Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] [3.5 Release] Release Candidate 3 Now Available - CMake build error"
2014 Jun 30
2
[LLVMdev] LLD dynamic compilation
Folks,
I'm having a look at LLD and I need some guidance...
I know it's not production ready for x86 and ARM (the idea is to make
it so). My steps:
I've added it to tools/lld and ran CMake again (on x86_64) on a
standard release build (static linking). It works, builds but I see
one unit test error:
Note: Google Test filter = InputGraphTest.Observer
[==========] Running 1 test from
2014 Jul 16
5
[LLVMdev] Fixing LLVM's CMake interface before LLVM3.5 release
Hi All,
I've been playing [1] with the newly introduced CMake interface for
using exported LLVM CMake targets (e.g. the LLVMSupport library) in
CMake projects and although it works there are a few things I think we
should fix before the LLVM 3.5 release.
Here are the current issues I see that I'd like to discuss.
Just to clarify by "Targets" I mean targets in the CMake sense
2014 Jul 18
2
[LLVMdev] Fixing LLVM's CMake interface before LLVM3.5 release
>> I am happy to start writing a patch for the documentation
>
> Thanks. Please Cc me for review.
Will do.
>> # LLVM_BUILD_* values available only from LLVM build tree.
>
> Those were created to simplify building Clang locally against a
> LLVM build tree. Clang needs the LLVM source and build trees too,
> so this gives it that information. No information is
2015 Feb 07
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] Representation of lld::Reference with a fake target
We are modeling target specific functionally using references, Doesn't your idea defeat the purpose of the atom model? Atoms are mostly target neutral and yaml/native format represents just an atom. Having a derived class for atoms will have a impact on the testing method with lld IMO.
We could continue to model using references in my opinion and add some meta data information in the atom
2015 Jan 21
2
[LLVMdev] Can we establish layering for the LLD libraries? Current state is a bit of a mess...
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2015, at 6:33 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I wanted to go through and map out the layering of LLD's libraries today
> and found that it's essentially impossible. I think some serious cleanup is
> needed here.
> >
> >
2015 Jan 21
2
[LLVMdev] Can we establish layering for the LLD libraries? Current state is a bit of a mess...
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 19, 2015, at 6:33 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
>>>
2020 Apr 23
3
Cannot build master
I am nuilding that now.
CC=clang CXX=clang++ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$HOME/opt/llvm11-git \
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \
-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON \
-DLLVM_ENABLE_EH=ON \
-DLLVM_ENABLE_RTTI=ON \
-DLLVM_HOST_TRIPLE=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu \
-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="AMDGPU;MSP430;WebAssembly;X86" \
2017 Aug 03
2
fatal error: clang/Basic/Version.inc: No such file or directory
Hi,
I try to build lldb with Cmake (gcc-5.3.0 is necessary for CUDA)
on my "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12.2 (x86_64)". Unfortunately
the build process breaks for lldb with the below mentioned error
message. I've downloaded the following packages and configured
with the following commands.
svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk llvm
cd llvm/tools
svn co
2016 Dec 19
1
How to create Debian packages for release 3.9.0
Hello,
Le 12/12/2016 à 18:29, Hans Wennborg a écrit :
> +Sylvestre who knows about these things.
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Kris van Rens via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> L.S.,
>>
>> I'm currently in the process of creating Debian packages for
>> clang/llvm release 3.9.0. For this I'm using the steps as explained on
2020 Apr 23
2
Cannot build master
Do you really need to build the C library for MLIR?
If so, it looks like it's just a missing dependency - MPFR library. Or if
you do have that library available, it's missing expected features.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 12:29 PM Luke A. Guest via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Here's the error:
>
> [1921/7570] /usr/lib/llvm/10/bin/clang++
2013 Jan 03
4
[LLVMdev] Fatal error in build, include <utility> not found
I'm trying to customize llvm by adding a header file of my own and tweaking
things accordingly.
While building, things go well until a certain point where it stops seeing
the includes of my file.
I'm working on Ubuntu 12.04 with llvm-3.1 on a custom target (mips-like),
gcc-4.6 and clang-3.2 (i've tried 3.1 too).
>From what i've understood, when it builds the first binaries of
2012 Jun 03
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] r157890 - /cfe/trunk/unittests/Tooling/ToolingTest.cpp
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 08:15:09 +0900
NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote:
> 012/6/3 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>:
> >> Author: chapuni
> >> Date: Sat Jun 2 10:34:26 2012
> >> New Revision: 157890
> >>
> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=157890&view=rev
> >> Log:
> >> Revert r157819,
2012 Jun 03
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] r157890 - /cfe/trunk/unittests/Tooling/ToolingTest.cpp
012/6/3 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>:
>> Author: chapuni
>> Date: Sat Jun 2 10:34:26 2012
>> New Revision: 157890
>>
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=157890&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Revert r157819, "#ifdef out a broken test on win32"
>>
>> FYI, LLVM_ON_WIN32 is useless.
>
> Can you be more specific? I
2017 Feb 11
2
Asan self host problems: Failed to deallocate
Trying to run a self host "ninja check-clang" with ASan enabled I hit a
/lot/ of errors like this (strangely I hit none of these in check-llvm,
only in check-clang):
Any ideas?
==10525==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to deallocate 0x10800 (67584) bytes
at address 0x631000014800
==10525==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed:
2017 Feb 15
2
Asan self host problems: Failed to deallocate
I wish there was something like the line in config.log that would show the
CMake command, but instead I can at least show you the CMakeCache files for
my release build and asan build (attached to this email).
No lld, so far as I know - believe I'm using gold at the moment for both
builds.
Did just reproduce this with a clean release build and a clean asanified
build from that. Same errors. I
2013 Jan 03
0
[LLVMdev] Fatal error in build, include <utility> not found
Hi Andrew, I suggest you do a verbose build (make VERBOSE=1) in order to see
exactly which command is being used to compile that file.
Ciao, Duncan.
On 03/01/13 14:50, APaschos wrote:
> I'm trying to customize llvm by adding a header file of my own and tweaking
> things accordingly.
> While building, things go well until a certain point where it stops seeing
> the includes of my
2019 Apr 30
6
Disk space and RAM requirements in docs
Hi,
Have anybody recently built LLVM in Debug mode /within/ space
requirements from the Getting Started doc?
https://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#hardware
> An LLVM-only build will need about 1-3 GB of space. A full build of
LLVM and Clang will need around 15-20 GB of disk space.
From my experience this numbers looks drastically low. On FreeBSD my
recent builds consumed more than