.sh step3: export MAKE_BANNER_ANSI=1 Next, you must
2002 May 21
4
Samba+PDC+LDAP (add user script + unix passwd sync) Can't call perl script
Hi, i've compiled samba 2.2.4 on a Redhat 7.1 machine, working with openldap 2.0.23. I also downloaded smbldap-tools from IDEALX which i fixed myself to fit my needs. Everything work very fine when running the scripts in shell mode... but! In smb.conf : ============= add user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd.pl -w %u This line don't work and it should, because when running
2024 Oct 08
2
rpcclient setdriver fails with WERR_ACCESS_DENIED
Hi Rowland, Thanks very much for your quick response. > Have you tried the command with a member of Domain Admins instead of > Administrator ? I just did and I now feel that something is wrong with our Administrator-account. Granting the SePrintOperatorPrivilege to user NAV\prtadmin with user NAV\Administator failes on our fileserver (INVALID PASSWORD). Granting the
2010 Nov 18
2
Two Windows users with two passwords must map to the same unix user
Hello, I have no idea how to implement the following scenario apart from running two instances of samba on the same machine... I need a setup where two different Windows users will authen- ticate with two different passwords but get mapped to the same unix user. That is JOE got password PASS1 and maps to unix user joe with uid 1000 and JACK got password PASS2 and maps to unix user joe with
2009 Apr 21
11
can we decrypt the cipher encrypted using Digest::SHA1.hexdigest
what i have done is as follows password = Digest::SHA1.hexdigest("#{salt}:#{password}") pass1 = Digest::SHA1.hexdigest("#{salt}:asdfgh") pass2 = Digest::SHA1.hexdigest("#{salt}:asdfgh") pass3 = Digest::SHA1.hexdigest("#{salt}:qwerty") puts pass1==pass2 puts pass1==pass3 This works fine but i need to get the decrypted password how can i get it any help is
2018 Mar 16
0
Debugify and Verify-each mode
> On Mar 16, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Son Tuan VU <sontuan.vu119 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Vedant, > > Thank you for your reply. I think I can make this debugify-each mode, but I guess this is reserved for your GSoC project ? No, there's no reserved work. If you'd like to work on this I encourage you to do so. There's plenty of other work slated for the GSoC project.
2004 Nov 18
3
[LLVMdev] A few beginner level questions..
1. If we run a few passes in a sequence ..is the bytecode file transformed after each pass in sequence i.e if we have a) opt -pass1 -pass2 -pass3 < in.bc > out.bc b)opt -pass1 -pass2 < in.bc > tmp.bc opt -pass3 < tmp.bc > out.bc are the above two equivalent ? what I basically want is to run my pass on an optimised bytecode , so should i optimize it and get a new bytecode
2007 Dec 18
0
[LLVMdev] Another Pass Manager Assertion
On Dec 18, 2007, at 10:55 AM, John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > The attached code (which is a contrived test case) hits the following > assertion: > > test: > /home/vadve/criswell/src/llvm22/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h: > 226: > AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*, > llvm::Function&) [with AnalysisType = Pass1]: Assertion