similar to: [LLVMdev] Problems with make

Dear, Can anybody comment on inserting inline assembly in LLVM IR? -- Pratik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140620/03400e95/attachment.html>

Dear, I have the following problem. I am given 2 instructions say I1 and I2 whose selection should depend on the operands. Say the operands have a boolean attribute 'attr'. I would like to select I1 and I2 by some logic that involves the 'attr' attribute of all the operands involved. eg: If all operands have attr set to True, I want I1 to be selected to operate else I2. How can I

Dear, I am looking at the Instructions defined in the XXXXInstrInfo.td where I can see a def record defined like below def ADD8rr : I8rr<0x0, (outs GR8:$dst), (ins GR8:$src, GR8:$src2), "add.b\t{$src2, $dst}", [(set GR8:$dst, (*add *GR8:$src, GR8:$src2)), (implicit SRW)]>; Now here I would like the to

Dear, I am looking to build a compiler-assembler with a custom architecture. I have a new Instruction set defined with me and I would like atleast my C programs to get converted to assembly language corresponding to the custom architecture. I have been going through llvm and its resources on the web, Can any one of you offer guidance about the above problem. All I want is to develop a tool

Dear, I am new to llvm and hence have very little idea about a problem that is my university project. I am supposed to assume a X86 CPU supporting an instruction ADDenc that adds two encrypted operands. The original ADD also exists and should operate on unencrypted operands. My task is to transform C programs into the new X86 assembly that supports ADDenc. I have very little idea about this. I

I've looked at it a bit more and an updated ninja is part of it. You also need build.ninja to contain 'pool = console' on the lit rules. I added it manually to try it out but presumably a cmake update is needed to add this automatically. ________________________________ From: Renato Golin [renato.golin at linaro.org] Sent: 23 December 2014 00:55 To: David Blaikie Cc: LLVM Dev; Daniel

Hi Wynand, My big concern is related to what Mehdi mentioned as #4. Bazel doesn't really handle the configuration-management that CMake does, so adding Bazel support would really mean supporting an extra build system with no path for it to replace CMake. We're kinda already in that situation with gn, but gn is a developer productivity tool and we don't consider changes that break gn

Can you guys post a demo of your application ? Would be great. Thanks, Pratik -- rm -rf / 2>/dev/null - http://null.in

I''m sorry - just couldn''t come up with a subject that describes the problem :( Anyway, this is my problem. I have a long list of fields that need to be displayed when a ''show'' is requested on the controller. I''m now doing the list.rhtml and looking for a DRY way to do the following. For each data item, I have 2 fields - one is the item name, the

I''m having a class called Person, with subclasses as goalkeeper, forward, defender. Now a person can be a forward as well as a defender or a goalkeeper. I want to use single table inheritance like : class Goalkeepr < Person end And not have multiple boolean columns like in my people table like is is_goalkpeer, is_forward, is_defender. How do I go about it ? Thanks, Pratik -- rm

Is there a way by which I can do form validation for form generated by In Place Editting of scritaculous? The reason is, I want to avoid server roundtrip for checks which I can perform at browser. Regards, Jatinder -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060828/ca882668/attachment-0001.html

I''m trying to setup my rails application with Light+fcgi. This is the error I''m getting when I try to start Lighttpd : ============ [getcapture@alpha getcapture]$ ~/etc/rc.d/lighttpd.sh start Starting Lighttpd 2006-04-15 11:27:24: (mod_fastcgi.c.1022) execve failed for: /home/getcapture/application/public/dispatch.fcgi No such file or directory [getcapture@alpha getcapture]$

Hi folks, I have following in my view : =================== <div class="foo"> <%= select ''theme'', "id", Theme.find_all.collect {|t| [ t.name, t.id ] }, { :prompt => ''Select a theme'' } %> </div> <%= observe_field( :theme_id, :update => :my_style, :url => { :action => :themelookup, :id => @space,},

Last 2 articles have 500+ comments. Also, whenever I comment, it never appears immediately. It terribly needs an upgrade. -Pratik -- rm -rf / 2>/dev/null - http://null.in

I want to have a field in model, which I''m not storing in a database. And I want to do something like the following in the model code : validates_format_of :field_NOT_in_db, :with => session[:field] How can I do it ? Thanks, Pratik -- rm -rf / 2>/dev/null - http://null.in

Hello everyone, My name is Pratik Bhatu, I am a bachelor student currently studying at IIT Hyderabad, India.  I just finished my Compilers course have been exploring LLVM since the past month (kaleidoscope, writing LLVM passes) and am interested in the llvm-polly project. I am also a potential GSoC applicant and wanted to start working on the project from now. Is there a way I can

So that we can write controller code inside helpers ? are we supposed to do that ? -Pratik -- rm -rf / 2>/dev/null - http://null.in "Things do not happen. Things are made to happen." - JFK

While doing @foo = Bar.new(params[:foo]) in a controller, the application is open to injection attacks. For example, My model has following attributes : name password admin - boolean Now, if on my form I''m just acception name & password, and doing @foo = Bar.new(params[:foo]) in my controller, someone can just enter following in form : <%= text_field ''foo'',

Hi all, trust all is well! I was wondering if LLVM would have a Bazel integrated build in the future? I can imagine the benefits this could bring, especially with regards to remote builds and caching. I'm thinking of dumping the LLVM source-tree into my code-base and experiment with building LLVM via Bazel. Will pull requests be accepted for this? I won't mind contributing my changes

Hello Rails people, I submitted a patch recently to get rid of an annoying exception raised when an AR object is created - http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10556 , had some people review it, got some pluses... What am I supposed to do now? Can anybody advise or just review the patch and take care of the issue? Thanks! -- Best regards, Yuri Leikind