similar to: [LLVMdev] [RFC] When can libc++ "officially" support linux?

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > 2. We need to clarify how libstdc++ and libsupc++ can be used as > > libc++'s ABI library and explicitly define the level of support for > > these configurations. Are there any people using this functionality? > > These configurations have been broken for GCC >= 4.9.2 and I haven't

On 5 Jun 2017, at 15:17, Jonathan Roelofs via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 6/5/17 5:17 AM, Dmitry Golovin via llvm-dev wrote: >> I'm trying to build LLVM, Clang, LLD, compiler-rt, libc++, libc++abi and libunwind with musl-based toolchain. >> >> The configuration is the following: >> >> LIBCXX_HAS_MUSL_LIBC=ON >>

Does the new libc++ library have to be built independent of llvm/clang? It would be nice if one could just drop its source tree into the llvm tree ala clang and do a single build for all three together. Jack ps Can libc++ be used in the llvm-gcc-4.2 build? Can one use the approach of... rm -fr ../llvm-gcc-4.2-4.2.source/libstdc++-v3 and passing configure --with-gxx-include to build

On 28 Jul 2016 8:36 a.m., "David Chisnall via llvm-dev" < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > This does not apply to libc++. We support building the entire LLVM suite with other C++ standard library implementations (at least libstdc++, and I think also with Visual Studio’s implementation), so there is no dependency of anything on libc++. Similarly, we support building libc++

Since the original buildit script doesn't cover my needs I switched to a custom but really similar script, in the meantime I also got the habit to dig for new flags and support and the __GLIBCXX__ define was hiding some of this errors. I see that other linux-based operating system offer this kind of support and they even use the same core components of my GNU/Linux distribution. You are

On 28 Jul 2016, at 08:59, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > > On 28 Jul 2016 8:36 a.m., "David Chisnall via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > This does not apply to libc++. We support building the entire LLVM suite with other C++ standard library implementations (at least libstdc++, and I think also with Visual Studio’s

Hi all, I'm trying to add builders to zorg for libc++ and libc++abi. I think I have the builder right, but I have a few questions. First, how do I know which build slaves to use? Is it okay to just pick a few, is there some policy defining which are fair game, or do I need to add a new one? Second, is there a simple way to test the builder and config before I commit it? Here's my first

I'm trying to build LLVM, Clang, LLD, compiler-rt, libc++, libc++abi and libunwind with musl-based toolchain. The configuration is the following: LIBCXX_HAS_MUSL_LIBC=ON LIBCXX_HAS_GCC_S_LIB=OFF CLANG_DEFAULT_CXX_STDLIB=libc++ CLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld CLANG_DEFAULT_RTLIB=compiler-rt LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE=x86_64-pc-linux-musl LLVM_TARGET_ARCH=x86_64

Hello, I wanted to try the new c++ stuff, ie clang-3.2, libc++ and libcxxrt, so I used poudriere to build a jail setup for that ( WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS=yes in src.conf, CXXFLAGS+=-stdlib=libc++ and libsupc++.so.1 libcxxrt.so.1 in libmap.conf ), and started to build my normal set of packages ( see desktop.list ). Please note that I also have WITH_NEW_XORG=yes and WITH_KMS=yes, as well as using the

On May 11, 2010, at 7:26 PM, David Greene wrote: > On Tuesday 11 May 2010 15:43:21 Chris Lattner wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> LLVM now includes a C++ standard library, written by Howard Hinnant. You >> can read about it here: >> http://blog.llvm.org/2010/05/new-libc-c-standard-library.html >> >> Or get the code here: >> svn co

On May 11, 2010, at 9:32 PM, David Leimbach wrote: > > libc++: > > 5 seconds > > libstdc++: > > 22 seconds > > (smaller is better) > > Is this libstdc++ with or without rvalue references? > > How about compile times? Having used Go a bit, I've been quite fond of how short the code, compile, test loop ends up being. Tonight compile times

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Andrew Sutton <andrew.n.sutton at gmail.com>wrote: > > What's driving libc++? >> >> The possibility of being a superior solution. >> > > I thought "to support Apple applications" from the previous post was > sufficient motivation :) Either way, I'm excited about a new library. Plus, > it looks a little

Hi, I'm under Ubuntu 13.10 amd64 I just compiled both my libcxx and my libcxxabi. I noticed this really weird behaviour, while trying to compile some C++11-compliant piece of code I get this error at runtime exception_ptr not yet implemented Aborted (core dumped) Now my experience tells me that this is something that can easily be related to the ABI, so I go to the official libcxxabi

Hi, I'm currently working on one of my team's project to build LLVM full clang toolchain (Clang, libcxx, libcxxabi) on a CentOS machine. Previously we compiled our codebase with llvm-toolset-7/clang++, which by default takes stdlibc++ to compile and link. And now we'd like to switch to use LLVM clang with libc++. I have built libc++ and libc++abi from source (5.0.1 release) and set

On Tuesday 11 May 2010 15:43:21 Chris Lattner wrote: > Hi All, > > LLVM now includes a C++ standard library, written by Howard Hinnant. You > can read about it here: > http://blog.llvm.org/2010/05/new-libc-c-standard-library.html > > Or get the code here: > svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk libcxx > > If you have questions or comments, please

On 04/12/2019 06:31 PM, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: > On 04/12/2019 04:28 PM, AiChi via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm currently working on one of my team's project to build LLVM full clang toolchain (Clang, libcxx, libcxxabi) on a CentOS machine. >> >> Previously we compiled our codebase with llvm-toolset-7/clang++, which by default takes stdlibc++

On May 11, 2010, at 8:40 PM, Andrew Sutton wrote: > > What's driving libc++? > > The possibility of being a superior solution. > > I thought "to support Apple applications" from the previous post was sufficient motivation :) Either way, I'm excited about a new library. Plus, it looks a little easier to read (from the tiny amount of code that I've looked

Hi community, In CentOS 7 there is such rpm (libcxx-devel - it seems from EPEL repository), but in CentOS 8 it isn't. How is it possible to have it there as RPM? because alternative to build it (libc++) from sources is a big headache (I need it in order to build v9 and plv8 projects) Thanks

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:21 AM, James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Ryan Prichard via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> 2. *Termination landing pads.* >> >> Clang sometimes uses a landing pad that calls __clang_call_terminate to >> terminate the program. GCC instead leaves a gap in

On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, Alexandru Lazarev wrote: > Hi community, > In CentOS 7 there is such rpm (libcxx-devel - it seems from EPEL > repository), but in CentOS 8 it isn't. > > How is it possible to have it there as RPM? because alternative to build it > (libc++) from sources is a big headache (I need it in order to build v9 and > plv8 projects) Do you mean the