similar to: [LLVMdev] Splitting basic block results in unknown instruction type assertion

Dear mailinglist members, I was wondering if there was a way to re-evaluate the instances of a tree (in the forest) again after I have manually changed a splitpoint (or split variable) of a decision node. Here's an illustration: library("randomForest") forest.rf <- randomForest(formula = Species ~ ., data = iris, do.trace = TRUE, ntree = 3, mtry = 2, norm.votes = FALSE) # I am

Fixes: [ 0%] In file included from /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/include/llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h:30:0, from /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/include/llvm/InstVisitor.h:16, from /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/tools/bugpoint-passes/TestPasses.cpp:19: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Intrinsics.h:41:34: fatal error: llvm/IR/Intrinsics.gen: No

Hi, I'm working on an LLVM Pass plugin and I'm running into a problem when loading it into opt. I want to have a custom option for my pass and added an llvm::cl::opt #include'ing "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h" linking the dependant libs causes the following error when loading it with opt: opt: CommandLine Error: Option 'debug-pass' registered more than once! I

Hi Philip, thanks for the quick answer. That makes sense, but when leaving the set LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS out I get an undefined symbol when loading the plugin: _ZTVN4llvm2cl3optINSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEELb0ENS0_6parserIS7_EEEE which boils down to llvm::cl::opt<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>,

Johannes Obermayr <johannesobermayr at gmx.de> writes: > Fixes: > [ 0%] In file included from /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/include/llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h:30:0, > from /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/include/llvm/InstVisitor.h:16, > from /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/tools/bugpoint-passes/TestPasses.cpp:19: >

Hello everyone, just wondering if anyone can help me with a migrations question here. Using: rails 2.0.2 ruby 1.8.6 (2007-09-24 patchlevel 111) [i386-mswin] mysql 5.0.45 Platform: windows xp The problem: ---------- I created a migration that is designed to add a column named "deleted_at" (timestamp) and then remove a column named "is_deleted" (boolean). The idea is to

Hello all, Still, is it impossible to use the external llvm custom pass on windows? I can build the 'mypass.dll' on windows using LLVM libraries. And, I use these 2 way to use my pass. clang.exe -Xclang -load -Xclang mypass.dll -c test.c opt.exe -load -Xclang mypass.dll -mypass test.bc -o optimized_test.bc But, Clang and opt didn't working well with my pass. This mean, my pass

Hi all, I was wondering if there is a defined ABI for passing vector as parameter for ARM target. For instance is this valid to write .ll statement like: ; ModuleID = 'bugconv.ll' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-n32" target triple = "thumbv7-none-linux-androideabi" define

On Apr 14, 2009, at 1:49 PM, Luke Dalessandro wrote: > > On Apr 14, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Brice Lin wrote: > >> I just read the LLVM Programmer's Manual, which mentions (but >> specifically does not include any details of) the InstVisitor >> template. Could someone please provide an example of how to use this >> template to find (as an example) all CallSites for

I just read the LLVM Programmer's Manual, which mentions (but specifically does not include any details of) the InstVisitor template. Could someone please provide an example of how to use this template to find (as an example) all CallSites for the function strcpy? Thanks, Brice Lin

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2331 Bug ID: 2331 Summary: ssh-copy-id -i id_new.pub fails to copy that id, also: wrong error msg Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component:

Hi Rotem, Thanks for the quick answer, how do I know which type is legal/illegal with respect to calling convention ? Best Regards Seb > -----Original Message----- > From: Rotem, Nadav [mailto:nadav.rotem at intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 11:21 AM > To: Sebastien DELDON-GNB; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: RE: Vector argument passing abi for ARM ? > > The

The various intrinsic assert/crashes should all be fixed on mainline CVS (they are PR733, which I just fixed). The only ones that I'm wary of are: XPASS: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2004-02-20- StaticRedeclare.c.tr FAIL: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2005-12-04- DeclarationLineNumbers.c: In the former case, I would guess that the test isn't

Branches have been created. You are free to checkin to cvs head again. I'll send mail once I have the prerelease tar balls up. Please continue to review and revise the documentation. I can fold this into the release later. Thanks, Tanya On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Tanya Lattner wrote: > > I will be creating the release branch at 1:00pm PDT. Please refrain from > checking in from

I will be creating the release branch at 1:00pm PDT. Please refrain from checking in from 1:00-1:30pm. I will send email once I am done. Thanks, Tanya

Here's what's left on Linux (GCC 4.1.0), after all updates that went into the branch: Running /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/dg.exp ... FAIL: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2004-02-12- LargeAggregateCopy.c.tr: gccas: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/lib/VMCore/Function.cpp:266: unsigned int llvm::Function::getIntrinsicID() const: Assertion `0 &&

Hi. I'm testing out the new 'master users' feature, and I'm not having any luck getting it to work. Anyone out there using it yet? Here's what I have so far: dovecot.conf: ------------ auth_master_user_separator = * auth default { passdb passwd-file { # Master users that can login as anyone else args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot.masterusers master = yes

Thanks for providing me with those examples. My rather inefficient pass, which inherits from ModulePass, currently iterates through the Module, Functions, and BasicBlocks multiple times (once to find strcpy, another to find strcat, and so on for various other functions). If I only care about the direct calls, would I benefit more from switching to multiple use_iterators or the InstVisitor

Hi List, My IR compiles fine and runs. I've tried to add DebugIR pass so as to be able to debug and profile it (since source is an SQL query all that I can debug and profile is IR itself). When I tried to add it to pass manager I got the following assert: Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0x00007ffff3fe4425 in __GI_raise (sig=<optimized out>) at

I just updated again (both llvm and llvm-gcc). The only thing that changed was: P test/Regression/CFrontend/2005-12-04-DeclarationLineNumbers.c The regression test below was done *with* your llvm-gcc changes to llvm- expand.c. I don't know what the failures are all about, but I will try it again. If its the same, I'll let you know. Reid. On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 16:20 -0500, Chris Lattner