similar to: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Raise minimum required CMake version to 3.0

> On Feb 24, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > > On 09.02.2015 20:12, Chris Bieneman wrote: >> It came up on another thread that our current minimum required CMake version 2.8.8, has some bugs that cause issues when building with MSVC + Ninja, and one potential solution was to raise the minimum required version of CMake. >> >> CMake

> On Feb 24, 2015, at 11:13 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Feb 24, 2015, at 9:33 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Feb 24, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >>> >>> On 09.02.2015 20:12, Chris Bieneman wrote: >>>> It

My list of useful features in newer CMake versions, that I would like to see used: CMake 2.8.10 * INTERFACE_LIBRARY (we already use this by hacking around the CMake version) CMake 2.8.11 * Targets can now have dependencies that are arbitrary files instead of just link dependencies (http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Epics/CMake_target_usage_requirements

On 24.02.2015 17:45, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 09.02.2015 20:12, Chris Bieneman wrote: >> It came up on another thread that our current minimum required CMake >> version 2.8.8, has some bugs that cause issues when building with MSVC >> + Ninja, and one potential solution was to raise the minimum required >> version of CMake. >> >> CMake 3.0 is now 6 months

I’m not too familiar with Ubuntu’s LTS releases, but from some google digging I believe there are 3 active LTS releases. 10.04 has CMake 2.8.0 (which is already below our minimum), but 10.04 will be dropping out of LTS this year. 12.04 has CMake 2.8.7 (also below our minimum) 14.04 has CMake 2.8.12.2, which should also have the fix for MSVC Based on this, it might be reasonable to update the

Apple doesn’t ship CMake publicly. Our internal build clusters should all be running 2.8.12.2 or later. Any OS X users not on CMake 2.8.12.2 can always download install packages from CMake.org <http://cmake.org/>. -Chris > On Feb 9, 2015, at 11:46 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at

+Galina, and Takumi This was a very short lived change :-). Looks like we have some bots that need to be updated. -Chris > On Feb 9, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com <mailto:beanz at apple.com>> wrote: > Apple doesn’t ship CMake publicly. Our internal

> On Mar 10, 2015, at 2:53 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > > On 10 March 2015 at 21:30, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: >> In the absence of specific features which would make our use of CMake >> significantly better, I'm inclined to stick roughly to the version of CMake >> in the latest LTS release of ubuntu (I

I don't oppose the subject. I will update cmake within a few days. 2015-02-10 7:17 GMT+09:00 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>: > Now, with more Galina and Takumi on the To line. ;-) > > ~Aaron > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: >> +Galina, and Takumi >> >> This was a very short lived change :-).

Galina and Takumi, Are we ready to update the minimum required version to 2.8.12.2? -Chris > On Feb 12, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > > Chandler's feedback was that we should go to 2.8.12.2 instead of 3.0 because of Ubuntu's LTS release. > > -Chris > > > > On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova

I'm with Takumi, and prefer to go on a safe route. Takumi, unless I'm missing something you were checking cmake 3.x with LLVM. How does it look like? Did you discover any problem? Thanks Galina On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:28 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote: > I missed the context. We may stand on 2.8.12.2 at first. > > I will update my cmake from

Hello LLVM-Dev! I would like to request that we raise the minimum required CMake version to 2.8.12.2. My primary reason is that I would like to re-land this patch http://reviews.llvm.org/D8380 <http://reviews.llvm.org/D8380> which broke the buildbots due to using a CMake 2.8.12 feature (see: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/polly-amd64-linux/builds/28499/steps/cmake-configure/logs/stdio

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > (adding chandler to the To line) > > On Mar 10, 2015, at 12:29 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > > Chandler previously asked to ensure we stay with a cmake version that is > available in the Ubuntu packages. If you want to drop this requirement, you > probably want to

I have moved onto the next phase and committed r229185, which makes VS2013 our minimum version. I will revert if issues arise, and we can rinse and repeat as necessary. Once it sticks for a bit I’ll update the docs too. -Chris > On Feb 9, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > > I agree with Aaron, this should not be a blocker because the workaround is

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Chris Bieneman <cbieneman at apple.com> wrote: > +Alex Bradbury > > Sounds to me like we have no known users still on VS 2012. > > So, how about we plan to move forward again with Chandler’s proposal for making this transition. For those who don’t want to dig through to the beginning here’s the basic plan: > > 1) Loop in cfe-dev and

Starting a new thread to loop in cfe-dev and lldb-dev. For those not following along there has been a thread on llvm-dev about moving the minimum required Visual Studio version to 2013. The motivating reason is this will allow us to take advantage of a bunch of C++11 features that are not supported by MSVC 2012. According to MSDN (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh567368.aspx) the list is:

Meant to send this yesterday, but I want to remind everyone that we’re going to be raising the CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 next week. If you maintain bots please ensure that your bots are updated by end of day 5/29 so that we can move on 5/30 (next Monday). I have already heard from most bot owners either saying they had made the change, or scheduled to make it. If you have any questions or

I am ready, regarding to, http://bb.pgr.jp/ On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:54 AM Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > Meant to send this yesterday, but I want to remind everyone that we’re > going to be raising the CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 next week. > > If you maintain bots please ensure that your bots are updated by end of > day 5/29 so that we can move on 5/30

All the MIPS buildbots are ready too. From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of NAKAMURA Takumi via llvm-dev Sent: 25 May 2016 23:03 To: Chris Bieneman; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org; lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [Attn: Bot Owners!] Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 I am ready, regarding to, http://bb.pgr.jp/ On

cmake is a big dependency, but it doesn't seem to have many dependencies itself. They say it's just a C++ compiler and a make (not necessarily gnu). Probably there are one or two more than that :-) A shell, for a start; git or tar/gzip etc. The current *nix source tarball is 6.4 MB gzipped. Just for fun I grabbed it and tried building on four machines: - 3.4 GHz i7 3770 with Ubuntu