similar to: [LLVMdev] Heads up! Planning to remove old vector shuffle lowering this week...

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev at redking.me.uk> wrote: > On 24 Nov 2014, at 17:53, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'll be skimming the PRs to see if there are any really critical > regressions, but so far it looks pretty good. > > > > If you are actively disabling the new vector shuffling and have some PR

> On Jan 4, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev at redking.me.uk> wrote: > > > On 4 Jan 2015, at 23:30, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com <mailto:chandlerc at gmail.com>> wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev at redking.me.uk <mailto:llvm-dev at redking.me.uk>> wrote: >> On 24 Nov 2014, at 17:53,

After some adding some serious ninja-ry to the new shuffle lowering... On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com> wrote: > 2. none_useless_shuflle none > Instead of using a single move to materialize a zero extended constant > into a vector register, we explicitly zeroed a vector register and use a > shuffle. > ... this test case is fixed,

Greetings all, As you may have noticed, there is a new vector shuffle lowering path in the X86 backend. You can try it out with the '-x86-experimental-vector-shuffle-lowering' flag to llc, or '-mllvm -x86-experimental-vector-shuffle-lowering' to clang. Please test it out! There may be some correctness bugs, I'm still fuzz testing it to shake them out. But I expect fairly few

On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev at redking.me.uk> wrote: > On 20 Sep 2014, at 19:44, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > > If AVX is available I would expect the vpermilps/vpermilpd instruction > to be used for all float/double single vector shuffles, especially as it > can deal with the folded load case as well - this would

On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev at redking.me.uk> wrote: > Hi Andrea / Chandler / Quentin, > > If AVX is available I would expect the vpermilps/vpermilpd instruction to > be used for all float/double single vector shuffles, especially as it can > deal with the folded load case as well - this would avoid the integer/float > execution domain

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev at redking.me.uk> wrote: > If you don’t want to spend time on this, I’d be happy to create a > candidate patch for review? I’ve been unclear if you were taking patches > for your shuffle work prior to it becoming the default. While I'm happy to work on it, I'm even more happy to have patches. =D -------------- next

> On Sep 9, 2014, at 3:39 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > Awesome, thanks for all the information! > > See below: > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Andrea Di Biagio <andrea.dibiagio at gmail.com <mailto:andrea.dibiagio at gmail.com>> wrote: > You have already mentioned how the new shuffle lowering is missing > some

Hi Chandler, I have tested the new shuffle lowering on a AMD Jaguar cpu (which is AVX but not AVX2). On this particular target, there is a delay when output data from an execution unit is used as input to another execution unit of a different cluster. For example, There are 6 executions units which are divided into 3 execution clusters of Float(FPM,FPA), Vector Integer (MMXA,MMXB,IMM), and Store

Wow. Somehow, I forgot about vbroadcast and vpbroadcast. =[ Sorry about that. I'll fix those. On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Andrea Di Biagio <andrea.dibiagio at gmail.com > wrote: > Hi Chandler, > > Here is another test. > > When looking at the AVX codegen, I noticed that, when using the new > shuffle lowering, we no longer emit a single vbroadcastss in the case

The Aspire One is one of those netbooks that have become so popular recently. I've installed CentOS on the hard drive model, and have been considering doing a wiki article about it, and probably will unless there are strenuous objections. The objections might come from the fact that outside drivers are required for wireless, webcam, sound, and even wired ethernet. I have an article on my

Hi all, I have just received the following e-mail from an Asterisk user: "I just made a call via BT to a mobile. Then an incoming call came in and Ann else answered it - it made my call go completely fuzzy and I could hear what the woman on the other line was saying to Ann but I couldn't hear my conversation! When Ann's call finished - mine went even fuzzier and all I could hear

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Robert Lougher <rob.lougher at gmail.com> wrote: > Unfortunately, another team, while doing internal testing has seen the > new path generating illegal insertps masks. A sample here: > > vinsertps $256, %xmm0, %xmm13, %xmm4 # xmm4 = xmm0[0],xmm13[1,2,3] > vinsertps $256, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm6 # xmm6 = xmm1[0],xmm0[1,2,3] >

Hi Chandler, While doing the performance measurement on a Ivy Bridge, I ran into compile time errors. I saw a bunch of “cannot select" in the LLVM test suite with -march=core-avx-i. E.g., SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.isamax.c is failing at O3 -march=core-avx-i with: fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: 0x7f91b99a6420: v4i32 = bitcast 0x7f91b99b0e10 [ORD=3] [ID=27]

Hi all, Attached herewith is a fairly simple LLVM file (shuffle.ll) with lots of vector shuffles. When I use llc with -O3 -mcpu=core-avx2 the first shuffle sequence containing types of 128 wide gets reduced a single shuffle, where as the second shuffle sequence containing types of 256 wide doesn't get reduced to a single shuffle instruction in the resulting X86 code (Shuffle.s attached).

> On Sep 9, 2014, at 1:47 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com <mailto:qcolombet at apple.com>> wrote: > Hi Chandler, > > I had observed some improvements and regressions with the new lowering. > > Here are the numbers for an Ivy Bridge machine fixed at

I've run the SingleSource test suite for core-avx-i and have no failures here so a preprocessed file + commandline would be very useful if this reproduces for you still. On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm having trouble reproducing this. I'm trying to get LNT to actually > run, but manually compiling the given source

> On Sep 7, 2014, at 8:49 PM, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com> wrote: > > Sure, > > Here is the command line: > clang -cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-macosx -S -disable-free -disable-llvm-verifier -main-file-name tmp.i -mrelocation-model pic -pic-level 2 -mdisable-fp-elim -masm-verbose -munwind-tables -target-cpu core-avx-i -O3 -ferror-limit 19 -fmessage-length 114

Looks like ogg123 has a thinko in the shuffling code; the attached patch (against today's CVS snapshot) fixes the problem. Please CC any replies to me; I'm not on the list. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ <HR NOSHADE> <UL> <LI>X-unknown/X-unknown

On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > Awesome, thanks for all the information! > > See below: > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Andrea Di Biagio <andrea.dibiagio at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> You have already mentioned how the new shuffle lowering is missing >> some features; for example, you explicitly