Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] [rfc] "alias weak" X "weak alias""
2014 Jun 07
2
[LLVMdev] [rfc] "alias weak" X "weak alias"
>> The days of the old .ll parser are long gone, but is it too late to
>> change? In case it is not, the attached patches implement just that
>> :-)
> I'm afraid you need to provide syntax autoupgrade until 4.0
Why, we moved to doing autoupgrade via bitcode quiet some time ago.
There were quiet a few format changes to the .ll in the process.
Cheers,
Rafael
2000 Dec 22
1
Found "answer" to my question on MTB's INDICATOR
Dear R-Friends,
Sorry to bother everyone with my earlier question:
"Do we have similar R function to work like Minitab's INDICATOR?"
I found the way to make things work: e.g.,
> x <- c(2,2,5,3,6,5,NA)
> model.matrix(~ factor(x) - 1)
factor(x)2 factor(x)3 factor(x)5 factor(x)6
1 1 0 0 0
2 1 0 0 0
2008 Feb 27
1
how to specify ggplot2 facet plot order
Hi, new to R and ggplot2. I've been trying to get a facet plot in which the
order of the facets is as I require, rather than ordered numerically,
alphabetically, by Roman numerals, mean (answers to these were posted here
after much searching). Here's some test code to demonstrate what I get.
series = c('C2','C4','C8','C10','C15','C20')
ids =
2007 Mar 10
3
long character string problem
Hi All
I am having 2 very long character strings (550chars) and I want to put them as
expressions together with c(). The problem is that I also get these
double-quotes, as seen below in 'fct'. How can I remove these double-quotes? I
tried as.name() but it did not work (because of size?). These are creating
trouble with subsequent programs, which I tested with strings that for some
2008 Feb 27
1
ggplot2 boxplot confusion
Ultimately my aim is to get a plot of density faceted by 2 factors with a
horizontal boxplot overlaid on each density plot in the grid to indicate
summary stats. So I've been experimenting with creating boxplots and density
plots. Here's some representative data.
series = c('C2','C4','C8','C10','C15','C20')
ids =
2005 Jan 20
1
Straight-line fitting with errors in both coordinates
Hi All,
I want to fit a straight line into a group of two-dimensional data points with
errors in both x and y coordinates. I found there is an algorithm provided in
"NUMERICAL RECIPES IN C" http://www.library.cornell.edu/nr/bookcpdf/c15-3.pdf
I'm wondering if there is a similar function for this implemented in R. And
how can I change the objective function, from example, from sum
2009 Jul 15
1
Help with averaging
Hi
I am using the following script to average a set of data 0f 62 columns into 31 colums. The data consists of values of ln(0.01) or -4.60517 instead of NA's. These need to be averaged for each row (i.e 2 values being averaged). What I would I need to change for me to meet the conditions:
1. If each run of the sample has a value, the average is
given
2. If only one run of the sample has a
2016 Apr 08
2
[PATCH mesa v2 1/2] nouveau: codegen: Use FILE_MEMORY_BUFFER for buffers
Hi,
On 23-03-16 23:10, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
> Are you sure this won't break compute shaders on fermi?
> Could you please double-check that?
I just checked:
lspci:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF119 [GeForce GT 610] (rev a1)
Before this patch-set:
[hans at plank piglit]$ ./piglit run -o shader -t '.*arb_shader_storage_buffer_object.*' results/shader
2010 May 27
1
stripplot, lattice
hello,
i can't figure out how to set position of panels of my stripplot -
i`d like the panels of one level of the factor stage (nr. of panels within
each stage, A: 12, B: 12, C: 12, D: 4, each panel representing a site) to be
in one column, with A to D from left to right and with descending site.nr at
each row.
like:
A1 B1 C1 D1
A2 B2 .. ..
A3 .. ..
