similar to: [LLVMdev] [PATCH 0/2 v3] add visibility hidden to tls entry points

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] [PATCH 0/2 v3] add visibility hidden to tls entry points"

2015 Feb 17
3
[LLVMdev] [PATCH 2/2 v3] add visibility hidden to tls entry points
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de> wrote: > Avoid redefined symbol errors in clang. Based on a suggestion from > Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> in > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19778. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de> > --- > v2: - no change > v3: - include util
2015 Feb 17
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH 1/2 v3] configure: add visibility macro detection to configure
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de> wrote: > This adds clang/gcc visibility macro detection to configure and util/macros.h. > This is can be used to conveniently add e.g. a "HIDDEN" attribute to a function. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de> > --- > v2: use VISIBILITY_*FLAGS instead of *FLAGS directly >
2015 Feb 26
2
[LLVMdev] [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2 v3] configure: add visibility macro detection to configure
Hi Marc On 17/02/15 09:40, Marc Dietrich wrote: > This adds clang/gcc visibility macro detection to configure and util/macros.h. > This is can be used to conveniently add e.g. a "HIDDEN" attribute to a function. > I believe this should be OK to go in regardless of the status of patch 2. There are just a couple of trivial nitpicks. > Signed-off-by: Marc Dietrich
2015 Feb 20
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH 0/2 v3] add visibility hidden to tls entry points
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de> wrote: >> Patch 1 adds a check for the compilers visibility macro to configure.ac. >> Patch 2 avoids redefined symbol errors in clang of the tls entry points. >> Based on a suggestion from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
2015 Feb 17
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH 2/2 v3] add visibility hidden to tls entry points
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2015, 11:58:06 schrieb Sedat Dilek: >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de> wrote: >> > Avoid redefined symbol errors in clang. Based on a suggestion from >> > Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> in
2015 Feb 10
2
[LLVMdev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLX with llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2
On 10/02/15 13:17, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 09 Feb 2015, at 18:52, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 07/02/15 22:42, Sedat Dilek wrote: > ... >>>> In file included from ../../src/mapi/entry.c:49: >>>> ./entry_x86-64_tls.h:66:1:
2015 Feb 14
4
[LLVMdev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLX with llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2
On 11 Feb 2015, at 11:16, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 10/02/15 13:17, Dimitry Andric wrote: >>> On 09 Feb 2015, at 18:52, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Emil Velikov
2015 Feb 09
2
[LLVMdev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLX with llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sedat, > > On 07/02/15 22:42, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> [ Please CC me I am not subscribed to mesa-dev and llvmdev MLs ] >> >> Hi, >> >> I already reported this when playing 1st time with my llvm-toolchain >> v3.6.0rc2 and mesa v10.3.7 [1]. >> The issue still
2015 Feb 16
2
[LLVMdev] [Mesa-dev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLXwithllvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2
Am Montag, 16. Februar 2015, 12:42:19 schrieb Sedat Dilek: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de> wrote: > > Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2015, 18:20:12 schrieb Dimitry Andric: > >> On 11 Feb 2015, at 11:16, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Emil Velikov > >> >
2014 Jul 30
3
[PATCH] libdrm: hide all private symbols
On 30/07/14 11:16, Christian K?nig wrote: > [CCing Emil as well] > > Am 30.07.2014 um 11:38 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >> Using -export-symbols-regex all private symbols are hidden, resulting in the >> following changes: > > Wasn't "-export-symbols-regex" exactly that stuff we are trying to avoid in mesa? > IMHO we should try to pick up Thierry
2014 Jul 30
2
[PATCH libdrm] configure: Support symbol visibility when available
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> > > Checks whether or not the compiler supports the -fvisibility option. If > so it sets the VISIBILITY_CFLAGS variable which can be added to the per > directory AM_CFLAGS where appropriate. > > By default all symbols will be hidden
2015 Feb 16
1
[LLVMdev] [Mesa-dev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLXwith llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2
Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2015, 18:20:12 schrieb Dimitry Andric: > On 11 Feb 2015, at 11:16, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 10/02/15 13:17, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >>> On 09 Feb 2015, at 18:52, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote:
2015 Feb 09
2
[LLVMdev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLX with llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2
On 09/02/15 17:44, Emil Velikov wrote: > Hi Sedat, > > On 07/02/15 22:42, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> [ Please CC me I am not subscribed to mesa-dev and llvmdev MLs ] >> >> Hi, >> >> I already reported this when playing 1st time with my llvm-toolchain >> v3.6.0rc2 and mesa v10.3.7 [1]. >> The issue still remains in mesa v10.4.4. >> >> So,
2015 Feb 07
5
[LLVMdev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLX with llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2
[ Please CC me I am not subscribed to mesa-dev and llvmdev MLs ] Hi, I already reported this when playing 1st time with my llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2 and mesa v10.3.7 [1]. The issue still remains in mesa v10.4.4. So, this is a field test to see if LLVM/Clang v3.6.0rc2 fits my needs. I see the following build-error... ... make[4]: Entering directory
2014 Jul 30
0
[PATCH libdrm] configure: Support symbol visibility when available
On 30/07/14 15:31, Rob Clark wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Thierry Reding > <thierry.reding at gmail.com> wrote: >> From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> >> >> Checks whether or not the compiler supports the -fvisibility option. If >> so it sets the VISIBILITY_CFLAGS variable which can be added to the per >> directory AM_CFLAGS
2014 Jul 30
0
[PATCH libdrm] configure: Support symbol visibility when available
From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> Checks whether or not the compiler supports the -fvisibility option. If so it sets the VISIBILITY_CFLAGS variable which can be added to the per directory AM_CFLAGS where appropriate. By default all symbols will be hidden via the VISIBILITY_CFLAGS. The drm_public macro can be used to mark symbols that should be exported. Signed-off-by: Thierry
2015 May 07
0
[ANNOUNCE] libdrm 2.4.61
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Release to fix regression in nouveau in 2.4.60, but brings lots of android changes and other fixes. Ben Skeggs (2): nouveau: restore check that avoids multiple user bos per kernel bo configure.ac: bump version to 2.4.61 for release Chih-Wei Huang (3): android: simplify the including rule of subdirs android: get rid of
2014 Jul 31
1
[libdrm PATCH 1/3] nouveau: Only export public functions.
This hides all the abi16_* functions and the nouveau_debug variable, they should have been private to begin with. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- nouveau/Makefile.am | 1 + nouveau/bufctx.c | 10 +++++----- nouveau/nouveau.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- nouveau/private.h | 1 + nouveau/pushbuf.c | 20
2017 Mar 13
1
[ANNOUNCE] intel-gpu-tools 1.18
A new intel-gpu-tools quarterly release is available with the following changes: Library changes: - Various changes to library functions so that they don't assume Intel hardware. (Lyude) - Added helper functions for managing synchronization primitives. (Robert Foss) - Added support for the new generic CRC capture kernel ABI. (Tomeu Vizoso) - Added Geminilake platform support. (Ander
2010 May 02
2
samba4 make error - drsblobs.so
Hello - make fails to build the latest git of samba4 - erroring on drsblobs.so. Below is a full log from autogen.sh to the make. Would you have any suggestions on proceeding? Thank you, Ryan ryan at test1:~/samba-master/source4$ sudo ./autogen.sh ./autogen.sh: running script/mkversion.sh ./script/mkversion.sh: 'version.h' created for Samba("4.0.0alpha12-GIT-d83850a")