Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] [RFC] When can libc++ "officially" support linux?"
2015 Feb 21
4
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [RFC] When can libc++ "officially" support linux?
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> > 2. We need to clarify how libstdc++ and libsupc++ can be used as
> > libc++'s ABI library and explicitly define the level of support for
> > these configurations. Are there any people using this functionality?
> > These configurations have been broken for GCC >= 4.9.2 and I haven't
2017 Jun 06
3
libc++ failed to link against musl
On 5 Jun 2017, at 15:17, Jonathan Roelofs via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/5/17 5:17 AM, Dmitry Golovin via llvm-dev wrote:
>> I'm trying to build LLVM, Clang, LLD, compiler-rt, libc++, libc++abi and libunwind with musl-based toolchain.
>>
>> The configuration is the following:
>>
>> LIBCXX_HAS_MUSL_LIBC=ON
>>
2010 Oct 06
1
[LLVMdev] libc++ builds
Does the new libc++ library have to be built independent of llvm/clang?
It would be nice if one could just drop its source tree into the llvm tree
ala clang and do a single build for all three together.
Jack
ps Can libc++ be used in the llvm-gcc-4.2 build? Can one use the approach
of...
rm -fr ../llvm-gcc-4.2-4.2.source/libstdc++-v3
and passing configure --with-gxx-include to build
2016 Jul 28
3
[RFC] One or many git repositories?
On 28 Jul 2016 8:36 a.m., "David Chisnall via llvm-dev" <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> This does not apply to libc++. We support building the entire LLVM suite
with other C++ standard library implementations (at least libstdc++, and I
think also with Visual Studio’s implementation), so there is no dependency
of anything on libc++. Similarly, we support building libc++
2014 May 01
2
[LLVMdev] [ exception_ptr ] libcxx doesn't cope well with libcxxabi under linux
Since the original buildit script doesn't cover my needs I switched to a custom but really similar script, in the meantime I also got the habit
to dig for new flags and support and the __GLIBCXX__ define was hiding
some of this errors. I see that other linux-based operating system offer this kind of support and they even use the same core components of my
GNU/Linux distribution.
You are
2016 Jul 28
0
[RFC] One or many git repositories?
On 28 Jul 2016, at 08:59, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 28 Jul 2016 8:36 a.m., "David Chisnall via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > This does not apply to libc++. We support building the entire LLVM suite with other C++ standard library implementations (at least libstdc++, and I think also with Visual Studio’s
2014 Aug 02
3
[LLVMdev] zorg config for libc++/libc++abi
Hi all,
I'm trying to add builders to zorg for libc++ and libc++abi. I think I have
the builder right, but I have a few questions.
First, how do I know which build slaves to use? Is it okay to just pick a
few, is there some policy defining which are fair game, or do I need to add
a new one?
Second, is there a simple way to test the builder and config before I
commit it?
Here's my first
2017 Jun 05
3
libc++ failed to link against musl
I'm trying to build LLVM, Clang, LLD, compiler-rt, libc++, libc++abi and libunwind with musl-based toolchain.
The configuration is the following:
LIBCXX_HAS_MUSL_LIBC=ON
LIBCXX_HAS_GCC_S_LIB=OFF
CLANG_DEFAULT_CXX_STDLIB=libc++
CLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld
CLANG_DEFAULT_RTLIB=compiler-rt
LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE=x86_64-pc-linux-musl
LLVM_TARGET_ARCH=x86_64
2013 Feb 03
1
Ports and WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS
Hello,
I wanted to try the new c++ stuff, ie clang-3.2, libc++ and libcxxrt, so I
used poudriere to build a jail setup for that ( WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS=yes in
src.conf, CXXFLAGS+=-stdlib=libc++ and libsupc++.so.1 libcxxrt.so.1 in
libmap.conf ), and started to build my normal set of packages ( see
desktop.list ). Please note that I also have WITH_NEW_XORG=yes and
WITH_KMS=yes, as well as using the
2010 May 12
2
[LLVMdev] New libc++ LLVM Subproject
On May 11, 2010, at 7:26 PM, David Greene wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 May 2010 15:43:21 Chris Lattner wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> LLVM now includes a C++ standard library, written by Howard Hinnant. You
>> can read about it here:
>> http://blog.llvm.org/2010/05/new-libc-c-standard-library.html
>>
>> Or get the code here:
>> svn co
2010 May 12
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] New libc++ LLVM Subproject
On May 11, 2010, at 9:32 PM, David Leimbach wrote:
>
> libc++:
>
> 5 seconds
>
> libstdc++:
>
> 22 seconds
>
> (smaller is better)
>
> Is this libstdc++ with or without rvalue references?
