similar to: [LLVMdev] Using cl::ZeroOrMore more pervasively with the cl::opt class

After we upgraded to 1.2.12, we've been having issues with libvirt... it complains that our formerly valid guest definitions are now invalid: error: Failed to start domain XXXX error: internal error: Cannot instantiate filter due to unresolvable variables or unavailable list elements: DHCPSERVER We looked into this, and found that it's the XML validation that's failing: # xmllint

Hi Óscar, On 22/11/12 09:41, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Luba Tang <lubatang at gmail.com> writes: > >> We found `llvm-config --cxxflags' does not have -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti >> when using cmake to build LLVM. >> Does anyone know how to fix it? > > Using -fno-rtti and -fno-exceptions is an internal LLVM policy. There is > no reason to impose it on client

Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> writes: >> Using -fno-rtti and -fno-exceptions is an internal LLVM policy. There is >> no reason to impose it on client code. > > actually it does impact external code. For example dragonegg does > > #include "llvm/Support/PluginLoader.h" > > This file contains > > // This causes operator= above to be

On Jun 14, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Walter Landry wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I thought you might be interested in some C++ expression template > benchmarks I have done. > > http://www.wlandry.net/Projects/FTensor#Benchmarks > > Clang's performance was mixed. It optimized the expression template > code just as well as the code that unrolled the expressions by hand,

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > I don't think that Clang/LLVM uses it by default on x86_64. If you're using -Ofast, however, that would explain it. I recommend looking at -O3 vs -O0 and make sure those are the same. -Ofast enables -ffast-math, which can legitimately cause differences. > The following tests pass at "-O3" and

Duncan, What is the situation with -Ofast in dragonegg 3.4? Are we now enabling all of the same optimizations for that case as are done in clang when it is passed -Ofast? Thanks in advance for any clarification. Jack

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:53 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > On 02/22/2018 09:34 PM, Stepan Salenikovich wrote: > > Its unexpected because the decoder continues to output all samples > > of -32768 even when the microphone input is silence or near silence, so > > I would expect the decoded values to be at or near 0. > > Oh, if the output is

On 14 October 2016 at 15:50, Sebastian Pop <sebpop.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > These 3 tests are passing with the following configurations: > -O3 -ffp-contract=off > -O3 -ffp-contract=on > -O0 -ffp-contract=off > -O0 -ffp-contract=on > > They are not passing at: > -Ofast -ffp-contract=on > -Ofast -ffp-contract=off Let's separate completely FP-contract and

On Jun 15, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Douglas Gregor wrote: > On Jun 14, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Walter Landry wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> >> I thought you might be interested in some C++ expression template >> benchmarks I have done. >> >> http://www.wlandry.net/Projects/FTensor#Benchmarks >> >> Clang's performance was mixed. It optimized the

Hello Mailing List I got a severe network error message at a HP DL360 Server. The kernel log says: ----------------------------------- /var/log/messages ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mar 19 15:45:06 server kernel: do_IRQ: 2.168 No irq handler for vector (irq -1) Mar 19 15:45:17 server kernel: bnx2 0000:02:00.1: eth1: DEBUG: intr_sem[0] PCI_CMD[00100446] Mar 19

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org> >> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> >> Cc: "Sebastian Paul Pop" <s.pop at samsung.com>, "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "Matthias

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org> >> To: "Sebastian Pop" <sebpop.llvm at gmail.com> >> Cc: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "Sebastian Paul Pop" <s.pop at samsung.com>,

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 8:34 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > Hi Stepan, > > I would need more information to be able to investigate further. It's > legal for the decoder to output -32768, so it would be good if you could > explain how this is unexpected. Its unexpected because the decoder continues to output all samples of -32768 even when the

On 07/22/2013 11:58 PM, Star Tan wrote: > Hi Tobias, > > > I have attached a patch file to optimize string operations in Polly-Detect pass. > In this patch file, I put most of long string operations in the condition variable of "PollyViewMode" or in the DEBUG mode. OK. > From 448482106e8d815afa40e4ce8543ba3f6f0237f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Star Tan

Hi, I would like to provide a summary of the different proposals on how to fix the test-suite to make it succeed when specifying extra CFLAGS "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on". I would like to expose the issue and proposed ways to fix it to other potential reviewers that could provide extra feedback. We also need to decide which proposal (or combination of) to implement and

On 12 October 2016 at 14:26, Sebastian Pop <sebpop.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Correct me if I misunderstood: you would be ok changing the > reference output to exactly match the output of "-O0 -ffp-contract=off". No, that's not at all what I said. Matching identical outputs to FP tests makes no sense because there's *always* an error bar. The output of O0, O1, O2,

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Hal Finkel via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Sebastian Pop" <sebpop.llvm at gmail.com> > Cc: "Sebastian Paul Pop" <s.pop at samsung.com>, "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "Matthias Braun" > <matze at braunis.de>, "Clang Dev" <cfe-dev

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/symm, FP_ABSTOLERANCE=1e1 >> polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/gramschmidt, FP_ABSTOLERANCE=1e0 >> What should be a good relative tolerance to set for these two tests? > > What's the minimum relative tolerance that you need for them to pass? Setting

Hi, I would need some help to fix polybench/symm: void kernel_symm(int ni, int nj, DATA_TYPE alpha, DATA_TYPE beta, DATA_TYPE POLYBENCH_2D(C,NI,NJ,ni,nj), DATA_TYPE POLYBENCH_2D(A,NJ,NJ,nj,nj), DATA_TYPE POLYBENCH_2D(B,NI,NJ,ni,nj)) { int i, j, k; DATA_TYPE acc; /* C := alpha*A*B + beta*C, A is symetric */ for (i = 0; i < _PB_NI; i++) for (j = 0; j < _PB_NJ; j++) {

Is it possible to unroll a loop (forcibly if necessary) with llvm (possibly the -loop-unroll pass) a constant number of times. I believe that I read that the -unroll-count=x option was removed, correct? So is there some other way to do this or is this just not possible in llvm? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: