similar to: [LLVMdev] Conditions that cause Clang refuse inlining a function

Hi Anton, Thanks for the answer. The link you provided doesn't answer the question. It lists the ways to overcome the linking error if the inline was not successful. The only condition that is found there to make the compiler not inline is "when compiling without optimization". I asked the question in the forum because I think that this info is not documented and most chances that

Duncan: I am only superficially familiar with LLVM structure. What I am trying to find out is if functions that have a single invocation are still found in the code during the compilation. In Open64 and other compilers, there is an early inlining pass that inlines all procedures that have a single invocation site. The reasoning is that if there is a single call to a procedure, then there is not

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Johan Engelen <jbc.engelen at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Perhaps LLVM_ATTRIBUTE_ALWAYS_INLINE could be defined to "inline" if the > > compiler has no support for always_inline (currently it is set to > nothing in > > that

I am writing a program in which I would like to take in a formula, change the response (Y) variable into something else, and then pass the formula, with the new Y variable to another function. That is, I am starting with formula <- Y~X1+X2+X3 and I'd like to do something like Y <- formula$Y newY <- f(Y) lm(newY~X1+X2+X3) So far, it seems that my

Hi Jim, I have tried "-fno-builtin" but it didn't help. Thanks, David On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > "-fno-builtin” is probably what you want. > > -Jim > > On Aug 4, 2014, at 2:19 AM, David Sela <sela.david at gmail.com> wrote: > > Clang optimizes code by replacing some parts

Hi, I'm working on a tool (KLEE) that interprets LLVM bitcode. One of the things it does is it instruments the LLVM bitcode with checks for division by zero. It does this by injecting calls to a function "klee_div_zero_check(long long divisor)" just before every division instruction (e.g. SDiv). These checks are injected by a pass that has been implemented in KLEE. This

I am trying to estimate models with subsets using the NLME package. However, I am getting an error in the case below (among others): > subset <- c(rep(TRUE, 107), FALSE) > fm2 <- lme(distance ~ age + Sex, data = Orthodont, random = ~ 1, subset=subset) Error in xj[i] : invalid subscript type 'closure' > fm2 <- lme(distance ~ age + Sex, data = Orthodont, random = ~ 1,

I am having the same problem as one Rebecca Sela(see bellow). On 21/12/2007 12:07 AM, Rebecca Sela wrote: >* I am trying to optimize a likelihood function using NLMINB. After running without a problem for quite a few iterations (enough that my intermediate output extends further than I can scroll back), it tries a vector of parameter values NaN. This has happened with multiple Monte Carlo

Hi, There is a problem with the handling of alwaysinline functions in Clang: they are not always inlined. AFAIK, this may only happen when the caller is in the dead code, but then we don't always successfully remove all dead code. Because of this, we may end up emitting an undefined reference for an "inline __attribute__((always_inline))" function. Libc++ relies on the compiler

Clang optimizes code by replacing some parts with efficient library functions. For example the following code: for (i=0;i<size;++i) dest[i]=src[i]; will be compiled to (target=ARM assembly): bl __aeabi_memcpy(PLT) The compile cmd: /usr/share/android-arm-l14-toolchain/bin/clang31 -cc1 -triple arm-none-linux-androideabi -S -target-abi aapcs-linux -target-cpu arm1022e

I am creating an R package. I ran R CMD check on the package, and everything passed until it tried to run the examples. Then, the result was: * checking examples ... ERROR Running examples in REEMtree-Ex.R failed. The error most likely occurred in: > ### * AutoCorrelationLRtest > > flush(stderr()); flush(stdout()) > > ### Name: AutoCorrelationLRtest > ### Title: Test for

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 7:17 PM, John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> wrote: > > On Aug 20, 2015, at 5:19 PM, Evgenii Stepanov via cfe-dev < > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There is a problem with the handling of alwaysinline functions in > > Clang: they are not always inlined. AFAIK, this may only happen when > > the caller is

I am in the process of submitting a package to CRAN. R CMD check ran successfully on the package on my local computer, using R version 2.1.1. However, on the computers for CRAN (with version 2.10.0), the following errors occurred: Warning in parse_Rd("./man/predict.Rd", encoding = "unknown") : ./man/predict.Rd:28: unknown macro '\dquote' *** error on file

Hi everyone, clang currently implements the 'flatten' function attribute by marking all calls to not 'noinline' functions with 'always_inline'. In effect, only the first level of calls is inlined, not all calls recursively (like gcc does). We briefly discussed possible solutions on IRC: We could add an equivalent LLVM attribute for functions (e.g. 'flatten'). The

Hi, I have an existing OVS bridge, that I can see in ovs-vsctl and use for other purposes. I've edited the machine's XML as instructed in http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/howto/libvirt/ When I try to start the VM, i get error: Cannot get interface MTU on 'ovsbr': No such device Any ideas? (Note: I can't see the ovs switch in brctl show or any other regular kernel tool,

Here is a proposal that I mentioned sometime ago. Any thoughts,comments or suggestions on this proposal would be appreciated. - Devang // = = =---------------------------------------------------------------------- ===// // Function Notes (or Traits) // = = =---------------------------------------------------------------------- ===// This document describes the

Branching off from a discussion of improvements to DIGlobalVariable representations that Adrian's working on - got me thinking about related changes that have already been made to DISubprogram. To reduce duplicate debug info when things like linkonce_odr functions were deduplicated in LTO linking, the relationship between a CU and DISubprogram was inverted (instead of a CU maintaining a list

LLVM (2.7 release version) provides 2 implementations for inlining function callsites: - InlineSimple.cpp (-inline): inline simple callsites according to its cost analysis - InlineAlways.cpp (-always-inline): inline all callsites that are marked with "always_inline" attribute. They are both subclasses of Inline.cpp that assumes the function's definition (body) is

Thank you so much David! After thinking a bit more I agree with you that attempting to add 'target-features' to my functions seem to be the safest approach of all. I noticed that if I mark the clang++ function as 'AlwaysInline', the inlining is performed normally. Is this a potential bug, given what you said that LLVM may accidentally move code using advanced cpu features outside

Hi Evgenii, I have one question about this (planned) change: what if a function is not inlined? The linker will not ODR merge them with this change, which isn’t great. What makes “internal” linkage more desirable than "linkonce_odr + visibility hidden"? — Mehdi > On Jul 12, 2016, at 6:16 PM, Evgenii Stepanov via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi,