similar to: [LLVMdev] need help on llvm support for Chapel

Upgrade clang? I can't reproduce it with trunk. On 4 June 2015 at 14:48, Hui Zhang <wayne.huizhang at gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, I found this link, but what's the solution?? > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Rafael Espíndola > <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I think this is https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16846 >> >> On

I think this is https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16846 On Jun 4, 2015 12:04 PM, "Hui Zhang" <wayne.huizhang at gmail.com> wrote: > Is there any clue for this error ? > > Thanks > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Hui Zhang <wayne.huizhang at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm having this error and couldn't find a

Hello, I'm having this error and couldn't find a resolution from online, any help would be greatly appreciated: clang: /export/home/hzhang86/chapel/chapel-llvm36/chapel/third-party/llvm/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfUnit.cpp:839: void llvm::DwarfUnit::addType(llvm::DIE&, llvm::DIType, llvm::dwarf::Attribute): Assertion `Ty && "Trying to add a type that doesn't

Hello, Richard Thanks a lot ! On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:04 AM, RICHARD STUCKEY < richard.stuckey at virgin.net> wrote: > > Hi, Hui Zang, > > It helps to remember that at runtime a variable of a structure type has to > be allocated store, and to think about how that variable is laid out in > store. > > You must use createMemberType to create a DIType for *each*

Hello, Everyone I'm using llvm 3.6 DIBuilder module to build the debug information for Chapel language(the Chapel-llvm front end works fine). When I run the test program, I got these assertions failed: !718 Expected no forward declarations! !719 Expected no forward declarations! !720 Expected no forward declarations! !721 Expected no forward declarations! !722 All nodes should be resolved!

Hello, I'm using DIBuilder to create debugging information, I'm not clear about two things: [1] Could you help explain the meaning and the difference between"alignment" and "offset" of a type ? e.g class Actor{ int age; const char* name; } Besides, I found the denotation of createMemberType and createStructType both have "Member

> On Nov 3, 2015, at 5:00 PM, Hui Zhang <wayne.huizhang at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I found a weird thing in llvm 3.3: > > For exactly the same MDNode *space, if I cast it to DILocation loc(space) and call loc.getFileName(), or I cast it to DIScope sco(space) and call sco.getFilename(), the return value would be different ! Totally two different files

> On 2015-Jun-02, at 11:14, Hui Zhang <wayne.huizhang at gmail.com> wrote: > > Any ideas ？ > > Thanks > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Hui Zhang <wayne.huizhang at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having this assertion fail when I was using DIBuilder to create the debug information: > > Expected no forward declarations! > !719 >

Hello, I found some source code using llvm 2.5 that has a call to Module::getTypeName(Type*), which I can't find it anymore in llvm newer than 3.3, so how can I get the name of a type(e.g a user-defined structure) if we have Type* of that ? Besides, I checked that old llvm maintains a TypeSymbolTable that enabled type name look-up, so what's the replacement and mechanism of it in the

Hello, I'm a little confused by the definition of metadata node: does it have to contain different types of data ? And does a named metadata have to have a string name ? I know the named metadata can only contain metadatas e.g. !3=metadata !{metadata !1, metadata !2} Does it belong to NamedMDNode or MDNode ? Thanks! -- Best regards Hui Zhang -------------- next part -------------- An

Hello, I'm having this assertion fail when I was using DIBuilder to create the debug information: Expected no forward declarations! !719 The assertion condition is: !isa<MDNodeFwdDecl> (MD) So My questions are: 1. What is exactly the MDNodeFwdDecl ? I saw it's in the latest release 3.6.1, but I also found this link

Hello, For some reason, I have to stick on llvm 3.3 for a language compiler, I find that the location debug info is attached to each instruction using !dbg, however, I found some of that information is mis-attched and need to be changed, so I want to *know what functions(I checked all funcs in DIBuilder.h but didn't find a appropriate one) are used to attach those !dbg nodes to each

Hello, I'm a little confused about the 3th and 4th arguments in the registration function, explained here: http://llvm.org/releases/3.3/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html e.g static RegisterPass<Hello> X("hello", "Hello World Pass", false /* Only looks at CFG */, false /* Analysis Pass */); "Lastly, we

Hello, Do you know where I can find the correct metadata layout in the source code package (which file)? I found a source code that used llvm 2.5 following a slightly different metadata layout as what I read on http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html#debugger-intrinsic-functions, which should be compatible with the latest 3.6 version, so where can I check the detailed difference in each

Hello, I found a function call Function::isDeclaration() in llvm 2.5 (I know that's ancient...), which is useful to me, but I can't find it in the later version 3.3, nor the latest 3.7.....Therefore, is there an alternative way to check whether the function is just a declaration or a definition ? PS: I read the source code of llvm 2.5, and found isDeclaration is simply to check if the

Hello, I'm using llvm 2.5. I initially built it with GCC 4.1.2 and it completed building. But when I run it with a simple test function, it fails with the following issue: Value still in symbol table! Type = 'i32' Name = 'a' Value still in symbol table! Type = 'i32' Name = 'b' llc: ValueSymbolTable.cpp:29: llvm::ValueSymbolTable::~ValueSymbolTable():

On 09/25/2017 02:53 PM, Matthias Braun via llvm-dev wrote: > The dump methods can be included in the release builds anyway by > enabling LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP. Is there a way to pass LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP into cmake from outside without changing any of the configuration files? With Chapel's use of LLVM, we try to avoid modifying any of the source files that come from the LLVM

> On Sep 25, 2017, at 6:03 PM, David Keaton via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 09/25/2017 02:53 PM, Matthias Braun via llvm-dev wrote: >> The dump methods can be included in the release builds anyway by enabling LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP. > > Is there a way to pass LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP into cmake from outside without changing any of the configuration files?

Hello, I'm trying to use clang++ instead of nvcc to build lulesh 2.0 cuda version. And it fails in the compilation with errors like the one below: opt/common/cuda/cuda-7.5.18/include/thrust/iterator/iterator_adaptor.h:187:5: error: expected member name or ';' after declaration specifiers __thrust_exec_check_disable__ ​It looks like clang++ is complaining about the thrust library

> ​It looks like clang++ is complaining about the thrust library comes with cuda, The Thrust library that comes with CUDA is indeed not compatible with clang. We made a number of changes to Thrust to make it work with clang (it was relying on what we considered to be bugs in nvcc), but they're only available in the upstream Thrust: https://github.com/thrust/thrust. No promises that one