similar to: [LLVMdev] [3.6 Release] Release Candidate 2 available

On 05/02/2015 18:34, Hans Wennborg wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> Source and binaries for LLVM 3.6.0-rc2 are now available at >> http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.6.0/ >> >> Please try them out, run tests, build your favourite projects, and >> *file bugs* about anything that

Hi all, I would really like to get a patch into 3.6 for libc++. The patch renames template parameters with the names '_A' and '_V' to longer names. '_A' is frequently defined in ctypes.h and that could cause libc++ to not compile. I'm fairly sure the code was added between 3.5 and 3.6 so that would make this a regression. The patch can be found here:

Marshall, you're the owner here. Is this OK to merge? On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > Yes, please. > > -Dimitry > >> On 06 Feb 2015, at 16:07, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I would really like to get a patch into 3.6 for libc++. The patch >> renames

Hi testers, 3.6.0-rc2 was just tagged. Please test and build binaries. The tracking bug for 3.6 blockers is http://llvm.org/pr22374. Please file issues against it. Thanks for helping with the release! Hans

On 31 Jan 2015, at 01:42, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > Hi testers, > > 3.6.0-rc2 was just tagged. Please test and build binaries. > > The tracking bug for 3.6 blockers is http://llvm.org/pr22374. Please > file issues against it. > > Thanks for helping with the release! This time I got an error during check-all, on i386-unknown-freebsd10:

Hello testers, Start your engines, RC3 has just been tagged (at r229050 on the branch). If this one looks good, it will become the release. There has been quite a bit of activity on the branch since RC2; let's hope it's all goodness :-) Please let me know how it looks, and upload binaries to the sftp as usual. Thanks for all your efforts so far! - Hans

Hi testers! 3.6.0-rc1 was just tagged, so testing can begin. I'm not super familiar with the testing script yet, but I believe the idea is to run it as follows: $ utils/release/test-release.sh -release 3.6.0 -rc 1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu With the -triple value substituted for your platform. Bill's 3.5rc1 email also said 'test-suite' needs to be run by hand. Please

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > On 31 Jan 2015, at 01:42, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >> Hi testers, >> >> 3.6.0-rc2 was just tagged. Please test and build binaries. >> >> The tracking bug for 3.6 blockers is http://llvm.org/pr22374. Please >> file issues against it. >>

Hi, i'd like to install R 2.5 on an Ubuntu 14.04. I have a special software requiring this old version. While ./configure, i get the following error: checking for mbstate_t... yes checking for X... no configure: error: --with-x=yes (default) and X11 headers/libs are not available The problem is that i don't know which headers or libraries are missing, and when i search with aptitude in

Hi! At night, when having my GNU Hurd maintainer hat on, I'm currently working on porting LLVM, clang et al. to x86-class systems using the GNU Hurd as their kernel, <http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/>. In the following, I'll just use LLVM to refer to the whole suite of tools. To some extent, LLVM already works on GNU/Hurd; thanks for constructing it in a portable fashion. From

Hello all, Source and binaries for LLVM 3.6.0-rc4 are available at http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.6.0/ There were only a few new patches since rc3: an infloop fix (r229421) a few X86 fixes (r229555, r229561 and r229564), a GCC 5 bootstrap fix (PR22625) and performance regression fix for PR22589. If this one looks good, it will be promoted to 'final' sometime next week. Thanks again to

Could we aim for mid/late January? I'd like our target triple problems to be sorted out for LLVM 3.6 if I can and early-January doesn't leave many working days to get that finished. Especially given that many people take some holiday around Christmas and New Year. > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On

Dear testers, 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183. This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue. Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how everything goes. >From this point, the branch

Dear testers, 6.0.0-rc3 was just tagged, after r325901 on the branch. There are still a few open blockers, but I'm not sure we'll actually end up blocking on all of them. So depending on what comes up, this release candidate is probably pretty close to what the final release will look like (I'm still hoping for more release notes, though). I'm hoping we can get to

Thanks! Added to the release page now. PR44517 is marked as wontfix. Should we re-open it? PR44518 :-( Should we add this to the list or release blockers? On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 2:04 PM Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > Uploaded ARM & AArch64: > a60394b6508a9b66043f221f87eb4e2f5859f918f46e406b2c1e942d50ead7dc >

Dear testers, 5.0.0-rc2 was just tagged. I know we still have a bunch of open release blockers, but there has been a lot of merged patches and I'd like to find out what the status is. Please build, test and upload binaries to the sftp. When uploading, make sure to use the /data/testers-uploads/ directory on the server. Let me know if there are any issues. I'll upload sources, docs and

Hello everyone, After some delay, the llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3 tag was just created. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/11.0.0/#rc3 and https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/tag/llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3 Pre-built binaries will be added as they become ready. Please file bug reports for any issues you find as blockers of https://llvm.org/pr46725 Release testers:

Just to save someone else a few seconds of googling: when you try to R CMD check with recent versions of R-devel and you get * checking PDF version of manual ... WARNING LaTeX errors when creating PDF version. This typically indicates Rd problems. LaTeX errors found: ! LaTeX Error: File `inconsolata.sty' not found. the Debian/Ubuntu solution is: sudo apt-get install texlive-fonts-extra

I have the libx11-dev package installed through the aptitude application. This is on 5.0 power pc. What can I provide to help with this? I don't know where to begin. -- Stephen Sefick Let's not spend our time and resources thinking about things that are so little or so large that all they really do for us is puff us up and make us feel like gods. We are mammals, and have not

am using ubuntu 9.10 and I am getting and x11 lib/headers not found. I have installed libx11-dev. I thought this would solve the problem, but it is not. Any help would be appreciated. kind regards, -- Stephen Sefick Let's not spend our time and resources thinking about things that are so little or so large that all they really do for us is puff us up and make us feel like gods. We are