..
how is this achieved?
any help
2013 Jan 05
2
BUG btrfs fi show displays stale btrfs volume
I''ve filed this bug under util-linux, because I think wipefs isn''t deleting all btrfs metadata it could. But ultimately it appears to be a btrfs bug because nothing else sees the stale volume.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889888#c15
btrfs-progs-0.20.rc1.20121017git92d9eec-1.fc18.x86_64
e2fs-progs-1.42.5-1.fc18.x86_64
kernel 3.7.1-2
Brand new 80GB virtual disk,
2016 Apr 12
2
[PATCH mesa v2 1/2] nouveau: codegen: Use FILE_MEMORY_BUFFER for buffers
Hi,
On 08-04-16 18:14, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
>
>
> On 04/08/2016 12:17 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 23-03-16 23:10, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
>>> Are you sure this won't break compute shaders on fermi?
>>> Could you please double-check that?
>>
>> I just checked:
>>
>> lspci:
>> 01:00.0 VGA compatible
2016 Feb 05
6
Reducing DWARF emitter memory consumption
Hi all,
We have profiled [1] the memory usage in LLVM when LTO'ing Chromium, and
we've found that one of the top consumers of memory is the DWARF emitter in
lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/Dwarf*. I've been reading the DWARF emitter code and
I have a few ideas in mind for how to reduce its memory consumption. One
idea I've had is to restructure the emitter so that (for the most part) it
2011 Apr 09
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg/llvm-gfortran/gfortran benchmarks
With the case-insensitive file system patch from http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9656#c15
applied to dragonegg 2.9, the following Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks are seen on x86_64-apple-darwin10
under gcc 4.5.3svn using the dragonegg plugin...
================================================================================
Date & Time : 8 Apr 2011 19:52:56
Test Name :
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
2017 Sep 21
3
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
I agree with Paul that we need to formalise the compatibility policy before we start removing support for old intrinsics. Do we want a deprecation warning of some kind for the use of any intrinsic used in auto-upgrade, would that actually be useful or just a nuisance?
In the meantime I’m happy to help fix any missing test coverage.
> On 20 Sep 2017, at 22:16, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
2017 Sep 20
2
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
Many of the older autoupgrades have no test cases because I think when we
upgraded them we just replace all the code in the tests with native IR. So
for some of the code we don't even know if it works.
I don't really want to watch the amount of code here continue to grow
indefinitely. It's pretty poorly structured and has been up against the
MSVC cascaded if/else limit a couple times.
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
2017 Sep 20
2
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
We have quite a lot of code in AutoUpgrade.cpp to upgrade X86 intrinsics
that have been replaced with native IR over the years. Has enough time
and/or versions passed that we can begin phasing out some of this code?
As I'm writing these we don't seem to have tests for a lot of the older
upgrades. We've done better at this in the last few years.
3.1 added upgrade for:
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
2017 Sep 22
0
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
Hi,
I believe we have a formal policy: we support every bitcode produced since
LLVM 3.0:
https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#ir-backwards-compatibility
(until we decide to uprev the version we support).
Unfortunately, the testing was only added around 3.6 or 3.7? And support is
only as good as the testing we have...
--
Mehdi
2017-09-21 0:23 GMT-07:00 Simon Pilgrim via llvm-dev <
2009 Jun 09
3
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Fix SSE2 packing intrinsics return type
Hi all,
Please consider committing the attached patch. I believe the SSE2 packsswb,
packssdw and packuswb intrinsics have an incorrect return type.
Thanks,
Nicolas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090609/85ed0b5e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A
2013 Nov 18
2
[LLVMdev] bit code file incompatibility due to debug info changes
>>
>> At a minimum, it seems like we need a version number in the debug info
>> metadata so we can detect this situation and avoid crashing.
>
>
> Or to put it in the terms of the IR: we need to autoupgrade the debug info
> metadata just like we do intrinsics. With debug info this might (at the
> worst) involve dropping old metadata.
>
The verifier is probably
2013 Nov 22
2
[LLVMdev] bit code file incompatibility due to debug info changes
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:01 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at