similar to: [LLVMdev] Another phabricator feature request...

> On 2014-Jun-27, at 11:48, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > I know you worked hard to make sure that updating a revision doesn't send email unless there is text typed into one of the boxes Manuel, but I think we should by default put some text into a box (and send the

It's actually surprising to me that the emails from Phabricator and llvm's svn *DO* get through most of the time. Both of these fabricate the "From" address to generate an email purportedly be from the author of the svn revision or phabricator comment's email address. While the message is hopefully from the real person behind that email address, those messages are decidedly

On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 27 June 2014 21:53, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> > wrote: > > Then the only way for people to "accept" something is by typing text > > to that effect. > > If you don't "Accept" the patch, you can't close the issue. So, either

Do you have a bounced email, we can look at for clues? > On Jul 10, 2015, at 12:49 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > Ok, apple addresses still bounce without a reason - the sendgrid folks say this is completely controlled by apple.com <http://apple.com/>'s mail servers - do you have somebody you can ask? > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:10 AM Manuel

> On 2014-Jun-27, at 11:50, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: >> I know you worked hard to make sure that updating a revision doesn't send >> email unless there is text typed into one of the boxes Manuel, but I think >> we should by default put some

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Yaron Keren <yaron.keren at gmail.com> wrote: > Happened to me twice, it would be really nice if Phab would require > confirmation of patches created without CCing one of the two lists, > something like: > > "You have not CCed llvm-commits or cfe-commits, are you creating a private > patch?" > I filed

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com > wrote: > I think the send-email part of phab has yet to come back up. > Yes, restarting it would be very helpful. > > > Cheers, > > Jon > > > On 12/10/14 1:59 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote: > >> Phab is back up - it's still a little slow (the mysql database we use is

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 2:16:00 AM Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jonathan Roelofs < >> jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: >> >>> I think the send-email part of phab has yet to come back up. >>>

Alp noted that the current setup on how phab reviews land on the list are not working for him. I'd be curious whether his setup is special, or whether there are more widespread problems. If this is more widely perceived as a problem, please speak up, and I'll make sure to prioritize the fixes (note that this is unrelated to the "lost email" problem - those are always highest

Phab is back up - it's still a little slow (the mysql database we use is doing some cleanups). On Wed Dec 10 2014 at 5:07:07 PM suyog sarda <sardask01 at gmail.com> wrote: > And i was thinking something wrong with my proxy configuration :P > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > >> Heya, >> >> if you wonder

Another php type problem; can you please try again. Thanks! On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 1:37:32 PM Bruno Cardoso Lopes < bruno.cardoso at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm facing the same problem. > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:16 AM, suyog sarda <sardask01 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am facing problem while submitting patch on phab. All things go smooth > - >

Hi, I am facing problem while submitting patch on phab. All things go smooth - create diff, create revision, specify title and comments. However, when I try to submit the diff by clicking "save" button, it takes a lot of time and eventually times out, failing to submit the patch. Any help on this? On Thursday, December 11, 2014, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: >

Heya, I'll look into it first thing tomorrow - probably a problem with the encoding settings. On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 9:17:40 PM Robinson, Paul < Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote: > What I'm seeing is that Phabricator emails double-space *everything* > (not just the diffs). > > --paulr > > > > *From:* cfe-dev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu

Greetings llvm'ers, I'm working on an update to phabricator that brings our fork significantly closer to the upstream version, thus making maintenance much easier; this will allow us to upgrade more often. Upstream has fixed many issues and introduced new ways to customize the email flow, so a) while rolling out the new version I'll be fiddling with config settings; during that

Hi Manuel, Thanks for the help. Still persists for me too. Instead of waiting indefinitely, now I get this error: Unhandled Exception ("AphrontDeadlockQueryException") #1205: Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:26 AM, suyog sarda <sardask01 at gmail.com> wrote: > The problem still persist :( > > On 12/11/14, Manuel Klimek

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Alex Bradbury <asb at asbradbury.org> wrote: > On 12 May 2014 08:35, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> > wrote: > >> > >> It seems that we cannot execute svn commands against llvm-project any > >> more: > >> $ svn

This might be slightly off topic, but I'd really like a way to be able to run the buildbots off a Phabricator Diff before committing. On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > Unfortunately threading will be broken for changes currently under review > (new patches shouldn't have the problem). > I'm very sorry for this inconvenience

I filed a ticket with sendgrid. Since we're paying them money nowadays, I hope they'll answer quickly On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:05 AM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > aaaaaand you're on the bounce list again. I'm going to delete you again, > but I'd be curious what the problem is... > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:50 PM Adam Nemet <anemet at

You were in sendgrid's bounce list (there must have been at least one bounce from your email to the apple servers). Please let me know if other people had similar problems. On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:11 PM Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Manuel, > > Thanks for the update it has some nice new features. There is one issue I > am seeing since the update though. I

> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:19 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:16 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com <mailto:klimek at google.com>> wrote: >> >> You were in sendgrid's bounce list (there must have been at least one bounce from your email to the apple servers). Please let me know if other people had