similar to: [LLVMdev] Backend Tablegen Instruction Definition

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sebastian Pop" <spop at codeaurora.org> > To: "James H Cownie" <james.h.cownie at intel.com> > Cc: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "John Leidel (jleidel)" <jleidel at micron.com>, "LLVM Dev" > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at

Hi, On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Cownie, James H via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > It would be much more convenient for those of us who are in town for SC and staying downtown if we could find somewhere in walking range. (Which in my mind is 1 to 3/2 of a mile; others may have different criteria, but I find a 30 min walk refreshing after taking beer :-). > Agreed.

Hearing no opinions to the contrary, let's say Banger's 6pm (tomorrow). Address and web site below. I submitted online for a reservation early this morning, and I'll try to get an updated head count on Sunday morning. -Hal Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID On Nov 14, 2015 11:21 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: Did this ever get settled? On Fri,

Hi everyone, There seems to be a good level of interest in this; so we should settle on a time and location. It has been pointed out that previous socials were held at http://bbrovers.com/ - we seem to have a preference for the availability of alcoholic beverages, and otherwise no strong opinions have been expressed. Logistically, we should pick someplace likely to have flexibility regarding

Hi John, Thank you for the comments. I am addressing some of them bellow. Regards, Samuel 2014-08-11 9:36 GMT-04:00 John Leidel (jleidel) <jleidel at micron.com>: > Sergey [et.al], thanks for putting this proposal together. Overall, this > looks like a pretty solid approach to providing relatively hardware > agnostic omp target functionality. I had several comments/questions

I must not be asking clearly. I have a machine on which I have placed the tarballs - but no internet access. How do I use the *src.tar.gz files from the llvm 3.4 downloads page? I understand the layout produced by the svn actions, but if I have just the tarballs, do I simply replace "svn co" with "tar -xvzf" in the sequence? How do the names of the tarballs map to the names

Hello again, Because the LLVM in HPC workshop will be in Austin on Nov. 15th (http://llvm-hpc2-workshop.github.io/), we'll have an anomalously-high density of LLVM developers in Austin that day. I think it would be a great evening to have an LLVM social! I'm not familair with the Austin area, but I've cc'd some folks who are (or at least were) in Austin, so hopefully we can get

I am using the source distribution, and the first puzzle is that it doesn't seem to match with the installation instructions from svn. E.g., svn talks about llvm, cfe, compiler-rt, etc; however, the source is in many differently named *.tar.gz files: clang-3.4.src.tar.gz libcxx-3.4.src.tar.gz polly-3.4.src.tar.gz clang-tools-extra-3.4.src.tar.gz lld-3.4.src.tar.gz

All, we recently had a user report an issue associated with utilizing LLVM-MC as the desired assembler in place of GNU’s GAS. They are utilizing a tangled mess of automake scripts to build this respective software package and have decided to manually override the “CCAS” macro to point directly to LLVM-MC (rather than using Clang). Apparently, automake assumes that whatever “compiler” (as it is

Hi, everyone, The paper submission deadline for this year's LLVM in HPC workshop has been further extended to September 14th (AoE). We're looking for a few additional submissions, so if you have anything that could be submitted as a paper by the beginning of next week, please take advantage of this opportunity. If you have any questions, please let me know. SC20 is now a virtual

Hello everybody! I would like to present a proposal for implementation of OpenMP offloading in LLVM. It was created by a list of authors and covers the runtime part at most and at a very high level. I believe it will be good to have input from community at this early stage before moving deeper in details. The driver part is intentionally not touched, since we have no clear vision on how one can

I agree with David's sentiment. The second method appears to be easier to follow. IMHO, this would be easier for external users that desire to modify the backend for their own custom extensions/instructions. On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 5:05 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk > wrote: > On 18 Aug 2017, at 10:55, Alex Bradbury <asb at asbradbury.org> wrote: >

On 21 August 2017 at 11:53, Daniel Sanders <daniel_l_sanders at apple.com> wrote: > One thing to be aware of with this is that (IIRC) tablegen uses the pattern to infer things about the pattern. One example I vaguely remember is that an empty pattern would result in the same effect as hasSideEffects=1 and I think there were others. Thanks for the note - excellent point. Looking at

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alex Bradbury" <asb at asbradbury.org> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "LLVM Dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "flang-dev" <flang-dev at googlegroups.com>, "Rob Neely" <neely4 at llnl.gov>, > "douglas miles (PGI)" <douglas.miles at

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 01:10:50PM +0000, Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev wrote: > It's my understanding that llvm-mc is intended to be a testing tool > for LLVM developers rather than an assembler for end users. Users > should be assembling with clang. Not all LLVM users are clang users. For example, we're using LLVM to build OpenVMS cross-compilers to x86 for our porting effort.

Calling all Dallas/Fort Worth LLVM developers. Several of the local DFW-area developers have decided its time to start a local social event. This is our first go at it, so please be patient. Given the relative density of tech companies along the I-75 corridor, we plan to meet out in the burbs’. Details: When: Thursday March 24 @ 5:00PM CDT Where: The Lion & Crown Pub; 932 Garden Park Dr,

Hi everyone, Colleagues of mine at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), having seen the advantages of working closely with LLVM, have decided to toss their hat into the ring and would like to hire an LLVM-focused compiler engineer. I collaborate with LLNL regularly, and I'm excited that they're taking this step. I expect that a qualified applicant will find this position both

All, I'd like to resurrect the discussion on replacing libgomp with libiomp as the default OpenMP runtime library linked with -fopenmp. For reference, the previous discussion is accessible there: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140217/thread.html#99461 We are very close to getting *full* OpenMP 3.1 specification supported in clang (only one (!) clause is not