>
> How about compile times? Having used Go a bit, I've been quite fond of how short the code, compile, test loop ends up being.
Tonight compile times
2010 May 12
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] New libc++ LLVM Subproject
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Andrew Sutton <andrew.n.sutton at gmail.com>wrote:
> > What's driving libc++?
>>
>> The possibility of being a superior solution.
>>
>
> I thought "to support Apple applications" from the previous post was
> sufficient motivation :) Either way, I'm excited about a new library. Plus,
> it looks a little
2014 May 01
2
[LLVMdev] [ exception_ptr ] libcxx doesn't cope well with libcxxabi under linux
Hi,
I'm under Ubuntu 13.10 amd64 I just compiled both my libcxx and my libcxxabi.
I noticed this really weird behaviour, while trying to compile some C++11-compliant piece of code I get this error at runtime
exception_ptr not yet implemented
Aborted (core dumped)
Now my experience tells me that this is something that can easily be related to the ABI, so I go to the official libcxxabi
2019 Apr 12
2
Failed to replace stdlibc++ with libc++, linker phase error
Hi,
I'm currently working on one of my team's project to build LLVM full clang
toolchain (Clang, libcxx, libcxxabi) on a CentOS machine.
Previously we compiled our codebase with llvm-toolset-7/clang++, which by
default takes stdlibc++ to compile and link. And now we'd like to switch to
use LLVM clang with libc++. I have built libc++ and libc++abi from source
(5.0.1 release) and set
2010 May 11
0
[LLVMdev] New libc++ LLVM Subproject
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 15:43:21 Chris Lattner wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> LLVM now includes a C++ standard library, written by Howard Hinnant. You
> can read about it here:
> http://blog.llvm.org/2010/05/new-libc-c-standard-library.html
>
> Or get the code here:
> svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk libcxx
>
> If you have questions or comments, please
2019 Apr 13
2
Failed to replace stdlibc++ with libc++, linker phase error
On 04/12/2019 06:31 PM, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote:
> On 04/12/2019 04:28 PM, AiChi via llvm-dev wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm currently working on one of my team's project to build LLVM full clang toolchain (Clang, libcxx, libcxxabi) on a CentOS machine.
>>
>> Previously we compiled our codebase with llvm-toolset-7/clang++, which by default takes stdlibc++
2010 May 12
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] New libc++ LLVM Subproject
On May 11, 2010, at 8:40 PM, Andrew Sutton wrote:
> > What's driving libc++?
>
> The possibility of being a superior solution.
>
> I thought "to support Apple applications" from the previous post was sufficient motivation :) Either way, I'm excited about a new library. Plus, it looks a little easier to read (from the tiny amount of code that I've looked
2020 Oct 12
3
CentOS 8.2 / missing libc++ (libcxx-devel)
Hi community,
In CentOS 7 there is such rpm (libcxx-devel - it seems from EPEL
repository), but in CentOS 8 it isn't.
How is it possible to have it there as RPM? because alternative to build it
(libc++) from sources is a big headache (I need it in order to build v9 and
plv8 projects)
Thanks
2018 Jan 11
1
LLVM EH tables much larger than GCC's
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:21 AM, James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Ryan Prichard via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> 2. *Termination landing pads.*
>>
>> Clang sometimes uses a landing pad that calls __clang_call_terminate to
>> terminate the program. GCC instead leaves a gap in
2020 Oct 13
0
CentOS 8.2 / missing libc++ (libcxx-devel)
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, Alexandru Lazarev wrote:
> Hi community,
> In CentOS 7 there is such rpm (libcxx-devel - it seems from EPEL
> repository), but in CentOS 8 it isn't.
>
> How is it possible to have it there as RPM? because alternative to build it
> (libc++) from sources is a big headache (I need it in order to build v9 and
> plv8 projects)
Do you mean the