similar to: [LLVMdev] Instructions on a target with no general purpose registers

Well, the stack pointer be a single byte, so pushing things on there doesn't work terribly well. Assuming I pass by reference, that's 128 values absolutely total before it wraps around and silently clobbers itself. It means single byte values will be incredibly inefficient... Tricky stuff. I'm lucky on the C64 since it's rare to exit back to the kernel with machine language apps

I suppose that once you've got a 6502 working, adding support for a 4510 shouldn't be too difficult.... (http://c65gs.blogspot.com.au/) On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Bruce Hoult <bruce at hoult.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Edwin Amsler <edwinguy at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Well, the stack pointer be a single byte, so pushing things on there

Hey there! I've started to embark on a path to try and create a backend for a 39 year old CPU with only an accumulator, two index registers, and a 256 byte stack. It does have a bank of 256 bytes before the stack that are pretty quick though. Really, if I can get an assembler out of `llc`, that'll be success enough for me. Clang would be better, but I think that might be crazy talk.

On Saturday 19 December 2009 00:16, Chris Lattner wrote: > > Or I think I can just assume (Yikes!) that if the signal handler is > > invoked it will really be a circular_raw_ostream since the handler > > should (!) only be set up in debug mode. > > > > That scares me a bit, though. > > Why don't you just check #ifndef NDEBUG like the code that sets it up?

Hey, I got a weird one for you guys, I am running vanilla 1.2.4 and have all incoming calls come in as SIP from teliax. Twice over the past week 2 callers who have called in around the same time end up talking to each other instead of going through the ivr or at some point during the IVR. One said, yeah i was talking to another patient and we had a convo. I have double checked the dialplan and

On 2009-12-21 18:06, David Greene wrote: > On Saturday 19 December 2009 00:16, Chris Lattner wrote: > > >>> Or I think I can just assume (Yikes!) that if the signal handler is >>> invoked it will really be a circular_raw_ostream since the handler >>> should (!) only be set up in debug mode. >>> >>> That scares me a bit, though. >>>

Anyone know of a provider that has 847 DID Numbers? I would like to connect with them via IAX2. Zac -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040512/bd98e86b/attachment.htm

For some time I have been using wine plus winetools on Ubuntu Breezy, allowing me to be able to use Internet Explorer on linux. When updating to the newer versions of Wine on either Brreezy or Dapper, I find that internet explorer n longer works. The winetools page shows two files that need to be downloaded wt-config.reg and ie6.reg along with winetools for wine 9.x No where can I find how to

Hi, I have started to write an llvm backend for one of our microcontrollers (PICxx). I started studying the framework of PowerPc backend of llvm and decided to start by following that framework. Now I have most of the classes and Tblgen files written for a very basic hypothetical microcontroller with very few instructions. The project builds and the llc recognizes the new processor, however,

I saw this on the SuSE AMD64 list & decided to pass it along, since it seems like a sneaky problem. Later posts confirm it is *NOT* AMD64-specific, nor SuSE 9.3 specific .... -- William A. Mahaffey III --------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember, ignorance is bliss, but willful ignorance is LIBERALISM !!!! -------------- next part -------------- An

>>> Amit Ashara <ashara.amit at gmail.com> schrieb am 12.05.2016 um 17:47 in Nachricht <CAEyg9sgjbsxQY-=VnhQrKiGeTcFSRr1wxOPUhNyCQF8Piuahow at mail.gmail.com>: > Hello Jean-Marc, > > Assuming that a 48KHz, 20ms 8-bit linear PCM data which is 960 bytes is > compressed to 64 bytes (for assumption). The with the Oggs header (4 byte) Actually what I don't

Hello Everybody! :D :D :D I changed from Windows to Ubuntu a short time ago. Under Win I programmed microcontrollers with Microchip PicKit2 programmer, which has USB connection. After I installed Ms .NET Framework 2.0 with winetricks, the Wine enablet do install PicKit2 program; it runs, but can not wiev / handle programmer, which I plug in to an USB port. Please help me. Have any USB

Interested in building a speex codec (basically audio <-> speex <-> data stream) using TI's small MSP430 microcontroller. Is there any way to estimate feasibility based on CPU requirements? Example - speex is happily encoding on an old Pentium-1 processor (166 MHz) using about half the CPU (as reported under Linux); the TI microcontrollers are much slower yet (8-16-25 MHz) and

On Tue, September 19, 2017 1:42 pm, Nux! wrote: > Unfortunately the same can be said about Ruby, RoR, Python etc etc etc. It is not as much true about languages themselves (though it is true, and I for one call python "sneaky snake" just because of that ;-), as about how the software using these languages is written. E.g. well known mailman. I never had it give me any trouble

Hello Cesar I'm using Speex on a PPC2002 and PPC2003 with no problems. For tune-up remember to define the FIXED_POINT macro in Project->Settings in eVC. With this setting you ought to be able to at least decode in realtime while using debug-mode. Kind regards Bjoern D. Rasmussen >From: "cesarbremer@raseac.com.br" <cesarbremer@raseac.com.br> >To: speex-dev@xiph.org

So I've been designing an experimental 6502 backend for LLVM. Link: <https://github.com/beholdnec/llvm-m6502> The 6502 only has a few registers, one accumulator and two indexes, none of which are large enough to hold an absolute pointer. Because of this, the backend really tests the power of LLVM's register allocator (RA). I've made a change to the RA that might be of interest

Zac, Thanks for the input. This would cover it, however it is not stealth. In some cases, you may want it to be stealth. Again, my state allows me to do this, but some states do not. I've done a little searching and could not find an answer. Basically, to simplify the question: When is it legal to record interstate calls without giving notice, when the recording party is in a one-party

I bumped into the following situation: Browse[1]> coef deg0NA deg4NA deg8NA deg0NP deg4NP deg8NP (Intercept) 462 510 528 492 660 762 Browse[1]> coef[,1] [1] 462 Browse[1]> coef[,1,drop=F] deg0NA (Intercept) 462 where I really wanted neither, but (Intercept) 462 Anyone happen to know a neat way out of the conundrum? I can think of

On 04/06/18 13:51, Ulf Volmer wrote: > On 06.04.2018 18:25, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> CentOS 7 box. As there's no package in any of the repos, we're trying to >> install scikit-learn in the user's space. It refuses. My late try was, >> after d/l a .whl from last year, hoping that would work with the numpy >> package in the regular repos, I did a pip

Hello, We have an excellent opportunity for compiler enthusiasts having significant experience in writing compilers for microcontrollers. The job is based in Bangalore, India and would require someone who is willing to relocate here and is authorized to work here without sponsorship. Development experience on LLVM compiler system would be a plus. Required education is a graduate or