similar to: [LLVMdev] HELP! PLEASE!

hey, so I'm writing in cpp. the documentation says that TheModule -> getDataLayout should return const DataLayout, but instead it is returning std::string. I require it to return DataLayout, as I generalize my function pass manager to accept the DataLayout constant as an argument, it being the only thing in common amongst both the ExecutionEngine and the Module class. Any pointers to

I am trying to parse LLVM IR from a bit code file. I went through the following steps. hello.cpp #include <iostream> int main() { std::cout << "Hello world!" << "\n"; return 0;} dump.cpp #include <llvm/IR/Module.h>#include <llvm/IRReader/IRReader.h>#include <llvm/IR/LLVMContext.h>#include <llvm/Support/SourceMgr.h> using

On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 10:02 -0400, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > > - at 5 = internal global [10 x i8] c"\22\D0\12\F4!\00\15\F9\EC\E1" > - at 6 = internal global [10 x i8] c"\D0\19\FB+\FD\F8#\03\E2\11" > + at 5 = internal global [10 x i8] c"\22Ð\12ô!\00\15ùìá" > + at 6 = internal global [10 x i8] c"Ð\19û+ýø#\03â\11" > > The diff

I'm using the LLVM C++ API to create code on-the-fly for execution. This works fine. But what if I want to save this code to disk, quit, relaunch my app at some later time, reload the previously generated code off disk, and execute it? How can I do that? Can somebody point me to some documentation or examples? Thanks. - Paul

hi how can i write IRinstruction on a file.txt? when i use  {for(inst_iterator I = inst_begin(F), E = inst_end(F); I != E; ++I,count++)  IRcodefile << std::basic_ostream(*I) <<"\n" } i get  error. is there any way that i can write it on file? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

i'm afraid this question is extremely basic, but i've assumed that dumping a .bc file from a module was a trivial operation, but now, first time i have to actually do it from code, for the life of me i can't find one missing step in the process: static void WriteModule ( const Module * M, BitstreamWriter & Stream )

Hi, I'm trying to inline function defined in another bitcode module via bitcode modification. I'm linking multiple bitcode modules, setting inline related attributes, applying -always-inline pass, but then debug info error occurs. It seems debug info metadata isn't properly updated on inlining. How can I fix it? I'm using LLVM 3.8.1 on OS X (On below example target is Android but

On 07/14/2013 08:05 AM, Star Tan wrote: > I have found that the extremely expensive compile-time overhead comes from the string buffer operation for "INVALID" MACRO in the polly-detect pass. > Attached is a hack patch file that simply remove the string buffer operation. This patch file can significantly reduce compile-time overhead when compiling big source code. For example, for

When I try to print out a instruction by the following way, I am getting the error message below. Anyone knows what's the problem? Instruction* inst; ... inst-print(cerr); testbuild.cpp:178: error: no matching function for call to 'llvm::Instruction::print(llvm::OStream&)' /x/pchsu/llvm/llvm-2.4/include/llvm/Value.h:83: note: candidates are: void

Every inlinable call in a function that has debug info (F->getSubprogram() returns non-null) must have a DebugLoc associated with it that has a scope chain that ends in that same DISubprogram. https://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html discusses some of the debug info IR metadata in LLVM. On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 1:03 AM Ku Nanashi via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Every inlinable call in a function that has debug info (F->getSubprogram() returns non-null) must have a DebugLoc associated with it that has a scope chain that ends in that same DISubprogram. Thank you for the comment! I don't know if this is a proper way to fix, but after I add DebugLoc same as inserting position instruction, no error occurs.

hi there, trying to follow the steps of Yan & Rossini 2003, I have two problems : first when I 'make CrossCompileBuild', I get : ****************************************************************************** make[1]: Entering directory `/home/ros/RWORK/CROSSSOMP/WinR/R-1.8.0/src/gnuwin32' make -f Makefile.docfiles make[2]: Entering directory

Dear all, Consider there is a program that writes to stdout using two different raw_fd_ostream-s: #include "llvm/LLVMContext.h" #include "llvm/Module.h" #include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h" using namespace llvm; int main() { raw_fd_ostream S(STDOUT_FILENO, false); outs() << "Hello"; S << ", world!";

Dear Users Regarding the NADA package, would anyone be able to help me understand what values are actually plotted on the Y axis of the plot obtained by using the *ros* function on the data and plotting the result with the plot() function? The Y axis is labeled "Values". According to the NADA user manual, ros performs a log transformation of the data by default, but the user can specify

I'm using createPrintModulePass to produce the IR of a created Module. I'm wondering if there is some way to insert/attach comments to the generated output. That is, prior to a given command, or block, emit a comment. I see the ability to add meta/debug data. Could that somehow be used to get comments into the generated IR? Or is there some other mechanism? I want to do this to help me

Hi all, In a pass I’m using raw_fd_ostream to write a string to a file. Does raw_fd_ostream guarantee the write is atomic when I do parallel compilation (currently I’m using -j8)? I have some errs() to print information for debugging purposes and I saw that the printed information gets messed up sometime. If I’m writing a string with the format of “A:B:C”, is it possible that I got “A1:B2:C1” and

Hello, The following describes an API change on trunk. The change is not in the 2.6 branch. The raw_fd_ostream class now defaults to overwriting its output file, and the F_Force flag which was introduced only recently is gone. There's a new F_Excl flag to support users wanting the behavior of returning an error if the file exists, though no one actually appears to want this.

Note that raw_fd_ostream is not seekable, and hence will not be suitable as addPassesToEmitFile output stream. 2016-02-22 18:27 GMT+02:00 Rafael Espíndola <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > On 22 February 2016 at 11:16, Frank Winter <fwinter at jlab.org> wrote: > > TargetMachine::CGFT_AssemblyFile is exactly what I am trying to write > out. > > I see. > > For

On Aug 25, 2009, at 1:04 AM, Albert Graef wrote: > . For many applications > other than LLVM itself, the basic LLVM <=2.5 interface which just > overwrites existing files is all that's ever needed. On LLVM trunk, raw_fd_ostream is now back to overwriting files by default, as it is the unanimous preference among in-tree users (and out-of-tree users that I'm aware of). Dan

I need to make nonlinear regression with the posterior script, but how is the problem? I have error in library (nls), package 'nls' has been merged into 'stats'. I need help? What other forms I have to make nonlinear regression? and how I find to calculate statistics y residuals, scatterplot. thanks SCRIPT ros<-read.table("Dataset.csv",header=T,sep=",")