similar to: [LLVMdev] Building clang on Raspberry Pi2

Dear testers, 7.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r338847). It's early in the release process, but I'd like to find out what the status is of the branch on our various platforms. Please run the test script, share the results, and upload binaries. Thanks, Hans

Dear testers, 4.0.0-rc1 was just tagged from the branch, with r292377. There are still open merge requests and bugs, but I'd like to get the testing started to see what issues come up. Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how it goes. I'll upload source, docs, and your binaries to the web site once their ready. Thanks, Hans

Hello testers, 4.0.0-rc2 was just tagged from the branch at r294535. There are still open relase blocking bugs and merge requests, so this will not be the last release candidate, but we've had a lot of merges since the last one, and I'd like to see what the testing looks like. The test-release.sh script was updated to also include lld. Make sure you're using the latest version of

Hi, We have an upcoming project to migrate Samba first into a new Hardware then the AD migration. Our hardware is old and we need to migrate. Please allow me to explain the current setup - Server : Physical - OS: Ubuntu 14.04 running Samba 4.0.0. Even though it is running Samba 4, we are using configs from Samba3. - Roles: DC, DNS , DHCP and Shares - Database: TDB - DNS: BIND9 - Clients: Mix of

Dear WizaRds, I am struggling with the use of twophase in package survey. My goal is to compute a simple example in two phase sampling: phase 1: I sample n1=1000 circuit boards and find 80 non functional phase 2: Given the n1=1000 sample I sample n2=100 and find 15 non functional. Let's say, phase 2 shows this result together with phase 1: ...................phase1........

Hi testers, 3.6.0-rc2 was just tagged. Please test and build binaries. The tracking bug for 3.6 blockers is http://llvm.org/pr22374. Please file issues against it. Thanks for helping with the release! Hans

On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 18:11 +1000, Rob Thoman via samba wrote: > Hi Guys, > Have not had any feedback on this. I found the following article but not > sure if it is valid > > Here is what we are planning, high level > Phase1: > > - Add a new Samba 4 server (VM in a new hardware). Join it to the existing > domain > - Promote this server as DC in the Samba 3

Sounds like that was fixed on trunk also, in 0e8608b (I get the same on Windows.) On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:10 AM Neil Nelson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Uploaded Ubuntu 20.04 > > sha256sum clang+llvm-10.0.1-rc3-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz > 9a2b573b69a4c3d62d7a4accd9b164044cd5e8fbe68b056716c72cd0f81a134d > > FAIL: LLVM ::

Phase1 fails to build on openSUSE 13.2, can anyone see what's wrong from this log file? On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> > wrote: >

Hello everyone, It took a bit longer than planned due to master being a somewhat unstable at the branch point, but Release Candidate 1 has now been tagged as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/10.0.0/#rc1 Pre-built binaries will be added there as they become available. Please file bug reports for any issues you find as blockers of

I've been building clang on linux for a couple of years now, contributing to the testing on Ubuntu, but this one has me stumped: fatal error: 'asm/socket.h' file not found #include <asm/socket.h> [1556/4006] Building CXX object projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/CMakeFiles/RTSanitizerCommon.i386.dir/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc.o FAILED:

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > On 9 Feb 2017, at 01:33, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> 4.0.0-rc2 was just tagged from the branch at r294535. > > Building on FreeBSD 10 at least didn't crash this time, and lld built just fine. :) I uploaded the following: >

Hi, I've tagged 10.0.1-rc4, please test and report the results. -Tom

Hi all, Thanks for the info. Few observations from my side : LLVM : cortex-a8 vfpv3 : no vmla or vfma instruction emitted cortex-a8 vfpv4 : no vmla or vfma instruction emitted (This is invalid though as cortex-a8 does not have vfpv4) cortex-a8 vfpv4 with ffp-contract=fast : vfma instruction emitted ( this seems a bug to me!! If cortex-a8 doesn't come with vfpv4 then vfma instructions

Hi sir, I have built the test suits in following steps: 0. $cd LLVM_GCC_DIR; $gunzip --stdout llvm-gcc-4.2-*version*-* platform*.tar.gz | tar -xvf - 1. $cd SRC_DIR/llvm-2.8/projects 2. $svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/trunk test-suite 3.$cd OBJ_DIR; 4. $SRC_DIR/configure --prefix=INS_DIR --enable-debug-runtime --disable-optimized --enable-debug-symbols

Dear testers, Start your engines; 6.0.0-rc1 was just tagged. I know there are still open blockers and it's early in the process in a way, but I'd like to find out where we are. Please run the test script, let me know the results, and upload binaries. Thanks, Hans

Good day, LLVMers! We are starting on our third (and hopefully last) round of testing for LLVM 3.0. Please visit: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/rc3/ for the sources. There are also binaries for Darwin up there, with more to come during the week. Please build this release candidate, test it out on your projects, and let us know if you find any regressions from the 2.9 release. Please keep

My thought was that its reasonable to expect no warnings when building from bootstrap (as you say) and the last release of Clang. Generally, I think we should work around warnings in the last release of Clang if only for the convenience of folks using that release to build stage1 and using Werror. Certainly, we tend to fix warnings even from earlier Clang versions and from GCC in order to keep

rc1 did not exhibit this mismatch. A repeat of the rc2 build repeated the mismatch. I diff'd the disassembly between phase 2 and phase 3 and the difference is the same on both builds. The difference follows: # diff x86isel_p{2,3}.s 2c2 < Phase2/Release/llvmCore-8.0.0-rc2.obj/lib/Target/X86/CMakeFiles/LLVMX86CodeGen.dir/X86ISelLowering.cpp.o: file format elf64-x86-64 --- >

On 7 November 2011 22:00, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > We are starting on our third (and hopefully last) round of testing for LLVM 3.0. Please visit: > >        http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/rc3/ > > for the sources. There are also binaries for Darwin up there, with more to come during the week. Please build this release candidate, test it out on your