similar to: [LLVMdev] Writing my own debugger... use __builtin_frame_address or is there something better?

Dear Contributors, I am asking help on the way how to solve a problem related to loops for that I always get confused with. I would like to perform the following procedure in a compact way. Consider that p is a matrix composed of 100 rows and three columns. I need to calculate the sum over some rows of each column separately, as follows: fa1<-(colSums(p[1:25,])) fa2<-(colSums(p[26:50,]))

Hello: I am doing forward stepwise analysis on the glm model. I am trying to use model operator in the "upper" scope formula, for example, scope=list(lower=~1,upper=~ .^2) but the upper bound of the scope seems to be ignored and add1 is not performed at all, while if the terms are explicitly listed in the formula, the step function seems to work

Dear Sir/Madam, Please allow me ask some things about share samba on CentOS 6.5 My case: data (excel file, linked file) of shared folder need security and not allow deleting except for owner and owning group, My testing configuration: + NTFS permision: chmod 3775 on shared folder, # chmod 3777 fa # ll total 8 drwxrwsrwt 2 fa1 fa 4096 Feb 2 12:41 fa + Samba permission:

Dear Sir/Madam, Please allow me ask some things about share samba on CentOS 6.5 My case: data (excel file, linked file) of shared folder need security and not allow deleting except for owner and owning group, My testing configuration: + NTFS permision: chmod 3775 on shared folder, # chmod 3777 fa # ll total 8 drwxrwsrwt 2 fa1 fa 4096 Feb 2 12:41 fa + Samba permission:

In thinking about this we could use a Mutex::tryacquire(...) (non-recursive), around JIT::runJITOnFunctionUnlocked(...)'s while loop, and use your JITEmitter:: getLazyFunctionStub(...) suggestion in place of forceEmitFunctionStub(...). Is the lock attempt too heavy, even if it is implemented with atomics? I'll implement this when I have time. Garrison On Feb 17, 2010, at 15:42, Garrison

Hi Olivier, Thanks for responding! I get to learn this way. On Feb 17, 2010, at 12:50, Olivier Meurant wrote: > Hi Garrison, > > I am not a specialist of the code but here is my 2 cents: > > - I like the idea that in lazy-mode the call (in module or not) is treated by a stub (like every calls). If we go further with this, I'll have to add test cases for lazy mode. I kind

Hola, Algo que me está pasando con esta función es lo siguiente: A "p1" lo tengo que reemplazar por "p1_integra_datos" y a "p10" por "p10_cuales_rep", pero como p10 contiene p1, y así pasa con otras preguntas (p2 y p20, por ejemplo), me los reemplaza en ambas, cuándo lo que busco es otra cosa. reglas$condicion_final <-

I am sure there is a simple way to do the following, but i haven't been able to find it. I am hoping a merciful soul on R-help could point me in the right direction. I am doing a factor analysis on survey data with missing values. to do this, I run: FA1<-factanal(na.omit(DATA), factors = X, rotation = 'oblimin', scores = 'regression') Now that I have my factors and

I have a very strange problem accessing some files on a samba share that are in use from many windows7 client machines. I'm experiencing long timeouts: 5-30 seconds per file on very small xml files. The share is accessed by contemporary Windows7 machines at the time they are shut down. It seems to me that some of the files remain opened and locked to all other clients at server side while the

Buenas, Se me hace raro que la función no admita un parámetro para eso. Una opción es hacerlo en dos pasos: P1: Reemplaza p10, p20, ... por algo como q10, q20, ... P2: Haz el reemplazo que quieres. Igualmente puedes hacer el reemplazo que haces y en un segundo paso reemplazar p10_integra_datos por p10_cuales_rep, ... Un saludo, Manuel. El jue, 09-03-2023 a las 10:20 -0300, juan manuel dias

I have sort of an emergency question for the list. One of my professors for an S-Plus intensive class distributed a function to produce partial regression plots. I need to run it under R, because I'm doing the homework on my home computer with a modem; hence I don't have the speed required to emulate X-Windows and run S Plus off one of the campus servers. Bottom line: I'm using R.

> > On 4 Jan 2015, at 16:44, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at britannica.bec.de> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 03:02:30PM +0000, John Smith wrote: >> "all I need is the ability to get the current variables off the current >> function... > > Finding the functions on the stack is easy. Finding which auto variables > are where is *much* harder. That

Hi you all guys/girls from this list, I almost never use email lists, but this problem is driving me crazy. I use shorewall for a long time ( since version 1.2.x) but now I use it where I work, and here we now have 4 different ISP for redundance and because it''s cheaper then 1 ISP and a bigger link. 3 of 4 ISP I have no problems, but on the 4th ISP here goes my problem : I have a

On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 13:22, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > The only way I can think of to reliably detect the direction is using > an __attribute__((noinline)) function to compare locals from two > different, nested frames (even that's iffy though on a semantic > level). If there turned out to be a compelling enough use-case, an > intrinsic could be

Hi Garrison, I am not a specialist of the code but here is my 2 cents: - I like the idea that in lazy-mode the call (in module or not) is treated by a stub (like every calls). - If the jit is in non-lazy mode, I'm not really fan of the "stub" solution. Is it not possible to use the same mechanism as it already exists : add the function to pending list and emit it after the current

The patch I recently attached to bug 2606, reproduced here, is my first attempt to solve this issue as represented by the attached test cases. To solve the foreign Module GlobalVariable problem, I modified JIT::getOrEmitGlobalVariable(...) to directly attempt to map a found "external" GlobalVariable. To solve the foreign Module Function problem, I modified both JIT.{h,cpp} and

On 10/10/13 22:01, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > On Oct 10, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Behan Webster <behanw at converseincode.com> wrote: > >> One of the issues the LLVMLinux project is having is with the use of >> named registers in the Linux kernel code. The kernel uses something like >> this in order to assign a C variable name to a register (one for each >> kernel

On 20/10/2013 16:22, Behan Webster wrote: > On 10/10/13 22:01, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: >> On Oct 10, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Behan Webster <behanw at converseincode.com> wrote: >> >>> One of the issues the LLVMLinux project is having is with the use of >>> named registers in the Linux kernel code. The kernel uses something like >>> this in order to

One of the issues the LLVMLinux project is having is with the use of named registers in the Linux kernel code. The kernel uses something like this in order to assign a C variable name to a register (one for each kernel arch). register unsigned long current_stack_pointer asm("esp"); clang doesn't allow this kind of thing which required a patch which less efficient: #define

On 11/05/13 00:20, Alp Toker wrote: > On 20/10/2013 16:22, Behan Webster wrote: >> On 10/10/13 22:01, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: >>> On Oct 10, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Behan Webster <behanw at converseincode.com> wrote: >>> >>>> One of the issues the LLVMLinux project is having is with the use of >>>> named registers in the Linux kernel code.