similar to: [LLVMdev] alias result

Yes, in my example, %1 and %2 point to t. %3 points to t2. But t and t2 point to the same var, is it? That's where I'm confused. On 2/16/15 12:37 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Haopeng Liu" <hyliuhp at gmail.com> >> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> >> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >> Sent:

Oh, got it. Thanks for your explain. I misunderstand what getLocation does. If I would like to get the result of alias analysis referring to the stored value, what should I do in llvm? On 2/16/15 1:42 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Haopeng Liu" <hyliuhp at gmail.com> >> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> >>

t and t2 are two pointers defined in .c file. The definitions in .bc are: %thd = alloc i64, align 8 %t = alloca i64*, align 8 %t2 = alloca i64*, align 8 .c file likes this: int thd; int *t = &thd; int *t2 = t; On 2/16/15 12:28 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Haopeng Liu" <hyliuhp at gmail.com> >> To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu

I tried to compare two types. Because of renaming, the comparison result is not as expected. How to deal with renaming while comparing types? Best, Haopeng On 6/2/15 4:09 PM, Mehdi Amini wrote: > Hi Haopeng, > > One more element, I just noticed you are using LTO, I am not sure how it is implemented but my guess is that there is a shared LLVMContext. If multiple files include this

Hi Mehdi, Thanks for your reply. It seems caused by random rename because I saw %struct.StructTyName.692.475*, which might be twice renaming. Does this collision occur because this type is declared more than once? I encountered this problem when used clang to compile transmission 1.42 (http://download.transmissionbt.com/files/) with configuration: "./configure --disable-gtk". Then

Hi All, It seems that functions in callgraph remove all metadata info, such as dbg. Can I keep metadata in callgraph? Best, Haopeng

Hi, I'm trying to explore basicaa alias analysis. test.c: int main() { int a; int *p, *q; p = &a; q = p; ... } Commands: clang -emit-llvm -c -g -O0 test.c -o test.bc opt -basicaa -print-must-aliases test.bc However, the result shows that p and q are no alias. Could anyone explain it? Your help is much appreciated! -Haopeng

Hi All, I generated the following code with "clang -flto" command. void test(struct StruTyName *a) { ... } Then the type of test function is "void (%struct.StruTyName.100*)" by calling function::getFunctionType API. What's the meaning of number 100? Best, Haopeng

Hello everyone, I am trying to find the alias between a store instruction's pointer operand and function arguments. This is the code, virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { AU.addRequiredTransitive<AliasAnalysis>(); AU.addPreserved<AliasAnalysis>(); } virtual bool runOnFunction(Function &F) { AliasAnalysis &AA =

It contains the bitcode file(without any optimization) of the below program, void map(int *a) { *a=20; } int main(){ int *a=(int *)malloc(sizeof(int)); *a=15; map(a); return 0; } I want to check if the pointer operand of each store instruction aliases with the function's arguments. I have used below code for this, virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {

I have used the follwing command, opt -load LLVComMan.so -ComMan -memdep -tbaa -mem2reg maptest.ll -S What option other than -mem2reg should be included in this case to get the right results? Does the order in which I specify the optimizations to be run make a difference? Duncan Sands wrote: > > Hi Adarsh, > >> I want to check if the values a and b in the program alias.

Hi Adarsh, > I have used the follwing command, > opt -load LLVComMan.so -ComMan -memdep -tbaa -mem2reg maptest.ll -S > What option other than -mem2reg should be included in this case to get the > right results? Does the order in which I specify the optimizations to be run > make a difference? what is in maptest.ll? Ciao, Duncan.

Hi Has anybody done THD or THD-N measurements with the CELT Codec (bext would be on various bit rates) If someone could share results for Mono at 64kBit and Stereo at 128 and 196kBit it would be great. thank you very much Jochen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20100817/b1da17cc/attachment-0002.htm

I want to go a lot deeper with my tracing of MySQL and to do so I want to look into MySQL Thread Descriptors (class THD). Inside is a great bulk of information utilized by a great many of the core functions within MySQL... I really want to get in there. So far I''ve had no luck though. It''s a C++ class, and I''m afraid that I''m approaching it like a C struct,

Hi. I just installed Centos 4. I''m pretty sure that I chose to have it install postgresql but when the system came up, it wasn''t there. No worries. I installed it from the net with ''yum''. Unfortunately, when I started it up and it tried to init the database, I got a bunch of SELinux errors: Mar 3 13:24:22 dirty kernel: audit(1109874262.006:0): avc:

I want to check if the values a and b in the program alias. int main() { int *a,*b; a=(int *)malloc(sizeof(int)); b=(int *)malloc(sizeof(int)); *a=10; *b=8; return 0; } I use the below code for this (getAnalysisUsage method has been defined) AliasAnalysis::Location loc1=AliasAnalysis::Location(k1); //a AliasAnalysis::Location loc2=AliasAnalysis::Location(k2); //b AliasAnalysis::AliasResult

So, after looking at *doing* this, I'm left with more questions and no good answers. C++ has truly failed me today. This enum is currently designed (and even *documented* as being designed) to allow conversion-to-bool to detect whether any alias is possible (that is, only no-alias becomes false). This makes it *really* easy to write the overwhelming majority of test: if ("do things

> On 2015-Jun-15, at 16:29, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:56 PM Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > I like this colour: > > enum class AliasKind /* or AliasCategory? */ { > Null, > Unknown, > Partial, > Complete > }; > > So, the only

Please see Shuxin's proposal on "parallelizing post-IPO stage". It seems the two projects are related. Evan On Jul 16, 2013, at 3:33 AM, "Wan, Xiaofei" <xiaofei.wan at intel.com> wrote: > Hi, community: > > For the sake of our business need, I want to enable "Function-based parallel code generation" to boost up the compilation of single module,

Hi, community: For the sake of our business need, I want to enable "Function-based parallel code generation" to boost up the compilation of single module, please see the details of the design and provide your feedbacks on below aspects, thanks! 1. Is this idea the proper solution for my requirement 2. This new feature will be enabled by llc -thd=N and has no impact on original llc when