similar to: [LLVMdev] Inclusion of iostream affects devirtualization in release_35

Hello, disclaimer/ Apologies if this is the wrong llvm/clang mailing list; please, direct me to the right one if needed. /disclaimer I've been experiencing issues with incomplete type info when debugging code generated by clang 3.5.0 from the recent release_35 branch. Generally, the problem manifests itself as the inability to examine any std::string parameter to a function, in either gdb

I.e., I see this when I run `git fetch`: ``` $ git fetch -v llvm.org From http://llvm.org/git/llvm = [up to date] master -> llvm.org/master = [up to date] release_1 -> llvm.org/release_1 = [up to date] release_16 -> llvm.org/release_16 = [up to date] release_20 -> llvm.org/release_20 = [up to date] release_21 -> llvm.org/release_21 = [up to date]

> On 2016-Feb-05, at 15:22, James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote: > > That usually happens when someone deletes and then recreates an svn branch with the same name, as happened in r215001 and r215011. > It can be deleted now, if anyone wants to. ``` $ git push llvm.org :release_35 at 215010 fatal: unable to access 'http://llvm.org/git/llvm.git/': The requested

> > > > I'd also like to propose the inclusion of the recent ABI fixes to the Mips > > > > target but I'm not sure this is a good idea. I'm having difficulty sorting out the > > > > dependencies for these at the moment since they seem to depend on some > > > > of Eric Christopher's Subtarget/TargetMachine refactoring. It may also be a

Hi, I was wondering if there is a standard for R function description in XML (or any plain text) format. Rd files are the closest thing I found, but they do not describe the argument (or return value) types. The purpose would be to write a program to automate the creation of C# wrapper around any R function, but without the argument type Rd descriptions are useless. Any clues... thank you

On 09/09/2014 01:53 PM, Dan Liew wrote: >> It looks like LLVMConfigLibs was created in r112714 for local use in >> Makefile.rules. The only use outside Makefile.rules is now in >> cmake/modules/Makefile. Teaching cmake/modules/Makefile to do >> a direct invocation would be fine with me. > > Okay. Attached is a patch that does this. Does this work okay for you?

On 13 December 2014 at 16:50, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > Same here... ARMv7 is already up and tested, AArch64 is proving a bit > more complicated due to old libstdc++ on my box. I'm working on it. I'm seeing one error on AArch64's test-suite: SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/AArch64/aarch64_neon_intrinsics.c:154979:16: warning: implicit declaration of

Hi, I was wondering what the policy is for applying fixes to released branches. In particular I have fix that would be useful to have in LLVM 3.5. I recently found and fixed a bug [1] in the way CMake files are generated by the Autoconf/Makefile system and fixed this in r217484. I figured it would be more sensible to ask about this in a thread separate from [2] because this is a much more

I want to start using cmake+ninja instead of autoconf for configuring and building llvm from svn, but I have no idea how to map my existing list of autoconf flags to cmake. Here's how I run ./configure right now in the top directory: PREFIX=_some_prefix_dir_ \ ../llvm/configure \ --prefix=$PREFIX \ --libdir=$PREFIX/lib/llvm \ --sysconfdir=$PREFIX/etc \ --enable-shared \

Hi Anton, It seems that some release branches (e.g. release_30, release_35, and release_36) are missing from the Git mirror for libc++abi. May you help to fix the problem? Thanks. Sincerely, Logan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150201/68faf5d4/attachment.html>

Vitor Luis Menezes wrote: > Hello all, > > Our compilers class has been using LLVM, and a partner and I decided to > implement devirtualization of virtual C++ calls in LLVM as a class > project. We quickly realized that existing debug metadata generated by > Clang didn't give us enough info to (precisely) implement this, and as > such have already begun modifying Clang to

Hello all, Our compilers class has been using LLVM, and a partner and I decided to implement devirtualization of virtual C++ calls in LLVM as a class project. We quickly realized that existing debug metadata generated by Clang didn't give us enough info to (precisely) implement this, and as such have already begun modifying Clang to insert such metadata. However, for devirtualization we also

Does anyone know of any comprehensive literature (like a book, collection of articles, etc.) that walk thorugh example of ARIMA modeling with the ts package of R? Genarlly if you've just started to learn the R-language and are all week long with ARIMA, what is a fast-pace source that you would recommend (to a beginner) ? Thank you, Krasi

Hello, after many failed attempts to correctly write BinaryFiles file "R CMD check will warn about them unless they are listed (one filepath per line) in a file BinaryFiles at the top level of the package." - CRAN docs would somebody kindly provide an example of BinaryFiles file? thank you Theo -- View this message in context:

Hello, I'm trying to create a source package (on Win2k system). I followed the instructions from R-extns.pdf, installed ActivePerl and RTools with setting the DOS path to it. Then I did "Rcmd check" and had an error: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ C:\R\rw2001\bin>Rcmd check D:/prime7/SpnInstall/spectrino * checking for working latex ...latex: not found NO * using log directory

(Windows NT)(I think I did all the steps in the Install file right) and I got an R-1.0.0 make error which noone got yet. Please help! I looked in the Makefile but I don't see any quoted strings there. (I'm not good at make:-/) >pwd /WINNT/Profiles/krac/Desktop/R-1.0.0/src/gnuwin32 >make BUILD=MINGW32 mkdir -p ../../bin make -C ./fixed make[1]: Entering directory

I tried half a gig and that didn't work. I just want to know before I go buy a new machine. Gry

Hi all, I can't seem to get the simplest CMakeLists.txt file working from http://llvm.org/docs/CMake.html#embedding-llvm-in-your-project. Do any of the LLVM projects use `find_package(LLVM REQUIRED CONFIG)`? Should I just be using `llvm-config` directly? http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20884 David

On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Kenneth Uildriks wrote: > 3. The front-end, recognizing that scribbling on an instance's vtbl > pointer has undefined results, eliminated the loads of the vtbl > pointer and replaced them with @classvtbl.TestVirtual. This would > allow devirtualization within a function at least, but (I think) would > do less to allow analysis to spot

(cc list this time) Hi Teresa, Apologies if this has been discussed before but ... > The LTO visibility of a class is derived at compile time from the class’s symbol visibility. > Generally, only classes that are internal at the source level (e.g. declared in an anonymous namespace) receive hidden LTO visibility. > Compiling with -fvisibility=hidden tells the compiler that, unless