similar to: [LLVMdev] [3.5 Release] Release Candidate 3 Now Available - CMake build error

Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] [3.5 Release] Release Candidate 3 Now Available - CMake build error"

2014 Jun 30
2
[LLVMdev] LLD dynamic compilation
Folks, I'm having a look at LLD and I need some guidance... I know it's not production ready for x86 and ARM (the idea is to make it so). My steps: I've added it to tools/lld and ran CMake again (on x86_64) on a standard release build (static linking). It works, builds but I see one unit test error: Note: Google Test filter = InputGraphTest.Observer [==========] Running 1 test from
2014 Jul 16
5
[LLVMdev] Fixing LLVM's CMake interface before LLVM3.5 release
Hi All, I've been playing [1] with the newly introduced CMake interface for using exported LLVM CMake targets (e.g. the LLVMSupport library) in CMake projects and although it works there are a few things I think we should fix before the LLVM 3.5 release. Here are the current issues I see that I'd like to discuss. Just to clarify by "Targets" I mean targets in the CMake sense
2014 Jul 18
2
[LLVMdev] Fixing LLVM's CMake interface before LLVM3.5 release
>> I am happy to start writing a patch for the documentation > > Thanks. Please Cc me for review. Will do. >> # LLVM_BUILD_* values available only from LLVM build tree. > > Those were created to simplify building Clang locally against a > LLVM build tree. Clang needs the LLVM source and build trees too, > so this gives it that information. No information is
2015 Feb 07
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] Representation of lld::Reference with a fake target
We are modeling target specific functionally using references, Doesn't your idea defeat the purpose of the atom model? Atoms are mostly target neutral and yaml/native format represents just an atom. Having a derived class for atoms will have a impact on the testing method with lld IMO. We could continue to model using references in my opinion and add some meta data information in the atom
2015 Jan 21
2
[LLVMdev] Can we establish layering for the LLD libraries? Current state is a bit of a mess...
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > On Jan 19, 2015, at 6:33 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> > wrote: > > > I wanted to go through and map out the layering of LLD's libraries today > and found that it's essentially impossible. I think some serious cleanup is > needed here. > > > >
2015 Jan 21
2
[LLVMdev] Can we establish layering for the LLD libraries? Current state is a bit of a mess...
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> On Jan 19, 2015, at 6:33 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> >>>
2020 Apr 23
3
Cannot build master
I am nuilding that now. CC=clang CXX=clang++ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$HOME/opt/llvm11-git \ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \ -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON \ -DLLVM_ENABLE_EH=ON \ -DLLVM_ENABLE_RTTI=ON \ -DLLVM_HOST_TRIPLE=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu \ -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="AMDGPU;MSP430;WebAssembly;X86" \
2017 Aug 03
2
fatal error: clang/Basic/Version.inc: No such file or directory
Hi, I try to build lldb with Cmake (gcc-5.3.0 is necessary for CUDA) on my "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12.2 (x86_64)". Unfortunately the build process breaks for lldb with the below mentioned error message. I've downloaded the following packages and configured with the following commands. svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk llvm cd llvm/tools svn co
2016 Dec 19
1
How to create Debian packages for release 3.9.0
Hello, Le 12/12/2016 à 18:29, Hans Wennborg a écrit : > +Sylvestre who knows about these things. > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Kris van Rens via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> L.S., >> >> I'm currently in the process of creating Debian packages for >> clang/llvm release 3.9.0. For this I'm using the steps as explained on
2020 Apr 23
2
Cannot build master
Do you really need to build the C library for MLIR? If so, it looks like it's just a missing dependency - MPFR library. Or if you do have that library available, it's missing expected features. On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 12:29 PM Luke A. Guest via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Here's the error: > > [1921/7570] /usr/lib/llvm/10/bin/clang++
2013 Jan 03
4
[LLVMdev] Fatal error in build, include <utility> not found
I'm trying to customize llvm by adding a header file of my own and tweaking things accordingly. While building, things go well until a certain point where it stops seeing the includes of my file. I'm working on Ubuntu 12.04 with llvm-3.1 on a custom target (mips-like), gcc-4.6 and clang-3.2 (i've tried 3.1 too). >From what i've understood, when it builds the first binaries of
2012 Jun 03
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] r157890 - /cfe/trunk/unittests/Tooling/ToolingTest.cpp
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 08:15:09 +0900 NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote: > 012/6/3 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>: > >> Author: chapuni > >> Date: Sat Jun  2 10:34:26 2012 > >> New Revision: 157890 > >> > >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=157890&view=rev > >> Log: > >> Revert r157819,
2012 Jun 03
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] r157890 - /cfe/trunk/unittests/Tooling/ToolingTest.cpp
012/6/3 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>: >> Author: chapuni >> Date: Sat Jun  2 10:34:26 2012 >> New Revision: 157890 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=157890&view=rev >> Log: >> Revert r157819, "#ifdef out a broken test on win32" >> >> FYI, LLVM_ON_WIN32 is useless. > > Can you be more specific? I
2017 Feb 11
2
Asan self host problems: Failed to deallocate
Trying to run a self host "ninja check-clang" with ASan enabled I hit a /lot/ of errors like this (strangely I hit none of these in check-llvm, only in check-clang): Any ideas? ==10525==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to deallocate 0x10800 (67584) bytes at address 0x631000014800 ==10525==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed:
2017 Feb 15
2
Asan self host problems: Failed to deallocate
I wish there was something like the line in config.log that would show the CMake command, but instead I can at least show you the CMakeCache files for my release build and asan build (attached to this email). No lld, so far as I know - believe I'm using gold at the moment for both builds. Did just reproduce this with a clean release build and a clean asanified build from that. Same errors. I
2013 Jan 03
0
[LLVMdev] Fatal error in build, include <utility> not found
Hi Andrew, I suggest you do a verbose build (make VERBOSE=1) in order to see exactly which command is being used to compile that file. Ciao, Duncan. On 03/01/13 14:50, APaschos wrote: > I'm trying to customize llvm by adding a header file of my own and tweaking > things accordingly. > While building, things go well until a certain point where it stops seeing > the includes of my
2019 Apr 30
6
Disk space and RAM requirements in docs
Hi, Have anybody recently built LLVM in Debug mode /within/ space requirements from the Getting Started doc? https://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#hardware > An LLVM-only build will need about 1-3 GB of space. A full build of LLVM and Clang will need around 15-20 GB of disk space. From my experience this numbers looks drastically low. On FreeBSD my recent builds consumed more than