Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Assertion: replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type! being thrown all of a sudden"
2015 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] Assertion: replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type! being thrown all of a sudden
I forgot to mention this in my initial email.
The build of LLVM that I was using was commit a0d5d7aed8e177cea381b3d054d80c212ece9f2c
The date on the commit is: Date: Fri Sep 26 12:34:06 2014
Also:
Today I grabbed the ToT llvm/clang/clang-extra-tools and I’m working on getting my code to be compatible with it.
I can switch back and forth between the current ToT llvm and the old one.
Thanks,
2015 Jan 19
3
[LLVMdev] Assertion: replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type! being thrown all of a sudden
> On 2015-Jan-19, at 12:38, Frédéric Riss <friss at apple.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 19, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Christian Schafmeister <chris.schaf at verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I forgot to mention this in my initial email.
>>
>> The build of LLVM that I was using was commit a0d5d7aed8e177cea381b3d054d80c212ece9f2c
>> The date on the
2018 Nov 05
2
ORC JIT api, object files and stackmaps
Hi Christian
Your use case seems to have similar requirements as remote JITing in
ORC. So far I haven't used that part myself and I am sure Lang can tell
you much more about it. However, this comment on the
RemoteObjectClientLayer class sounds promising for your questions (1)
and (2):
/// Sending relocatable objects to the server (rather than fully relocated
/// bits) allows JIT'd code
2004 Sep 02
0
important tone up
ongemaklikdekion balantacguhj schlappner
If someone tells you our site o""ffers cheap FDA a""pproved med-icat,ions
with pre_scrip_tion, please don't just listen t_o them but t-o check our
site by yourself. The or-der that is sent t~o your door via fast and
reliable delivery service will prove.
eur.op_ean dr-u'gs & ne^xtday shipping
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking
2009 Jul 23
1
[PATCH server] changes required for fedora rawhide inclusion.
Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com>
---
AUTHORS | 17 ++++++
README | 10 +++
conf/ovirt-agent | 12 ++++
conf/ovirt-db-omatic | 12 ++++
conf/ovirt-host-browser | 12 ++++