Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Noop in sys::getDefaultTargetTriple()?"
2017 May 03
3
Runtime-configurable LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE by env var
I have been working for extending test coverage for years.
Nowadays, I have several cross-testing (target != host). See
http://bb.pgr.jp/console
Each of them (test-*-linux) is doing;
- Assume a preceding builder passes with warming ccache.
- All compilation units will hit ccache whenever the tree is built before
lit.
- Almost all compilation units will hit ccache except for Host.cpp when
2015 May 22
2
[LLVMdev] How to determine the architecture that clang/llvm will compile in CMake.
I've been working on getting the LLVM OpenMP library to build smoothly alongside llvm/clang using CMake, but one problem I'm having is determining exactly which CMake option designates the architecture the compiler will compile. I see LLVM_TARGET_ARCH, LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD, LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE, etc.
I thought I should just ask which one designates the architecture the compiler
2013 Jun 21
1
[LLVMdev] Patch for the fact that all llvm python scripts are python 2.x compatible.
720beaedce6f19c81156fe20168f85989a8db53d
CMakeLists.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt
index bb70f15..e327427 100644
--- a/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ set(LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE
"${LLVM_HOST_TRIPLE}" CACHE STRING
set(TARGET_TRIPLE "${LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE}")
2017 Feb 03
2
Build status expectations for experimental targets
> On Feb 3, 2017, at 12:45 PM, Dylan McKay via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> The builder isn’t marked as experimental so I think the expectation is that people keep it green and contact the bot owner if they need help figuring out why their change makes it red. That said, it sounds a bit odd to have a non-experimental builder for an experimental backend.
>
2014 Apr 10
2
[LLVMdev] CMake configuration: Detecting zlib.h header in windows.
Hi,
I have having hard time to let cmake configuration detect the zlib
header in windows with "Visual Studio 12" generator. My cmake
configuration goes like
>> Set path, include and lib environment variables to point to zlib
headers and libraries. Cmake version is 2.8.12.2
cmake -G "Visual Studio 12" -D LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD:STRING=%TARG% -D
2017 Jun 05
2
Question
Can you also please tell me how can I find out the ABI (application binary interface)?
Thanks,Iulia
On Monday, June 5, 2017 8:58 PM, Bruce Hoult <bruce at hoult.org> wrote:
grep name /proc/cpuinfo
Then look up the model number in
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Xeon_microprocessors
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Iulia Stirb via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
2016 Dec 02
2
Failed to configure LLVM for use with Musl
I want to build LLVM-based toolchain with Musl, I have LLVM sources with clang and lld (under `tools` directory) and libunwind, compiler-rt, libcxx and libcxxabi (under `projects` directory). All are the latest versions cloned from GitHub mirror, branch `master`.
I'm trying to configure with the following options:
CLANG_DEFAULT_CXX_STDLIB = libc++
CLANG_DEFAULT_RTLIB = compiler-rt
2017 Jun 06
3
libc++ failed to link against musl
On 5 Jun 2017, at 15:17, Jonathan Roelofs via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/5/17 5:17 AM, Dmitry Golovin via llvm-dev wrote:
>> I'm trying to build LLVM, Clang, LLD, compiler-rt, libc++, libc++abi and libunwind with musl-based toolchain.
>>
>> The configuration is the following:
>>
>> LIBCXX_HAS_MUSL_LIBC=ON
>>
2016 Dec 19
0
libcompiler_rt.so and libcompiler_rt.a are not being built
> On Dec 18, 2016, at 3:48 AM, Dmitry Golovin <dima at golovin.in> wrote:
>
>
>
> 16.12.2016, 18:23, "Vedant Kumar" <vsk at apple.com>:
>>> On Dec 16, 2016, at 7:06 AM, Dmitry Golovin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> I want to build LLVM-based toolchain with Musl, I have LLVM sources with clang and
2017 Jun 05
3
libc++ failed to link against musl
I'm trying to build LLVM, Clang, LLD, compiler-rt, libc++, libc++abi and libunwind with musl-based toolchain.
The configuration is the following:
LIBCXX_HAS_MUSL_LIBC=ON
LIBCXX_HAS_GCC_S_LIB=OFF
CLANG_DEFAULT_CXX_STDLIB=libc++
CLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld
CLANG_DEFAULT_RTLIB=compiler-rt
LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE=x86_64-pc-linux-musl
LLVM_TARGET_ARCH=x86_64
2016 Dec 16
2
libcompiler_rt.so and libcompiler_rt.a are not being built
I want to build LLVM-based toolchain with Musl, I have LLVM sources with clang and lld (under `tools` directory) and libunwind, compiler-rt, libcxx and libcxxabi (under `projects` directory). All are the latest versions cloned from GitHub mirror, branch `master`.
I'm trying to configure with the following options:
CLANG_DEFAULT_CXX_STDLIB = libc++
CLANG_DEFAULT_RTLIB = compiler-rt
2016 Dec 16
0
libcompiler_rt.so and libcompiler_rt.a are not being built
> On Dec 16, 2016, at 7:06 AM, Dmitry Golovin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> I want to build LLVM-based toolchain with Musl, I have LLVM sources with clang and lld (under `tools` directory) and libunwind, compiler-rt, libcxx and libcxxabi (under `projects` directory). All are the latest versions cloned from GitHub mirror, branch `master`.
>
> I'm
2014 Aug 20
3
[LLVMdev] llvm::Triple support for haswell-enabled x86_64
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote:
> Note that it’s not exactly equivalent to enabling -march=core-avx2. It’s
> really close, but not 100% the same.
What is the difference? and why? It seems really confusing to have this
divergence, or to be unable to replicate the *exact* behavior of this (very
weird, and IMO *bad* triple) with the standard
2016 Dec 18
3
libcompiler_rt.so and libcompiler_rt.a are not being built
16.12.2016, 18:23, "Vedant Kumar" <vsk at apple.com>:
>> On Dec 16, 2016, at 7:06 AM, Dmitry Golovin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> I want to build LLVM-based toolchain with Musl, I have LLVM sources with clang and lld (under `tools` directory) and libunwind, compiler-rt, libcxx and libcxxabi (under `projects` directory). All are
2012 Jul 10
1
[LLVMdev] cmake and setting target triple
Hi,
What is the Cmake equivalent to configures target option [ ./configure
--target=avr-atmel-none] ?
--John
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120710/5405f54b/attachment.html>
2013 Jul 14
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] x86/asm: avoid mnemonics without type suffix
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
<artagnon at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I was trying to show a reduced case where gas doesn't complain, but
> llvm-mc does. Try compiling this with llvm-mc, and you'll get:
Ok. So your commit message and explanation was pure and utter tripe,
and the real reason you want this is that llvm-mc is broken.
Please fix llvm-mc
2016 Apr 25
2
bug: cross-compile Clang/LLVM for ARM using Clang/LLVM
Hi renato,
1. The command above is followed by the guide[ HowToCrossCompileLLVM.rst ]
and I specify some path(ex. <path-to-host-bin>).
2. The including x86_64 libraries is added because of some missing
libraries(ex. "error: Host compiler appears to require libatomic, but
cannot find it"). As I have found that the bugs needed to dealt with is
some ARM-dependent libraries, I
2017 Feb 03
2
Build status expectations for experimental targets
> On Feb 3, 2017, at 4:18 AM, Tobias Grosser via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Dylan McKay via llvm-dev wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> Every few weeks, a change is committed to trunk that breaks the AVR
>> buildbot.
>>
>> A problem presents when commit authors do not fix the build, and just
2017 Feb 28
3
LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD
I'm trying to build LLVM on Windows 10 for x86_64. The cmake cmdline I used
is
c:\cmake-3.8.0-rc1-win64-x64\bin\cmake.exe -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=x86_64
-G "Visual Studio 14" .
And this ultimately gives me:
llvm-build: error: invalid target to enable: 'x86_64' (not in project)
The source I'm trying to build is the llvm-3.8.0.src.tar.xz I got from
2018 Jan 05
1
How to debug a test that fails only on some build bots?
Thanks! It looks like this is sorted out now.
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Friedman, Eli <efriedma at codeaurora.org>
wrote:
> On 1/4/2018 4:51 PM, Adrian McCarthy via llvm-dev wrote:
>
> I tried to land a small fix before going on vacation at the end of the
> year, but I had to revert it because it broke on a few of the build bots,
> specifically