similar to: [LLVMdev] [3.6 Release] RC3 has been tagged

Hi Jack, On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > What are the acceptable performance regressions in the generated > code for a llvm release? We seem to be badly regressed in some > benchmarks (which I first noticed from the review of 3.6-rc1 at > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=llvm-clang-3.5-3.6-rc1).

Hello testers, RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch). RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4. Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to release. Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries

Hi testers, 3.6.0-rc2 was just tagged. Please test and build binaries. The tracking bug for 3.6 blockers is http://llvm.org/pr22374. Please file issues against it. Thanks for helping with the release! Hans

Dear testers, 8.0.0-rc3 was just tagged from the release_80 branch at r355015. We're running a little behind schedule now, but I think we're also close to be able to call this done. Please take a close look at this release candidate. Unless anything bad comes up, this is probably very similar to what the final release will look like. Testers, please run the test script, share your

Dear testers, 7.0.0-rc3 was just tagged (from branch revision r341805). No further release candidates are currently planned, so this is a release candidate in the real sense: unless any serious issues surface, this is what the final release will look like. Please run the test script, share your results and upload binaries. Please also take a look at the release notes and other docs; small

On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 04:28:55PM +0000, Renato Golin wrote: > On 31 January 2015 at 00:42, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > 3.6.0-rc2 was just tagged. Please test and build binaries. > > Hi Hans, > > I just built RC2 with the patch that fixes the NEON builds on ARM and > uploaded to the FTP site. It checks-all clean, but I'm running the >

Hello everyone, 3.7-rc3 has just been tagged. Testers, please test, build binaries, upload to the sftp and report results to this thread. Again, a lot of patches got merged between rc2 and rc3, but hopefully nothing that should upset things. One thing that did change is that the release script now correctly symlinks clang-tools-extra into the build. If this causes problems on your platform,

Final has been tagged, I think we're about to release it. On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com> wrote: > Are we waiting for an RC5? It seems like the release mirror on github has > no recent activity. > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com > > wrote: > >> Quick update

Dear testers, Release Candidate 3 has just been tagged [1]. Please build, test, and upload to the sftp. If there are no regressions from previous release candidates, this will be the last release candidate before the final release. Release notes can still go into the branch. Thanks again for all your work! Hans [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-branch-commits/2016-February/009866.html

Quick update before I move on to the final tag. > clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz > Still running due to a silly setup mistake on the first run (a broken > symlink to the test-suite source). Second attempt is a fair way through and > looks good so far though Default options were all good. Mips32 was about halfway but was good so far. >

We got everything, haven't we? On 26 February 2015 at 20:44, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com> wrote: > Final has been tagged, I think we're about to release it. > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Are we waiting for an RC5? It seems like the release mirror on github has >> no

It seems this is a cmake vs autoconf thing. With cmake, it builds correctly, but with autoconf I get the same error as you. I probably shouldn't have made this change while we were in the release process as it was potentially risky :-/ I've reverted it now, so hopefully the next build should be problem free. Thanks, Hans On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joerg Sonnenberger" <joerg at britannica.bec.de> > To: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu, "llvmdev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 7:42:11 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.6 Release] RC3 has been tagged > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:12:20AM -0800, Hans Wennborg wrote: > > I

Hi, I've just tagged 5.0.1-rc3, please test and report the results. Hopefully, this will be the last RC and the final release will be next week. -Tom

On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 05:51 AM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > Dear testers, > > Release Candidate 3 has just been tagged [1]. Please build, test, and > upload to the sftp. Uploaded: clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-15.10.tar.xz clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz On

Hi Dmitry, if I understood Hans clang-extra wasn't part of the build prior to rc3. Just delete it and run script with --no-checkout. On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > Hm, it does not seem to compile at all here? The build ends with: > > In file included from >

Are we waiting for an RC5? It seems like the release mirror on github has no recent activity. On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > Quick update before I move on to the final tag. > > > clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz > > Still running due to a silly setup mistake on the first run (a > broken >

Hello testers, 5.0.0-rc4 was just tagged. There were very few changes after rc3, and if nothing unexpected comes up, this is what the final release will look like. Please test and let me know if there are any issues. Cheers, Hans

[ Original posting see [1] ] >From [1]: ... Added: llvm/tags/RELEASE_380/rc3/ (props changed) - copied from r261685, llvm/branches/release_38/ ... The LLVM Git repositories have no "rc3" tag in "release_38" branch (as an example llvm.git#release_38 see [2]). Who is responsible for that or maybe better... can you activate the responsible(s)? Helpful is to add

Dear testers, 6.0.0-rc3 was just tagged, after r325901 on the branch. There are still a few open blockers, but I'm not sure we'll actually end up blocking on all of them. So depending on what comes up, this release candidate is probably pretty close to what the final release will look like (I'm still hoping for more release notes, though). I'm hoping we can get to