similar to: [LLVMdev] Tree conflict on checkout

Yes, llvm::InitializeAllTargetMCs(void) does seem to be autogenerated. It is _LLVMInitializeFooTargetMC that I can't find documented anywhere. On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Anton Korobeynikov < anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > This function is autogenerated. You need also to change top-level > configure / cmake files. > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Daniel

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On May 5, 2015, at 6:47 PM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > > Take a look at how debuggers have migrated through the years. They too >> >> used to have their own script format. Now most (all?) popular debuggers >> do scripting through embedding an actual programming

Is there documentation somewhere about exactly what the function is supposed to do, or do I have to figure it out from existing examples? On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Anton Korobeynikov < anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > You have to provide this function and initialize the whole MC > infrastructure. > > See e.g. lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMMCTargetDesc.cpp > >

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Will Newton <will.newton at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> > On May 5, 2015, at 6:47 PM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: >> > >>

[+Saleem] On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:31:04 PM Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > I am using CMake 3.1.2. > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> It looks like your command fails early in CMake TryCompile tests. Does >> (your version of) CMake supports using Clang on Windows at all? >>

Both arguments require a string. Sorry, I forgot to mention that. On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > Could you do something like `-mode={if,od}` and make the option required? > > -- Sean Silva > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Daniel Dilts via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> With the

I am attempting to build for bare-metal ARM. On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com> > wrote: > >> [+Saleem] >> >> >> On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:31:04 PM Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> >> wrote:

I need to correct myself. It is possible to cross compile it on Windows, but not using the provided build systems. On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > I asked about this same question in the past (month or three ago). It is > not possible to cross compile compiler-rt on Windows. If you want to cross > compile you should use the make

In attempting to add a backend I came across the documentation here: http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html The section on the build system seems to be out of date, or maybe I don't understand it. I copied the Sparc target to a directory (Foo for the example), added Foo to the subdirectories list in llvm\lib\Target\LLVMBuild.txt and to LLVM_ALL_TARGETS in llvm\CMakeLists.txt. I

> > > Linker scripts are worse than everything - except for the alternatives > that > > we know about. Any particular suggestions here? > > I very much care about the functionality provided by linker scripts (for > embedded systems and kernel work), but I do agree that most current > script formats are hard to use, debug, reason about, etc... I have > often

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com> wrote: > [+Saleem] > > > On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:31:04 PM Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am using CMake 3.1.2. >> >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> It looks like your

> On Aug 22, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com <mailto:beanz at apple.com>> wrote: > Starting a new thread to loop in cfe-dev and lldb-dev. For those not following along there has been a thread on llvm-dev about moving the minimum required Visual Studio version to

Has anyone built Compiler-RT on Windows? I am attempting to compile it for ARM, but I get errors from CMake. It appears to be trying to pass VC++ flags to Clang. I am using a version of Clang built from trunk. PS D:\llvm\arm_test\compiler-rt-build> cmake -G Ninja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang.exe -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++.exe -DCM AKE_RC_COMPILER=rc.exe -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=""

I'm developing something for an ARMv7-A system in big-endian mode. I'm trying to use clang as the compiler for it. Things have been going well so far, but I've hit a point where the generated code is depending on functions which are implemented in compiler-rt. Since I'm doing the building on an amd64 machine, the compiler-rt that I have only targets x86/amd64. So, I have three

2015-03-29 3:33 GMT-05:00 Ed Schouten <ed at 80386.nl>: > I am cross-compiling compiler-rt for my specific use-case. That said, > I'm cross-compiling from x86-64 to x86-64, but for a different ABI. > This is what I use: > > > https://github.com/NuxiNL/cloudlibc/wiki/Building-runtime-libraries#user-content-compiler-rt > > -DCMAKE_CROSSCOMPILING=True > > As

I was attempting to cross compile on Windows. I ended up having to find the list in the CMake build system (not very hard) and manually creating a makefile to compile them. Took maybe 2 hours total. On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Chao Yan <yanchao2012 at gmail.com> wrote: > > 2015-03-29 15:11 GMT-05:00 Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com>: > >> I need to correct

On 3/12/15 8:14 PM, Daniel Dilts wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Ahmed Bougacha > <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com <mailto:ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:44:02PM -0700, Daniel Dilts wrote: > >> Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some > >> supported target) to LLVM IR?

> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:44:02PM -0700, Daniel Dilts wrote: >> Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some >> supported target) to LLVM IR? If there isn't, does this seem like >> something that would be feasible? There's plenty of variations on the idea: Revgen/S2E, Fracture, Dagger (my own), libcpu, several closed-source ones used by

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Daniel Dilts via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > 2. Will LLD and LLDB be updated as necessary to support CodeView? > Rui is is looking at making LLD link codeview from object files into PDBs. Zachary Turner intends to add PDB reading support to LLDB. We already have a PDB implementation of DIContext in lib/DebugInfo that uses PDBs. The

I second the motion. All in favor? On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 1 April 2016 at 18:50, Richard Smith via cfe-dev > <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > * The name has been used by a kickstarter project, causing incalculable > > confusion[0] > > Neal Stephenson has poetic license to do