similar to: [LLVMdev] Compiling via bitcode on Windows

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:57 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:52 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: >> / * snip */ > > Actually, rebuilding it makes "debug tblgen" fail with the errors at > the end of this email, and as such everything that depends on it, how > odd... > When I get back to that

I am writing an interprocedural compiler pass. Because the passneeds information from a FunctionPass, e.g., the post-dominance frontier (PDF), and because a ModulePass is not permitted to require a FunctionPass, I am forced to make my pass a FunctionPass and do majority of its work in the doFinalization() method. When I run "opt -mypass -verify -o code2.bc code1.bc" I get no

I have a compiler transform that I have been working on that produces bytecode that passes the verifier. However, when I try to read that bytecode back in, I get the assertion failure below. llvm::BytecodeReader::ParseConstantPoolValue(unsigned int): Assertion `(!isa<Constant>(Result) || !cast<Constant>(Result)->isNullValue()) || !hasImplicitNull(TypeID) &&

I followed what you said and called verifyModule() with the AbortProcessAction option. verifyModule() returns false, but does not abort and does not print out any information about what caused the verification to fail. Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: >> I am writing an interprocedural compiler pass. Because the passneeds >> information from a

I also tried iterating through the functions of the module and calling verifyFunction(), which also returns false, but does not cause an abort or report anything to stderr about what caused the verification to fail. From the doxygen for verifyFunction() and verifyModule(), it seems like they both should print information to stderr if the verification fails and should abort opt if

On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > I am writing an interprocedural compiler pass. Because the passneeds > information from a FunctionPass, e.g., the post-dominance frontier > (PDF), and because a ModulePass is not permitted to require a > FunctionPass, I am forced to make my pass a FunctionPass and do majority > of its work in the doFinalization() method. ok > When

Ryan, This looks like a bug. Could you file it, please? Reid. On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 19:47 -0600, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > I have a compiler transform that I have been working on that produces > bytecode that passes the verifier. However, when I try to read that > bytecode back in, I get the assertion failure below. > > llvm::BytecodeReader::ParseConstantPoolValue(unsigned

I am still diagnosing the cause of the assertion failure and will submit a bug when I better understand the problem. Reid Spencer wrote: > Ryan, > > This looks like a bug. Could you file it, please? > > Reid. > > On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 19:47 -0600, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > >>I have a compiler transform that I have been working on that produces >>bytecode

I think I misread the doxygen. verifyFunction & verifyModule return false if no errors are detected. However, my question now becomes why does the code produced by my transform pass verification, but it causes an assertion failure in the byte reader when it (the code produced by my transform) is passed to another invocation of opt? Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > I also tried iterating

Hi guys, I discovered xapian today and I'm trying it because it looks promising compared to other FTS engines. However I'm in a windows environment so it's a bit painful to set up as there is no official binaries. I've heard about http://www.flax.co.uk/xapian_binaries And I'm trying to build their latest release (1.2.8). After a few tries I manage to compile everything with

Well... that didn't take long. I'm not sure what you did, Reid, with Path.cpp, but it broke VC++: Bytecode.lib(ReaderWrappers.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "public: __thiscall llvm::sys::Path::Path(class std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> > const &)" (??0Path at sys@llvm@@QAE at

Is anyone else seeing a bootstrap failure on x86_64-apple-darwin15 in current trunk? [ 95%] Linking CXX executable ../../bin/llvm-objdump Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: "_xar_serialize", referenced from: DumpBitcodeSection(llvm::object::MachOObjectFile*, char const*, unsigned int, bool, bool, bool, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>,

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > Kevin Enderby added those symbol uses in r270491. It has a cmake > feature test, and all the uses of those symbols appear bracketed in > HAVE_LIBXAR, so I don't know what went wrong for you. The trigger for this build failure is the usage of -DLLVM_BUILD_EXTERNAL_COMPILER_RT:BOOL=ON. If I drop that

Kevin Enderby added those symbol uses in r270491. It has a cmake feature test, and all the uses of those symbols appear bracketed in HAVE_LIBXAR, so I don't know what went wrong for you. On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Jack Howarth via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Is anyone else seeing a bootstrap failure on x86_64-apple-darwin15 in > current trunk? > > [

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: >> Kevin Enderby added those symbol uses in r270491. It has a cmake >> feature test, and all the uses of those symbols appear bracketed in >> HAVE_LIBXAR, so I don't know what went wrong for you.

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Jack Howarth > <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: >>> Kevin Enderby added those symbol uses in r270491. It has a cmake >>> feature test, and

Hi, With the sid package jags (2.0.0-1) and r-base-core (2.11.0-1), I cannot install package rjags anymore (this used to work at some point; can't recall exactly at what R/JAGS versions): ---<--------------------cut here---------------start------------------->--- R> install.packages("rjags", configure.args="--with-jags-modules=/usr/lib/JAGS/modules-2.0.0")

In my code here https://github.com/DragonOsman/currency_converter , I used C++17 and managed to get it to work (though I'm only using std::map::insert_or_assign() from C++17). And I'm using Windows, so I shouldn't use LDFLAGS or CXXFLAGS as environment variables. I'll use them directly on the compiler command line instead. The libraries I need to link against are

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Jack Howarth > <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: >>> Jack, >>> >>> What version of CMake are you using? >>> >>>

Hi Jack, Just a guess here, this may be the bug Chris helped me out with in the use of the include file xar/xar.h which is not C++ safe. I needed to wrap my include via: #ifdef HAVE_LIBXAR extern "C" { #include <xar/xar.h> } #endif I think we may need some help from Chris to track this down. I’ll bug him in a bit to see if he can help us on this. Kev > On May 24, 2016, at