similar to: [LLVMdev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLX with llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLX with llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2"

2015 Feb 09
2
[LLVMdev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLX with llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2
On 09/02/15 17:44, Emil Velikov wrote: > Hi Sedat, > > On 07/02/15 22:42, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> [ Please CC me I am not subscribed to mesa-dev and llvmdev MLs ] >> >> Hi, >> >> I already reported this when playing 1st time with my llvm-toolchain >> v3.6.0rc2 and mesa v10.3.7 [1]. >> The issue still remains in mesa v10.4.4. >> >> So,
2015 Feb 09
2
[LLVMdev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLX with llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sedat, > > On 07/02/15 22:42, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> [ Please CC me I am not subscribed to mesa-dev and llvmdev MLs ] >> >> Hi, >> >> I already reported this when playing 1st time with my llvm-toolchain >> v3.6.0rc2 and mesa v10.3.7 [1]. >> The issue still
2015 Feb 14
4
[LLVMdev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLX with llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2
On 11 Feb 2015, at 11:16, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 10/02/15 13:17, Dimitry Andric wrote: >>> On 09 Feb 2015, at 18:52, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Emil Velikov
2015 Feb 10
2
[LLVMdev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLX with llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2
On 10/02/15 13:17, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 09 Feb 2015, at 18:52, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 07/02/15 22:42, Sedat Dilek wrote: > ... >>>> In file included from ../../src/mapi/entry.c:49: >>>> ./entry_x86-64_tls.h:66:1:
2015 Feb 20
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH 0/2 v3] add visibility hidden to tls entry points
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de> wrote: >> Patch 1 adds a check for the compilers visibility macro to configure.ac. >> Patch 2 avoids redefined symbol errors in clang of the tls entry points. >> Based on a suggestion from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
2015 Feb 16
1
[LLVMdev] [Mesa-dev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLXwith llvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2
Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2015, 18:20:12 schrieb Dimitry Andric: > On 11 Feb 2015, at 11:16, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 10/02/15 13:17, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >>> On 09 Feb 2015, at 18:52, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote:
2015 Feb 16
2
[LLVMdev] [Mesa-dev] mesa-10.4.4: BROKEN TLS support in GLXwithllvm-toolchain v3.6.0rc2
Am Montag, 16. Februar 2015, 12:42:19 schrieb Sedat Dilek: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de> wrote: > > Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2015, 18:20:12 schrieb Dimitry Andric: > >> On 11 Feb 2015, at 11:16, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Emil Velikov > >> >
2015 Feb 17
7
[LLVMdev] [PATCH 0/2 v3] add visibility hidden to tls entry points
Patch 1 adds a check for the compilers visibility macro to configure.ac. Patch 2 avoids redefined symbol errors in clang of the tls entry points. Based on a suggestion from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> in http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19778. Tested with gcc 4.9 and clang 3.6(rc) Marc Dietrich (2): configure: add visibility macro detection to configure
2015 May 24
2
[RFC PATCH 00/11] Implement ARB_cull_distance
On 24.05.2015 20:25, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > I'm having a bit of trouble tracing through this. What happens if I > have a shader that just does: > > gl_ClipDistance[0] = 1; > gl_CullDistance[0] = 1; > > what does the resulting TGSI look like? (Assuming that clip plane 0 is > enabled.) What about the generated nvc0 code (for the vertex shader)? (hack up a patch for this,
2016 Feb 25
1
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
> Which combination of cmake/ninja versions are you using (latest are > v3.4.3 and v1.6.0)? > With this combination I could reduce build-time down from approx. 3h down to 01h20m. $ egrep -i 'jobs|ninja' llvm-build/CMakeCache.txt //Program used to build from build.ninja files. CMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM:FILEPATH=/opt/cmake/bin/ninja //Define the maximum number of concurrent compilation
2016 Mar 01
2
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Chris Bieneman <cbieneman at apple.com> wrote: > > There are a few notes I'd like to add to this thread. > > (1) we have a number of places throughout out CMake build where we use features from newer CMakes gated by version checks. Most of these features are performance or usability related. None of them are correctness. Using the latest
2016 Mar 01
2
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
For faster builds and rebuilds you should definitely read: https://blogs.s-osg.org/an-introduction-to-accelerating-your-build-with-clang/ https://blogs.s-osg.org/a-conclusion-to-accelerating-your-build-with-clang/ Hope this helps! On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:17 PM, ChrisBieneman via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Mar 1, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Mehdi Amini
2016 Mar 02
2
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
Hey Chris, Sedat was asking for a way to "to speedup my build" and those blog posts were really helpful to me. Anyway LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS sounds very cool, hope you will push your code soon! On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Chris Bieneman <cbieneman at apple.com> wrote: > Fabio, the work I was mentioning here is an extension beyond those blog > posts. > >
2015 May 24
2
[RFC PATCH 00/11] Implement ARB_cull_distance
On 24.05.2015 21:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Tobias Klausmann > <tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> wrote: >> >> On 24.05.2015 20:25, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>> I'm having a bit of trouble tracing through this. What happens if I >>> have a shader that just does: >>> >>> gl_ClipDistance[0] = 1;
2016 Mar 03
2
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
> On Mar 2, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > > I got some more inspirations on how to speedup my build and integrated > the URLs into my scripts (attached). > > For example to use GOLD as linker or to use '-O3' OptLevel maybe in > combination with LTO and PGO (using '-O3 -flto -fprofile-use'). LTO *will* slow down
2016 Feb 25
2
[llvm-3.8-ec3] cmake-2.8.12 and gcc-4.6: Host compiler appears to require libatomic, but cannot find it.
Hi, when I switch to an unsupported GCC like v4.6.4 to build LLVM v3.8-rc3 with cmake I get the following: ... -- Looking for __atomic_fetch_add_4 in atomic -- Looking for __atomic_fetch_add_4 in atomic - not found CMake Error at cmake/modules/CheckAtomic.cmake:36 (message): Host compiler appears to require libatomic, but cannot find it. Call Stack (most recent call first):
2012 Mar 01
1
[Bug 46810] New: Mesa Failing To Build
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46810 Bug #: 46810 Summary: Mesa Failing To Build Classification: Unclassified Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau
2012 Jul 29
1
Mesa build issue... is it just me?
Anyone else getting this when building the latest mesa? make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/local/nouveau/mesa2/mesa/src/gallium/targets/dri-nouveau' gcc -c -I. -I../../../../src/mesa/drivers/dri/common -Iserver -I../../../../include -I../../../../include/GL/internal -I../../../../src/mapi -I../../../../src/gallium/include -I../../../../src/gallium/auxiliary
2015 Mar 09
5
[LLVMdev] Build failure with compiler-rt on trunk under linux
I've been building clang on linux for a couple of years now, contributing to the testing on Ubuntu, but this one has me stumped: fatal error: 'asm/socket.h' file not found #include <asm/socket.h> [1556/4006] Building CXX object projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/CMakeFiles/RTSanitizerCommon.i386.dir/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc.o FAILED:
2015 Oct 26
2
MAPI Properties?
I'm using Dovceot/IMAP on Linux and Outlook clients on WIN7 workstations. Mail on Linux is stored in Maildir format. I'm searching for where Outook keeps its information on color categories in IMAP. According to Diane Poremsky at slipstick.com, "Outlook stores it in the mapi properties of each message. If you use MFCMAPI to viuw the messages, you'll see the properties."