similar to: [LLVMdev] Any mechanism available for link time inlineing?

> On Feb 12, 2015, at 8:15 AM, mobi phil <mobi at mobiphil.com> wrote: > > sorry to insist. While I do not beleive the question was the dumbest in the world, would love to know to find out some info, please find belowe the short version of the question: > > Is there already in LLVM or is there any plan to support some mechanism for static/dynamic inline-ing? It is already

mobi phil wrote: > thanks, sounds great, heard about llvm-lto, but was not following in > details. I have an llvm-lto in my dev branch build....now what I do not > find are some example on how to use it for link time inline-ing. In > worst case have to deal with the overhead to experiment With what linker? LLVM LTO is available by default with Apple's XCode development

Hi mobi, Sorry, I am new to clang AST and can not get the point you mentioned. :-( What I try to do is develop a tool that can analyze data dependence at runtime. Therefore, I need to analyze trace containing memory accessing information (eg. arrays within loops). To do that, I first instrument a recording function to get addresses of load/store instructions. However, there are

Dear Dibyendu and Mobi, Thanks for your help! :-) I finally figure it out. The solution is really simple. I just need to generate a new bitcode file with the following command: ----- opt -mem2reg -indvars test1.bc -o test2.bc ----- Then the load/store for induction variables will be removed and replaced by PHI instructions and all remaining load/store instructions are those I am interested in. I

Hi, would like to use LLVM as backend for a compiler. One of the features I would like to implement is segment based addressing for position independent data. For some it may sound strange, for others the opposite. No need to write complex story. Imagine you have a custom alocator that manages an area of 1GB of memory. Your application uses a custom allocator to allocate memory inside this area,

Greetings, I love the R system and am sincerely grateful for the great effort the product and contributors are delivering. My question is as follows: I am trying to use S4 style classes but cannot write functions that modify an object because paramter passing is by value. For example I want to do this: setGeneric("setData", function(this,fcn,k){ standardGeneric("setData")

Hi LLVM-ers, I try to develop my custom dynamic data dependence tool (focusing on nested loops), currently I can successfully get the trace including load/store address, loop information, etc. However, when I try to analyze dynamic data dependence based on the pairwise method described in [1], the load/store for iteration variables may interfere my analysis (I only care about the load/store for

Dear R-users, I am trying to use the grep function to test whether a particular string is of the form "n.../mydir/myfile.mytype.myext". Anything between n and mytype could vary, and anything after mytype could vary. I tried to proceed by steps to build my regular expression... but I do not really understand why the last call of the following code do not work. Any help would be

Hi, On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Martinez, Javier E < javier.e.martinez at intel.com> wrote: > Hello,**** > > ** ** > > I’m trying to change the default behavior for how structures are passed to > functions to use pass-by-value. Currently LLVM’s default behavior is to > pass structures by reference. I’m not disputing the benefits of this but I > really want to

Hello, I'm trying to change the default behavior for how structures are passed to functions to use pass-by-value. Currently LLVM's default behavior is to pass structures by reference. I'm not disputing the benefits of this but I really want to change the default behavior for experimentation purposes. To this end I've changed the code in DefaultABIInfo::classifyArgumentType() to

Justin, http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#structure-type "Identified types can be recursive, can be opaqued, and are never uniqued." Do you think it would be less descriptive? "Identified type, aka named llvm::StructType, is never uniqued against other identified types nor literal types, aka unnamed StructType(s)." ? See also;

With primitive types, I can interchange literal usage and type aliases in IR: %mytype = type i32 define void @foo(%mytype* %ptr) { %t1 = load *%mytype** %ptr store i32 *%t1*, *i32** %ptr ret void } But for structs, I cannot: %mytype = type { i32, i32 } define void @foo(%mytype* %ptr) { %t1 = load *%mytype** %ptr store* { i32, i32 }* %t1, *{ i32, i32 }** %ptr ret void }

I am new to Rails and Ruby, and to OO languages, and seem to be making a very silly mistake somewhere here. Can anybody help? I am trying to write an application which involves ''exercises'', each of which consists of several ''templates''. This is based on MySQL tables with these names. I have models and controllers, built with the Rails Scaffold, for both

This is possibly the dumbest question I have asked ever, but how do you set ACLs on files within a ZFS filesystem? Trying to use setfacl(1) diverts me to the acl(5) manpage; well, I know that I need to use NFSv4 style ACLs, but where is the utility to do so? This is on Solaris 10 Update 2. Thanks, Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don''t understand it at all.

Hi all, I''m struggling with the following: I have a defined type wrapped in a class: class myclass { define mytype(bla) { file { "blabla": .... } exec { "blablabla": ... } } } And I access the defined type in my other class by doing this: class otherclass { include myclass myclass::mytype { "alb": ... } # and here I want to

Dear R users, Suppose I have the following data.frame: myID myType myNum1 myNum2 myNum3 a Single 10 11 12 b Single 15 25 35 c Double 22 33 44 d Double 4 6 8 and I want to have new records: myID myType myNum1 myNum2 myNum3 e Single 12.5 18

Hi everyone, I have been trying to extend Rcpp with my own wrap and as templates. Two issues: 1) I need to explicitly call wrap. Is that expected? So for example I wrote this specialization: template<> SEXP Rcpp::wrap(std::vector<TimedOptDouble> const& entries) { std::vector<double> sec_times; std::vector<double> doubles; for(auto const& entry : entries) {

Hi, Sorry I fat fingered an earlier send in the previous email. I was trying to say: On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: >> +1 Exactly this. >> I don't think C programmer will not understand using. The "=" makes it much >> simpler to read, even if it is the first time you see it, which is not the >>

Howdy all, This may be the dumbest question in the world, but how can you "add one month" to a Date object? I can''t just add 30 days, because months have varying lengths. Any help would be much appreciated... Thanks! -Neal --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

Let''s start with this: class whatever ( $myType=''other'' ) { file { "some-config-file": ... content => $myType ? { ''this'' => template("whatever/this.erb"), ''that'' => template("whatever/that.erb"), ''other'' =>